• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用小鼠血清对RNA提取方法进行检测与比较。

Examination and comparison of the RNA extraction methods using mouse serum.

作者信息

Yamamoto Keisuke, Chiba Mitsuru

机构信息

Department of Bioscience and Laboratory Medicine, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8564, Japan.

Research Center for Biomedical Sciences, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8564, Japan.

出版信息

Biomed Rep. 2024 Jan 30;20(3):51. doi: 10.3892/br.2024.1739. eCollection 2024 Mar.

DOI:10.3892/br.2024.1739
PMID:38357232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10865168/
Abstract

Serum microRNAs (miRNAs) are considered useful as non-invasive biomarkers for different diseases. However, the optimal method for extracting RNAs from serum is currently unknown. In the present study, several RNA extraction kits were used to examine the optimal kit. RNAs were extracted from the serum of 8-week-old C57BL/6NJcl male mice following the protocol of each RNA extraction kit. The yield of the extracted RNA samples was calculated, and an Agilent Bioanalyzer was used to assess the electrophoretic patterns. An Agilent mouse miRNA microarray was utilized to confirm the expression patterns of the extracted RNA samples. The results revealed significant differences in RNA yields from the miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Advanced kit and mirVana™ PARIS™ RNA and Native Protein Purification Kit compared with almost all other samples. Further, two peaks were determined in the miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Advanced kit using a small RNAs kit of Agilent Bioanalyzer, including one at 20-40 nucleotides (nt) and another at ~40-100 nt, whereas the other reagents had a single peak. This revealed that the extracted RNAs may differ in composition based on the RNA extraction method. Some types of miRNAs were only detected with certain RNA extraction reagents. This suggested that different RNA extraction reagents may cause differences in the types of miRNAs detected. On the other hand, the miRNAs commonly expressed by the three RNA extraction reagents are highly correlated in expression levels.

摘要

血清微小RNA(miRNA)被认为是不同疾病的有用非侵入性生物标志物。然而,目前尚不清楚从血清中提取RNA的最佳方法。在本研究中,使用了几种RNA提取试剂盒来检测最佳试剂盒。按照每个RNA提取试剂盒的方案,从8周龄C57BL/6NJcl雄性小鼠的血清中提取RNA。计算提取的RNA样品的产量,并使用安捷伦生物分析仪评估电泳图谱。利用安捷伦小鼠miRNA微阵列确认提取的RNA样品的表达模式。结果显示,与几乎所有其他样品相比,miRNeasy血清/血浆高级试剂盒和mirVana™ PARIS™ RNA和天然蛋白纯化试剂盒的RNA产量存在显著差异。此外,使用安捷伦生物分析仪的小RNA试剂盒在miRNeasy血清/血浆高级试剂盒中确定了两个峰,一个在20 - 40个核苷酸(nt)处,另一个在约40 - 100 nt处,而其他试剂有一个单峰。这表明根据RNA提取方法,提取的RNA在组成上可能有所不同。某些类型的miRNA仅在特定的RNA提取试剂中被检测到。这表明不同的RNA提取试剂可能导致检测到的miRNA类型存在差异。另一方面,三种RNA提取试剂共同表达的miRNA在表达水平上高度相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/266d/10865168/a92a9e8b028d/br-20-03-01739-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/266d/10865168/925803a36772/br-20-03-01739-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/266d/10865168/4f0d97e8c165/br-20-03-01739-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/266d/10865168/a92a9e8b028d/br-20-03-01739-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/266d/10865168/925803a36772/br-20-03-01739-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/266d/10865168/4f0d97e8c165/br-20-03-01739-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/266d/10865168/a92a9e8b028d/br-20-03-01739-g02.jpg

相似文献

1
Examination and comparison of the RNA extraction methods using mouse serum.使用小鼠血清对RNA提取方法进行检测与比较。
Biomed Rep. 2024 Jan 30;20(3):51. doi: 10.3892/br.2024.1739. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Assessment of six commercial plasma small RNA isolation kits using qRT-PCR and electrophoretic separation: higher recovery of microRNA following ultracentrifugation.使用qRT-PCR和电泳分离评估六种商业血浆小RNA分离试剂盒:超速离心后微小RNA的回收率更高。
Biol Methods Protoc. 2016 Dec 27;1(1):bpw003. doi: 10.1093/biomethods/bpw003. eCollection 2016 Mar.
3
Improved protocol for plasma microRNA extraction and comparison of commercial kits.改良的血浆 microRNA 提取方案及商业试剂盒的比较。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021 Oct 15;31(3):030705. doi: 10.11613/BM.2021.030705.
4
Comparison of Methods for MicroRNA Isolation from Extracellular Vesicles Obtained from Ascitic Fluids.从腹水来源的细胞外囊泡中分离 microRNA 的方法比较。
Biochemistry (Mosc). 2022 Nov;87(11):1354-1366. doi: 10.1134/S0006297922110141.
5
Assessing an improved protocol for plasma microRNA extraction.评估一种改进的血浆微小RNA提取方案。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 23;8(12):e82753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082753. eCollection 2013.
6
Comparison and optimisation of microRNA extraction from the plasma of healthy pregnant women.比较和优化健康孕妇血浆中 microRNA 的提取。
Mol Med Rep. 2021 Apr;23(4):1. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2021.11897. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
7
Total RNA extraction from tissues for microRNA and target gene expression analysis: not all kits are created equal.从组织中提取总 RNA 进行 microRNA 和靶基因表达分析:并非所有试剂盒都一样。
BMC Biotechnol. 2018 Mar 16;18(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12896-018-0421-6.
8
Comparison of methods for miRNA isolation and quantification from ovine plasma.绵羊血浆中 miRNA 分离和定量方法的比较。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 21;10(1):825. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57659-7.
9
MicroRNA preparations from individual monogenean Gyrodactylus salaris-a comparison of six commercially available totalRNA extraction kits.来自单殖吸虫锚首虫个体的微小RNA制剂——六种市售总RNA提取试剂盒的比较
BMC Res Notes. 2011 Jun 29;4:217. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-217.
10
Optimized microRNA purification from TRIzol-treated plasma.从经TRIzol处理的血浆中优化微小RNA的纯化。
BMC Genomics. 2015 Feb 18;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1299-5.

引用本文的文献

1
MicroRNA‑21‑5p expression in extracellular vesicles is increased in the blood of aging mice and in vascular endothelial cells induced by ionizing radiation.衰老小鼠血液及电离辐射诱导的血管内皮细胞中,细胞外囊泡中的微小RNA-21-5p表达增加。
Exp Ther Med. 2024 Nov 25;29(2):22. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12772. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Serum‑derived exosomal hsa‑let‑7b‑5p as a biomarker for predicting the severity of coronary stenosis in patients with coronary heart disease and hyperglycemia.血清衍生的外泌体 hsa-let-7b-5p 作为预测冠心病合并高血糖患者冠状动脉狭窄严重程度的生物标志物。
Mol Med Rep. 2023 Nov;28(5). doi: 10.3892/mmr.2023.13090. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
2
Identification of exosomal microRNA panel as diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for small cell lung cancer.鉴定外泌体微小RNA谱作为小细胞肺癌的诊断和预后生物标志物
Biomark Res. 2023 Sep 13;11(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40364-023-00517-1.
3
A review of the regulatory mechanisms of extracellular vesicles-mediated intercellular communication.
细胞外囊泡介导的细胞间通讯的调控机制综述。
Cell Commun Signal. 2023 Apr 13;21(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12964-023-01103-6.
4
Extracellular vesicle microRNA and protein cargo profiling in three clinical-grade stem cell products reveals key functional pathways.三种临床级干细胞产品中细胞外囊泡微小RNA和蛋白质载量分析揭示关键功能途径
Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2023 Mar 9;32:80-93. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2023.03.001. eCollection 2023 Jun 13.
5
The Role of microRNAs in Inflammation.microRNAs 在炎症中的作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Dec 7;23(24):15479. doi: 10.3390/ijms232415479.
6
MicroRNAs in extracellular vesicles: Sorting mechanisms, diagnostic value, isolation, and detection technology.细胞外囊泡中的微小RNA:分选机制、诊断价值、分离及检测技术
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Oct 17;10:948959. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.948959. eCollection 2022.
7
Bladder cancer diagnosis with a four-miRNA panel in serum.利用血清中的四种微小RNA组合进行膀胱癌诊断。
Future Oncol. 2022 Sep;18(29):3311-3322. doi: 10.2217/fon-2022-0448. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
8
Comparison of Simple RNA Extraction Methods for Molecular Diagnosis of Hepatitis C Virus in Plasma.血浆中丙型肝炎病毒分子诊断的简单RNA提取方法比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 30;12(7):1599. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12071599.
9
snoRNAs: functions and mechanisms in biological processes, and roles in tumor pathophysiology.小核仁RNA:生物过程中的功能与机制,以及在肿瘤病理生理学中的作用
Cell Death Discov. 2022 May 12;8(1):259. doi: 10.1038/s41420-022-01056-8.
10
Emerging blood exosome-based biomarkers for preclinical and clinical Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review.新兴的基于血液外泌体的生物标志物用于临床前和临床阿尔茨海默病:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Neural Regen Res. 2022 Nov;17(11):2381-2390. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.335832.