Sharma Neha, Kochar Mandira, Allardyce Benjamin James, Rajkhowa Rangam, Agrawal Ruchi
The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) Deakin Nanobiotechnology Centre, Sustainable Agriculture Programme, TERI Gram, Gwal Pahari, Gurugram, India.
Deakin University, Institute for Frontier Materials, Geelong, Australia.
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Jan 31;15:1336884. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1336884. eCollection 2024.
Fertilizer management is crucial to maintaining a balance between environmental health, plant health, and total crop yield. Farmers are overutilizing fertilizers with a mind set to enhance the productive capacity of the field, which adversely impacts soil fertility and causes serious environmental hazards. To mitigate the issues of over-utilization of fertilizers, controlled-release fertilizers were developed using nitrogen fertilizer (ammonium chloride) loaded on cellulose nanofibres (named CNF*N).
In this study, the effects of CNFN were compared with commercial nitrogen fertilizer (ammonium chloride) on (Mung) under greenhouse conditions. The pot experiment was conducted using six treatments: first treatment was control, where the plant was cultivated (T1); second treatment was T2, where the plant was cultivated with CNF to determine the impact of CNF on the plant; third was T3 where commercial ammonium chloride (24 mg/ 2 kg soil) was added to the plant; fourth was T4, where the plant was loaded with CNF, viz. CNFN contains 4.8 mg of nitrogen; fifth was T5 CNFN pellet contains 12 mg of nitrogen, and the last sixth treatment (T6) where CNFN pellet containing 24 mg of nitrogen.
It indicated that the growth parameters were best achieved in T6 treatment. Plant height was at its maximum in the T6 treatment (44.4 ±0.1cm) after the second harvest, whereas the minimum plant height was observed in T1, which was 39.1 ±0.1 cm. Root-to-shoot weight ratio was also maximum in T6 (0.183± 0.02) and minimum in T1 (0.07± 0.01) after second harvesting. The significant difference among the treatments was determined with Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD). The nitrogen content (available and total) was significantly higher in the T4, T5, and T6 treatments (0.22, 0.25, and 0.28%) as compared to the control treatments (T1 (0.12%), T2 (0.13%), and T3 (0.14%) during the second harvesting stage (90 days), as nitrogen plays a crucial role in the development of vegetative growth in . The rate of controlled-release nitrogen-fertilizer was found to be optimal in terms of plant growth and soil nutrients; hence, it could potentially play a crucial role in improving soil health and the yield of the crop.
肥料管理对于维持环境健康、植物健康和作物总产量之间的平衡至关重要。农民为了提高田地的生产能力而过度使用肥料,这对土壤肥力产生了不利影响,并造成了严重的环境危害。为了缓解肥料过度使用的问题,人们开发了一种控释肥料,即把氮肥(氯化铵)负载在纤维素纳米纤维上(命名为CNF*N)。
在本研究中,在温室条件下,将CNFN与商用氮肥(氯化铵)对绿豆的影响进行了比较。盆栽试验采用六种处理方式:第一种处理为对照,即种植植物(T1);第二种处理为T2,即种植添加了CNF的植物,以确定CNF对植物的影响;第三种处理为T3,即向植物添加商用氯化铵(24毫克/2千克土壤);第四种处理为T4,即向植物负载CNF,即CNFN含4.8毫克氮;第五种处理为T5,即CNFN颗粒含12毫克氮;最后第六种处理(T6)为CNFN颗粒含24毫克氮。
结果表明,T6处理的生长参数最佳。第二次收获后,T6处理的株高最高(44.4±0.1厘米),而T1处理的株高最低,为39.1±0.1厘米。第二次收获后,根冠比在T6处理中也最高(0.183±0.02),在T1处理中最低(0.07±0.01)。各处理之间的显著差异通过Tukey真实显著差异(HSD)来确定。在第二次收获阶段(90天),与对照处理(T1(0.12%)、T2(0.13%)和T3(0.14%))相比,T4、T5和T6处理中的氮含量(有效氮和总氮)显著更高(分别为0.22%、0.25%和0.28%),因为氮在绿豆营养生长发育中起着关键作用。就植物生长和土壤养分而言,控释氮肥的施用量被发现是最佳的;因此,它可能在改善土壤健康和作物产量方面发挥关键作用。