• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与数据博弈:iToBoS 项目中健康数据的风险、益处、矛盾与技术

Dicing with data: the risks, benefits, tensions and tech of health data in the iToBoS project.

作者信息

Aspell Niamh, Goldsteen Abigail, Renwick Robin

机构信息

Innovation & Research, Trilateral Research Ltd., Waterford, Ireland.

Data Security and Privacy, IBM Research, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2024 Jan 31;6:1272709. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1272709. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1272709
PMID:38357640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10864635/
Abstract

This paper will discuss the European funded iToBoS project, tasked by the European Commission to develop an AI diagnostic platform for the early detection of skin melanoma. The paper will outline the project, provide an overview of the data being processed, describe the impact assessment processes, and explain the AI privacy risk mitigation methods being deployed. Following this, the paper will offer a brief discussion of some of the more complex aspects: (1) the relatively low population clinical trial study cohort, which poses risks associated with data distinguishability and the masking ability of the applied anonymisation tools, (2) the project's ability to obtain informed consent from the study cohort given the complexity of the technologies, (3) the project's commitment to an open research data strategy and the additional privacy risk mitigations required to protect the multi-modal study data, and (4) the ability of the project to adequately explain the outputs of the algorithmic components to a broad range of stakeholders. The paper will discuss how the complexities have caused tension which are reflective of wider tensions in the health domain. A project level solution includes collaboration with a melanoma patient network, as an avenue for fair and representative qualification of risks and benefits with the patient stakeholder group. However, it is unclear how scalable this process is given the relentless pursuit of innovation within the health domain, accentuated by the continued proliferation of artificial intelligence, open data strategies, and the integration of multi-modal data sets inclusive of genomics.

摘要

本文将讨论由欧盟资助的iToBoS项目,该项目由欧盟委员会委托开发一个用于早期检测皮肤黑色素瘤的人工智能诊断平台。本文将概述该项目,提供所处理数据的概述,描述影响评估过程,并解释所采用的人工智能隐私风险缓解方法。在此之后,本文将简要讨论一些较为复杂的方面:(1)相对较小的人群临床试验研究队列,这带来了与数据可区分性以及所应用匿名化工具的屏蔽能力相关的风险;(2)鉴于技术的复杂性,该项目从研究队列中获得知情同意的能力;(3)该项目对开放研究数据策略的承诺以及保护多模态研究数据所需的额外隐私风险缓解措施;(4)该项目向广泛的利益相关者充分解释算法组件输出的能力。本文将讨论这些复杂性如何引发了紧张关系,而这些紧张关系反映了健康领域更广泛的紧张状况。项目层面的解决方案包括与黑色素瘤患者网络合作,以此作为与患者利益相关者群体公平且具有代表性地评估风险和收益的途径。然而,鉴于健康领域对创新的不懈追求,由于人工智能的持续普及、开放数据策略以及包含基因组学的多模态数据集的整合而更加突出,目前尚不清楚这个过程的可扩展性如何。

相似文献

1
Dicing with data: the risks, benefits, tensions and tech of health data in the iToBoS project.与数据博弈:iToBoS 项目中健康数据的风险、益处、矛盾与技术
Front Digit Health. 2024 Jan 31;6:1272709. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1272709. eCollection 2024.
2
European network for Health Technology Assessment Joint Action (EUnetHTA JA): a process evaluation performed by questionnaires and documentary analysis.欧洲卫生技术评估网络联合行动(EUnetHTA JA):通过问卷调查和文献分析进行的过程评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Jun;18(37):1-296. doi: 10.3310/hta18370.
3
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.项目数据领域计划:通过数据共享加速癌症研究
Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
4
Artificial intelligence in neuroradiology: a scoping review of some ethical challenges.神经放射学中的人工智能:对一些伦理挑战的范围界定性综述
Front Radiol. 2023 May 15;3:1149461. doi: 10.3389/fradi.2023.1149461. eCollection 2023.
5
Lung cancer multi-omics digital human avatars for integrating precision medicine into clinical practice: the LANTERN study.用于将精准医学整合到临床实践中的肺癌多组学数字人类替身:LANTERN 研究。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Jun 13;23(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10997-x.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Exploring Stakeholder Requirements to Enable the Research and Development of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in a Hospital-Based Generic Infrastructure: Protocol for a Multistep Mixed Methods Study.探索利益相关者需求以推动基于医院的通用基础设施中人工智能算法的研发:一项多步骤混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Dec 16;11(12):e42208. doi: 10.2196/42208.
8
Implementation of a pan-European ecosystem and an interoperable platform for Smart and Healthy Ageing in Europe: An Innovation Action research protocol.在欧洲实施泛欧生态系统及用于智能健康老龄化的互操作性平台:一项创新行动研究方案。
Open Res Eur. 2022 Jul 4;2:85. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14827.1. eCollection 2022.
9
Structural Transformation to Attain Responsible BIOSciences (STARBIOS2): Protocol for a Horizon 2020 Funded European Multicenter Project to Promote Responsible Research and Innovation.实现负责任生物科学的结构转型(STARBIOS2):一项由“地平线2020”资助的欧洲多中心项目促进负责任研究与创新的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 7;8(3):e11745. doi: 10.2196/11745.
10
Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review and thematic analysis.多利益相关方对人工智能在医疗保健中的应用的偏好:系统评价和主题分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;338:116357. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116357. Epub 2023 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolutionary game analysis of healthcare data governance in China's experimental data trading pilots.中国实验性数据交易试点中医疗数据治理的演化博弈分析
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Sep 1;8(1):562. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01950-2.

本文引用的文献

1
A Process Related View on the Usage of Electronic Health Records from the Patients' Perspective: A Systematic Review.从患者角度看电子健康记录的使用:一个过程相关的观点:系统评价。
J Med Syst. 2022 Dec 29;47(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s10916-022-01886-0.
2
You Can't Have AI Both Ways: Balancing Health Data Privacy and Access Fairly.人工智能不能两全其美:公平平衡健康数据隐私与获取
Front Genet. 2022 Jun 13;13:929453. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.929453. eCollection 2022.
3
Applying Artificial Intelligence Privacy Technology in the Healthcare Domain.在医疗保健领域应用人工智能隐私技术。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 25;294:121-122. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220410.
4
The evolution of the human healthcare system and implications for understanding our responses to COVID-19.人类医疗保健系统的演变及其对理解我们对新冠疫情反应的启示。
Evol Med Public Health. 2022 Feb 12;10(1):87-107. doi: 10.1093/emph/eoac004. eCollection 2022.
5
The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care.当前医疗保健中可解释人工智能方法的虚假希望。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Nov;3(11):e745-e750. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00208-9.
6
Patient apprehensions about the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare.患者对医疗保健中使用人工智能的担忧。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Sep 21;4(1):140. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00509-1.
7
AI, big data, and the future of consent.人工智能、大数据与同意的未来。
AI Soc. 2022;37(4):1715-1728. doi: 10.1007/s00146-021-01262-5. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
8
Patient Perceptions on Data Sharing and Applying Artificial Intelligence to Health Care Data: Cross-sectional Survey.患者对数据共享和将人工智能应用于医疗保健数据的看法:横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 26;23(8):e26162. doi: 10.2196/26162.
9
Genomics: data sharing needs an international code of conduct.基因组学:数据共享需要一部国际行为准则。
Nature. 2020 Feb;578(7793):31-33. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00082-9.
10
Genome-wide association studies and polygenic risk scores for skin cancer: clinically useful yet?皮肤癌的全基因组关联研究和多基因风险评分:目前在临床上有用吗?
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Dec;181(6):1146-1155. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17917. Epub 2019 Jul 7.