• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国实验性数据交易试点中医疗数据治理的演化博弈分析

Evolutionary game analysis of healthcare data governance in China's experimental data trading pilots.

作者信息

Yao Han, Liu Yuanli

机构信息

School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Sep 1;8(1):562. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01950-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-025-01950-2
PMID:40890451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12402068/
Abstract

This study constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model involving healthcare data management authorities (DMAs), healthcare data operating departments (DODs), and data-related entities (DEs) within a triple principal-agent framework. We analyze dynamic interactions among these stakeholders in healthcare data governance, focusing on privacy security, moral hazard, and interest alignment. Results indicate that strategic instability arises under conditions of ambiguous data property rights and asymmetric risk responsibilities. However, the system converges to compliance-oriented equilibria when critical thresholds are surpassed. Notably, DMAs' strong incentive strategies are pivotal in resolving regulatory paradoxes, while DODs' risk behaviors exhibit nonlinear sensitivity to penalty intensity and revenue levels. We further demonstrate that a dual "penalty-compensation" mechanism mitigates economic losses from data breaches, and synergistic government reputation mechanisms with financial incentives reduce regulatory costs. Policy implications include a tiered dynamic regulatory system, a revenue-risk linked distribution mechanism, and a collaborative governance ecosystem driven by technology and credibility constraints.

摘要

本研究在三重委托代理框架内构建了一个涉及医疗数据管理机构(DMA)、医疗数据运营部门(DOD)和数据相关实体(DE)的三方演化博弈模型。我们分析了这些利益相关者在医疗数据治理中的动态互动,重点关注隐私安全、道德风险和利益协调。结果表明,在数据产权模糊和风险责任不对称的情况下会出现战略不稳定。然而,当超过临界阈值时,系统会收敛到以合规为导向的均衡状态。值得注意的是,DMA的强激励策略在解决监管悖论方面至关重要,而DOD的风险行为对惩罚强度和收入水平表现出非线性敏感性。我们进一步证明,双重“惩罚 - 补偿”机制减轻了数据泄露造成的经济损失,并且具有财政激励的协同政府声誉机制降低了监管成本。政策启示包括分层动态监管系统、收入 - 风险挂钩分配机制以及由技术和信誉约束驱动的协同治理生态系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/ae41ad3681f3/41746_2025_1950_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/da0d61871f6b/41746_2025_1950_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/d280771f8ae9/41746_2025_1950_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/bfdeb1d4f8cc/41746_2025_1950_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/976a715f8085/41746_2025_1950_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/9e9af409a4a4/41746_2025_1950_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/3d119a8307a9/41746_2025_1950_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/c43277f7f628/41746_2025_1950_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/89c655d01f03/41746_2025_1950_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/866abe48eea3/41746_2025_1950_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/ae41ad3681f3/41746_2025_1950_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/da0d61871f6b/41746_2025_1950_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/d280771f8ae9/41746_2025_1950_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/bfdeb1d4f8cc/41746_2025_1950_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/976a715f8085/41746_2025_1950_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/9e9af409a4a4/41746_2025_1950_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/3d119a8307a9/41746_2025_1950_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/c43277f7f628/41746_2025_1950_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/89c655d01f03/41746_2025_1950_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/866abe48eea3/41746_2025_1950_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5887/12402068/ae41ad3681f3/41746_2025_1950_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolutionary game analysis of healthcare data governance in China's experimental data trading pilots.中国实验性数据交易试点中医疗数据治理的演化博弈分析
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Sep 1;8(1):562. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01950-2.
2
Policy optimization for high-quality development and openness of China's healthcare sector: a tripartite evolutionary game based on wholly foreign-owned hospitals, public hospitals and the government.中国医疗卫生行业高质量发展与开放的政策优化:基于独资医院、公立医院和政府的三方演化博弈
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 13;13:1594684. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1594684. eCollection 2025.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
China's coordinated tripartite medical reform: strategic balancing of interests among pharmaceuticals, healthcare, and health insurance.中国的三方协同医疗改革:药品、医疗服务和医疗保险之间利益的战略平衡。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 11;13:1591358. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1591358. eCollection 2025.
5
A study on collaborative governance of excessive medical care based on three-way evolutionary game and simulation.基于三方演化博弈与仿真的过度医疗协同治理研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 17;13:1593398. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1593398. eCollection 2025.
6
The impact of wage structure and ability on the incentives for practitioners to engage in primary care in China: a mathematical analysis based on the incentive mechanism of heterogeneous practitioners and tripartite evolutionary game.工资结构与能力对中国从业者从事基层医疗服务激励的影响:基于异质性从业者激励机制与三方演化博弈的数理分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 18;13:1527676. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1527676. eCollection 2025.
7
[Three-party game and simulation analysis of health-related information quality regulation in public health emergencies].[突发公共卫生事件中健康相关信息质量监管的三方博弈与仿真分析]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Jun 18;57(3):514-521. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.03.015.
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
10
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Sharing data matters: exploring the attitudes of older consumers on an emerging healthy ageing data platform using electronic health records for research.数据共享至关重要:利用电子健康记录进行研究,探索老年消费者对新兴健康老龄化数据平台的态度。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 Jan 2;32(1):e101126. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101126.
2
Moral hazard and risk adjustment.道德风险与风险调整
J Health Econ. 2025 Jan;99:102955. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102955. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
3
Dicing with data: the risks, benefits, tensions and tech of health data in the iToBoS project.
与数据博弈:iToBoS 项目中健康数据的风险、益处、矛盾与技术
Front Digit Health. 2024 Jan 31;6:1272709. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1272709. eCollection 2024.
4
The future of theoretical evolutionary game theory.理论进化博弈论的未来。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 May 8;378(1876):20210508. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0508. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
5
Evidence-based guiding principles to build public trust in personal data use in health systems.建立公众对卫生系统中个人数据使用信任的循证指导原则。
Digit Health. 2022 Jul 17;8:20552076221111947. doi: 10.1177/20552076221111947. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
6
Study on the effect of digital economy on high-quality economic development in China.数字经济对中国高质量经济发展的影响研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 21;16(9):e0257365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257365. eCollection 2021.
7
Privacy-preserving data sharing infrastructures for medical research: systematization and comparison.用于医学研究的隐私保护数据共享基础架构:系统梳理与比较。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Aug 12;21(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01602-x.
8
Understanding "Internet Plus Healthcare" in China: Policy Text Analysis.理解中国的“互联网+医疗健康”:政策文本分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 26;23(7):e23779. doi: 10.2196/23779.
9
Patient Perceptions on Data Sharing and Applying Artificial Intelligence to Health Care Data: Cross-sectional Survey.患者对数据共享和将人工智能应用于医疗保健数据的看法:横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 26;23(8):e26162. doi: 10.2196/26162.
10
Ensuring that the NHS realises fair financial value from its data.
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Jan;2(1):e10-e12. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30225-0. Epub 2019 Dec 23.