Faculty of Nursing, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Vocational School of Health Services, Balıkesir University, Balikesir, Turkey.
J Asthma. 2024 Sep;61(9):1006-1014. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2024.2319846. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
YouTube has educational videos on inhalers. However, their content and quality are not adequately known.
This study investigated the quality and content of educational YouTube videos on inhalers.
This descriptive study analyzed 178 YouTube videos on inhalers between May and July 2022. Two researchers independently evaluated the videos. The Global Quality Score (GQS), Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria, and Inhaler Application Checklist (IAC) were used to assess the quality and content of the videos. Spearman's correlation, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, ANOVA, and Post hoc analysis Bonferroni test were used for data analysis.
The videos had a mean GQS score of 3.70 ± 1.24, and JAMA score of 2.22 ± 0.60. A negative correlation was between the quality score of the videos and views, likes, comments, duration, and likes/views (respectively; = -0.237 < 0.005, = -0.217 < 0.003, = -0.220 < 0.005, = -0.147, < 0.005). The videos narrated by nurses and doctors had significantly higher mean JAMA and GQS scores than others ( = 0.001). The videos missed some procedural steps [gargling (29.1%), adding no more than five ml of medication and device cleaning (41.9%), and exhaling through the nose (37.5%)]. Videos uploaded by individual missed significantly more procedural steps than professional organizations ( < 0.05).
YouTube videos about inhaler techniques have a moderate level of quality. Videos uploaded by doctors and nurses as content narrators were of higher quality. The videos missed some procedural steps. Individual video uploaders had higher missed procedural steps. Counseling should be provided to patients regarding the reliability of online information.
YouTube 上有关于吸入器的教育视频。然而，其内容和质量尚不清楚。
本研究调查了 YouTube 上关于吸入器的教育视频的质量和内容。
本描述性研究于 2022 年 5 月至 7 月分析了 178 个 YouTube 上关于吸入器的视频。两名研究人员独立评估了视频。使用全球质量评分（GQS）、美国医学协会（JAMA）基准标准和吸入器应用检查表（IAC）评估视频的质量和内容。采用 Spearman 相关分析、Kruskal-Wallis 检验、Mann-Whitney U 检验、方差分析和事后 Bonferroni 检验进行数据分析。
视频的平均 GQS 得分为 3.70±1.24，JAMA 得分为 2.22±0.60。视频的质量评分与观看次数、点赞数、评论数、时长和点赞数/观看次数呈负相关（分别为 = -0.237 < 0.005， = -0.217 < 0.003， = -0.220 < 0.005， = -0.147， < 0.005）。由护士和医生解说的视频的平均 JAMA 和 GQS 评分显著高于其他视频（ = 0.001）。视频遗漏了一些操作步骤[漱口（29.1%）、药物添加不超过 5 毫升和设备清洁（41.9%）以及通过鼻子呼气（37.5%）]。个人上传的视频比专业组织遗漏的操作步骤明显更多（ < 0.05）。
YouTube 上关于吸入器技术的视频质量中等。由医生和护士作为内容解说员的视频质量更高。视频遗漏了一些操作步骤。个人视频上传者遗漏的操作步骤更多。应向患者提供有关在线信息可靠性的咨询。
