Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge, UK.
Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge, UK.
Am J Transplant. 2024 Jul;24(7):1247-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.02.008. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
The time to arrest donors after circulatory death is unpredictable and can vary. This leads to variable periods of warm ischemic damage prior to pancreas transplantation. There is little evidence supporting procurement team stand-down times based on donor time to death (TTD). We examined what impact TTD had on pancreas graft outcomes following donors after circulatory death (DCD) simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Data were extracted from the UK transplant registry from 2014 to 2022. Predictors of graft loss were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Adjusted restricted cubic spline models were generated to further delineate the relationship between TTD and outcome. Three-hundred-and-seventy-five DCD simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients were included. Increasing TTD was not associated with graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio HR 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.68-1.41, P = .901). Increasing asystolic time worsened graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 2.51, 95% confidence interval 1.16-5.43, P = .020). Restricted cubic spline modeling revealed a nonlinear relationship between asystolic time and graft survival and no relationship between TTD and graft survival. We found no evidence that TTD impacts pancreas graft survival after DCD simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation; however, increasing asystolic time was a significant predictor of graft loss. Procurement teams should attempt to minimize asystolic time to optimize pancreas graft survival rather than focus on the duration of TTD.
在循环死亡后,逮捕供体的时间是不可预测的,并且可能会有所不同。这导致在胰腺移植前,供体经历了不同时间的热缺血损伤。几乎没有证据支持根据供体死亡时间 (TTD) 来确定采购团队的待命时间。我们研究了 TTD 对循环死亡 (DCD) 后同时进行胰腺-肾移植的供体的胰腺移植物结局的影响。数据是从 2014 年到 2022 年从英国移植登记处提取的。使用 Cox 比例风险模型评估了移植物丢失的预测因素。生成了调整后的限制三次样条模型,以进一步描绘 TTD 与结局之间的关系。纳入了 375 例 DCD 同时进行的肾-胰腺移植受者。TTD 的增加与移植物存活率无关(调整后的危险比 HR 0.98,95%置信区间 0.68-1.41,P =.901)。心脏停搏时间的增加使移植物存活率恶化(调整后的危险比 2.51,95%置信区间 1.16-5.43,P =.020)。限制三次样条模型显示,心脏停搏时间与移植物存活率之间存在非线性关系,而 TTD 与移植物存活率之间没有关系。我们没有发现 TTD 对 DCD 同时进行的胰腺-肾移植后的胰腺移植物存活率有影响的证据;然而,心脏停搏时间的增加是移植物丢失的一个重要预测因素。采购团队应尽量减少心脏停搏时间,以优化胰腺移植物的存活率,而不是关注 TTD 的持续时间。