Angiolab Laboratório Vascular, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital Mater Dei, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 May;12(3):101851. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101851. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
Pelvic venous reflux may be responsible for pelvic venous disorders and/or lower-limb (LL) varicose veins. Ultrasound investigation with Doppler allows a complete study of the entire infra-diaphragmatic venous reservoir. The aim of this study was to guide and standardize the investigation of the pelvic origin of venous reflux in female patients with LL varicose veins.
In this case-control study, we applied a comprehensive ultrasound investigation protocol, which involved four steps: (1) venous mapping of the lower limbs; (2) transperineal and vulvar approach; (3) transabdominal approach; and (4) transvaginal approach.
Forty-four patients in group 1 (patients with LL varicose veins and pelvic escape points [PEPs]) and 35 patients in group 2 (patients with LL varicose veins without PEPs [control group]) were studied, matched by age. The median age was 43 years in both groups. The calculated body mass index was lower in group 1 (23.4 kg/m) compared with the control group (25.4 kg/m), and this difference reached statistical significance (P < .001). The presence of pelvic varicose veins (PVs) by transvaginal ultrasound was 86% in group 1 and 31% in group 2. Perineal PEPs were the most prevalent, being found in 35 patients (79.5%), more frequent on the right (57.14%) than on the left (42.85%) and associated with bilateral PVs 65.7% of the time. In group 1, 23 patients (52%) reported recurrent varicose veins vs eight patients (23%) in the control group (P = .008). Regarding the complaint of dyspareunia, a significant difference was identified between the groups (P = .019), being reported in 10 (23%) patients in group 1 vs one patient (2.9%) in the control group. The median diameters in the transabdominal approach of the left gonadal veins were 6.70 mm for group 1 and 4.60 mm for group 2 (P < .001). In patients with PVs in group 1, the median diameter of PEPs at the trans-perineal window was 4.05 mm. In the transvaginal examination, the mean diameter of the veins in the peri uterine region was 8.71 mm on the left and 7.04 mm on the right.
The identification of PEPs by venous mapping demonstrates the pelvic origin of the reflux and its connections with the LL varicose veins. For a more adequate treatment plan, we suggest a complete investigation protocol based on the transabdominal and transvaginal study to rule out venous obstructions, thrombotic or not, and confirm the presence of varicose veins in the pelvic adnexal region.
盆腔静脉反流可能是导致盆腔静脉疾病和/或下肢(LL)静脉曲张的原因。多普勒超声检查可对整个膈下静脉储器进行全面研究。本研究旨在指导和规范女性下肢静脉曲张患者盆腔反流源的超声检查。
在这项病例对照研究中,我们应用了一种综合超声检查方案,包括四个步骤:(1)下肢静脉映射;(2)经会阴和外阴入路;(3)经腹入路;(4)经阴道入路。
44 例组 1(下肢静脉曲张伴盆腔逃逸点[PEP])患者和 35 例组 2(下肢静脉曲张无 PEP[对照组])患者按年龄匹配。两组的中位年龄均为 43 岁。计算的体重指数在组 1(23.4kg/m)中低于对照组(25.4kg/m),差异具有统计学意义(P<.001)。组 1 中经阴道超声显示盆腔静脉曲张(PVs)的比例为 86%,组 2 为 31%。会阴 PEP 最为常见,35 例(79.5%)患者存在,右侧(57.14%)多于左侧(42.85%),双侧 PVs 伴 PEP 占 65.7%。组 1 中有 23 例(52%)患者报告复发性静脉曲张,对照组有 8 例(23%)(P=.008)。关于性交困难的主诉,两组之间存在显著差异(P=.019),组 1 中有 10 例(23%)患者报告,对照组有 1 例(2.9%)患者报告(P=.019)。组 1 中左侧性腺静脉经腹入路的中位直径为 6.70mm,组 2 为 4.60mm(P<.001)。在组 1 中存在 PVs 的患者中,经会阴窗的 PEP 中位直径为 4.05mm。在经阴道检查中,子宫周围区域静脉的平均直径左侧为 8.71mm,右侧为 7.04mm。
通过静脉映射识别 PEP 可显示反流的盆腔起源及其与下肢静脉曲张的关系。为了制定更充分的治疗计划,我们建议基于经腹和经阴道研究的完整检查方案,以排除静脉阻塞,包括血栓性和非血栓性,并确认盆腔附件区域存在静脉曲张。