University of Münster, Germany; University of Vienna, Austria.
University of Münster, Germany.
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Aug;33(6):740-756. doi: 10.1177/09636625241227800. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
In the context of science communication, complexity is often reduced. This study employs a 2 × 2 experimental design ( = 432) to investigate how two factors, namely the communication of complexity (reduced vs not reduced) and the provision of suggestions for concrete action (suggested vs not suggested), influence individuals' productive engagement with the socio-scientific topic of sustainable energy. Measured variables include topic-specific intellectual humility, judgements of source trustworthiness, willingness to act, anxiety, and hope. As expected, communication of complexity led to higher topic-specific intellectual humility, higher epistemic trustworthiness and higher anxiety. When a concrete action was communicated, participants reported lower topic-specific intellectual humility. Participants' willingness to act was not significantly affected by the experimental manipulation. The results of the study imply that the communication of complexity does not hinder people's productive engagement with science.
在科学传播的背景下,复杂性往往被简化。本研究采用 2×2 实验设计(n=432),调查了两个因素,即复杂性的沟通(简化与不简化)和具体行动建议的提供(建议与不建议),如何影响个体对可持续能源这一社会科学主题的积极参与。测量变量包括特定主题的知识谦逊、对来源可信度的判断、行动意愿、焦虑和希望。正如预期的那样,沟通复杂性导致特定主题的知识谦逊度更高,认知可信度更高,焦虑感更高。当传达具体行动时,参与者报告的特定主题知识谦逊度较低。实验操作对参与者的行动意愿没有显著影响。研究结果表明,沟通复杂性并不会阻碍人们积极参与科学。