Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania.
Human Early Leaning Partnership, University of British Columbia.
J Pers Assess. 2022 Sep-Oct;104(5):573-585. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1975725. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
During the last decade, intellectual humility has gone from a topic of philosophical inquiry to one of serious scientific investigation. It has been variously described as a remedy for political polarization, a tool for advancing scientific credibility, and a disposition that promotes learning. However, less attention has been paid to how intellectual humility has been defined and measured or how well psychologists' definitions and measures align with one another or with philosophers' accounts. Through a systematic review of empirical intellectual humility research, we identified 18 separate definitions and 20 measures including16 unique questionnaires. We then synthesized this research to advance a new framework of intellectual humility. Implications of this framework for measurement and future research on intellectual humility are discussed.
在过去的十年中，理智谦逊已经从哲学探究的主题转变为严肃的科学研究主题。它被描述为克服政治两极分化的方法，提高科学可信度的工具以及促进学习的态度。然而，人们对理智谦逊的定义和衡量方式关注较少，也很少关注心理学家的定义和衡量方式与哲学家的观点是否一致。通过对实证理智谦逊研究的系统回顾，我们确定了 18 个单独的定义和 20 个衡量标准，其中包括 16 个独特的问卷。然后，我们综合这些研究结果提出了一个理智谦逊的新框架。本文讨论了该框架对理智谦逊测量和未来研究的意义。
