• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在加拿大安大略省分发 Lucira Check-It® COVID 自检试剂盒的真实世界结果:GetaKit COVID 研究。

Real world outcomes of distributing Lucira Check-It® COVID self-tests in Ontario, Canada: the GetaKit COVID study.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada.

Department of Medicine, School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, 5252 Boulevard de Maisonneuve W., Montréal, QC, H4A 3S5, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 15;24(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17783-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-17783-9
PMID:38360568
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10870641/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Ontario, Canada we developed and implemented an online screening algorithm for the distribution of HIV self-tests, known as GetaKit. During the COVID pandemic, we adapted the GetaKit algorithm to screen for COVID based on population and infection data and distributed COVID rt-LAMP self-tests (using the Lucira Check-It®) to eligible participants.

METHODS

GetaKit/COVID was a prospective observational study that occurred over a 7-month period from September 2021 to April 2022. All potential participants completed an online registration and risk assessment, including demographic information, COVID symptoms and risk factors, and vaccination status. Bivariate comparisons were performed for three outcomes: results reporting status, vaccination status, and COVID diagnosis status. Data were analysed using Chi-Square for categorial covariates and Independent Samples T-Test and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous covariates. Bivariate logistic regression models were applied to examine associations between the covariates and outcomes.

RESULTS

During the study period, we distributed 6469 COVID self-tests to 4160 eligible participants; 46% identified as Black, Indigenous or a Person of Colour (BIPOC). Nearly 70% of participants reported their COVID self-test results; 304 of which were positive. Overall, 91% also reported being vaccinated against COVID. Statistical analysis found living with five or fewer people, having tested for COVID previously, and being fully vaccinated were positive factors in results reporting. For COVID vaccination, people from large urban centers, who identified their ethnicity as white, and who reported previous COVID testing were more likely to be fully vaccinated. Finally, being identified as a contact of someone who had tested positive for COVID and the presence of COVID-related symptoms were found to be positive factors in diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

While most participants who accessed this service were vaccinated against COVID and the majority of diagnoses were identified in participants who had symptoms of, or an exposure to, COVID, our program was able to appropriately link participants to recommended follow-up based on reported risks and results. These findings highlight the utility of online screening algorithms to provide health services, particularly for persons with historical barriers to healthcare access, such as BIPOC or lower-income groups.

摘要

背景

在加拿大安大略省,我们开发并实施了一种用于 HIV 自检分发的在线筛选算法,称为 GetaKit。在 COVID 大流行期间,我们根据人口和感染数据改编了 GetaKit 算法,以筛查 COVID,并向符合条件的参与者分发 COVID rt-LAMP 自检(使用 Lucira Check-It®)。

方法

GetaKit/COVID 是一项前瞻性观察研究,从 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 4 月持续了 7 个月。所有潜在参与者都完成了在线注册和风险评估,包括人口统计信息、COVID 症状和危险因素以及疫苗接种状况。对于三个结果:报告结果状态、疫苗接种状态和 COVID 诊断状态,进行了双变量比较。使用卡方检验进行分类协变量的比较,使用独立样本 T 检验和曼-惠特尼 U 检验进行连续协变量的比较。应用双变量逻辑回归模型检验协变量与结果之间的关系。

结果

在研究期间,我们向 4160 名符合条件的参与者分发了 6469 份 COVID 自检,其中 46%为黑人、原住民或有色人种(BIPOC)。近 70%的参与者报告了他们的 COVID 自检结果;其中 304 份结果为阳性。总体而言,91%的人还报告接种了 COVID 疫苗。统计分析发现,与 5 人或更少的人同住、以前接受过 COVID 检测以及完全接种疫苗是报告结果的积极因素。对于 COVID 疫苗接种,来自大城市中心的人、自认为是白人的人以及报告以前有过 COVID 检测的人更有可能完全接种疫苗。最后,被确定为 COVID 检测呈阳性的人的接触者以及出现 COVID 相关症状是诊断为阳性的因素。

结论

虽然大多数使用该服务的参与者都接种了 COVID 疫苗,而且大多数诊断结果都是在有 COVID 症状或接触 COVID 的参与者中发现的,但我们的计划能够根据报告的风险和结果,为参与者提供适当的后续建议。这些发现强调了在线筛选算法提供卫生服务的实用性,特别是对于那些存在获取医疗保健历史障碍的人,例如 BIPOC 或低收入群体。

相似文献

1
Real world outcomes of distributing Lucira Check-It® COVID self-tests in Ontario, Canada: the GetaKit COVID study.在加拿大安大略省分发 Lucira Check-It® COVID 自检试剂盒的真实世界结果:GetaKit COVID 研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 15;24(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17783-9.
2
Delivering COVID self-tests through GetaKit.ca: Creating testing access during a pandemic.通过 GetaKit.ca 提供 COVID 自我检测:在大流行期间创造检测机会。
Public Health Nurs. 2023 May-Jun;40(3):404-409. doi: 10.1111/phn.13168. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
HIV self-testing in cis women in Canada: The GetaKit study.加拿大顺性别女性中的艾滋病毒自我检测:GetaKit研究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251322810. doi: 10.1177/17455057251322810. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
5
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the remote early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、交叉试验,旨在研究可穿戴设备对远程早期检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-RED)的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05241-5.
6
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the Remote Early Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、交叉试验,旨在研究可穿戴设备对 SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-RED)的远程早期检测的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Oct 11;22(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05643-5.
7
HIV self-testing in Ottawa, Canada used by persons at risk for HIV: The GetaKit study.加拿大渥太华有感染艾滋病毒风险的人群使用的艾滋病毒自我检测:GetaKit研究。
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2021 Oct 14;47(10):435-441. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v47i10a06.
8
Targeted HIV Self-Testing Identifies Persons with Undiagnosed HIV and Active Engagement Links them to Care: The GetaKit Study.目标性 HIV 自我检测发现未确诊 HIV 感染者并积极促使他们接受治疗:GetaKit 研究。
AIDS Behav. 2024 Jun;28(6):2015-2022. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04302-5. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
9
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
10
HIV self-testing enabled access to testing for Black persons: The GetaKit study.艾滋病毒自我检测使黑人能够进行检测:GetaKit研究。
Res Nurs Health. 2023 Apr;46(2):236-241. doi: 10.1002/nur.22293. Epub 2022 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a novel university-based testing platform to increase access to SARS-CoV-2 testing during the COVID-19 pandemic in a cohort study.评估一种新的基于大学的检测平台,以增加在 COVID-19 大流行期间对 SARS-CoV-2 检测的机会:一项队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 4;14(6):e081837. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081837.

本文引用的文献

1
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and or queer patient experiences in Canadian primary care and emergency departments: a literature review.加拿大初级保健和急诊部门的男同性恋、女同性恋、双性恋、跨性别或酷儿患者体验:文献综述。
Cult Health Sex. 2023 Dec;25(12):1707-1724. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2023.2176548. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
2
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Black Communities in Canada.新冠疫情对加拿大黑人社区的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 15;20(2):1580. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021580.
3
Delivering COVID self-tests through GetaKit.ca: Creating testing access during a pandemic.通过 GetaKit.ca 提供 COVID 自我检测:在大流行期间创造检测机会。
Public Health Nurs. 2023 May-Jun;40(3):404-409. doi: 10.1111/phn.13168. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
4
What is the health impact of COVID-19 among Black communities in Canada? A systematic review.加拿大黑人群体中 COVID-19 的健康影响是什么?一项系统评价。
Can J Public Health. 2023 Feb;114(1):62-71. doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00725-6. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
5
The Traumatizing Impact of Racism in Canadians of Colour.种族主义对有色人种加拿大人造成的创伤性影响。
Curr Trauma Rep. 2022;8(2):17-34. doi: 10.1007/s40719-022-00225-5. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
6
Automated STI/HIV risk assessments: Testing an online clinical algorithm in Ottawa, Canada.自动化性传播感染/艾滋病风险评估:在加拿大渥太华测试在线临床算法。
Int J STD AIDS. 2021 Dec;32(14):1365-1373. doi: 10.1177/09564624211031322. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
7
At-home HIV self-testing during COVID: implementing the GetaKit project in Ottawa.新冠疫情期间的家庭 HIV 自检:在渥太华实施 GetaKit 项目。
Can J Public Health. 2021 Aug;112(4):587-594. doi: 10.17269/s41997-021-00505-8. Epub 2021 May 17.
8
Telehealth Benefits and Barriers.远程医疗的益处与障碍。
J Nurse Pract. 2021 Feb;17(2):218-221. doi: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.09.013. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
9
Digital advantage in the COVID-19 response: perspective from Canada's largest integrated digitalized healthcare system.新冠疫情应对中的数字优势:来自加拿大最大的综合数字化医疗系统的视角
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Aug 31;3:114. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00326-y. eCollection 2020.
10
Virtual care: Enhancing access or harming care?虚拟医疗:增加可及性还是损害医疗服务?
Healthc Manage Forum. 2020 Nov;33(6):288-292. doi: 10.1177/0840470420938818. Epub 2020 Jul 20.