Chhina Manveer Singh
Dental Core Trainee 4, Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Evid Based Dent. 2024 Jun;25(2):69-70. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-00985-w. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
This systematic review investigates the association between peri-implantitis, an infectious/inflammatory disease sharing clinical and radiographic characteristics with periodontitis, and systemic inflammation.
This study, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, systematically reviewed available evidence up to February 9, 2023. Searches were carried out across eight electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source, Scopus, LILACS, and China Online), ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and gray literature.
The review encompasses human studies, including randomised controlled trials, non-randomised intervention studies, cohort studies, case-control, and cross-sectional studies, yielded 27 full-text articles, with 11 clinical studies meeting inclusion criteria, and 9 articles included in the meta-analysis.
Two independent reviewers carried out data extraction using the PECOS /PICOS tool (Patients, Exposure, Comparison, Outcomes, Study designs). The evaluation of the quality and risk of bias in observational studies, randomised controlled trials, and non-randomised studies of interventions was conducted utilising the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), the revised Cochrane tool (RoB 2), and the ROBINS-I tool, respectively. Qualitative and quantitative analyses, including weighted mean differences (WMDs) and standard mean differences (SMD), were conducted using Stata/MP 17.0. Heterogeneity was assessed with the Q-statistic method. Pooled estimates, addressing potential inter-study heterogeneity, were calculated with random effects models. Significance criteria were set at p < 0.05. Publication bias was examined via funnel plot and Egger's test. Sensitivity analyses were predefined. Meta-analyses adhered to GRADE approach for inflammatory biomarkers/outcomes evaluation.
Patients with peri-implantitis exhibited elevated levels of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) (standard mean difference (SMD): 4.68, 98.7% CI: 2.12 to 7.25), interleukin-6 (IL-6) (weighted mean difference (WMD): 6.27 pg/mL, 0% CI: 5.01 to 7.54), and white blood cell counts (WMD: 1.16 * 103/mL, 0% CI: 0.61 to 1.70) compared to those without peri-implantitis.
The findings underscore a significant link between peri-implantitis and heightened systemic inflammation, emphasising the need for further research to elucidate the precise nature of this association.
本系统评价研究了种植体周围炎(一种与牙周炎具有临床和影像学特征的感染性/炎症性疾病)与全身炎症之间的关联。
本研究遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,系统回顾了截至2023年2月9日的现有证据。检索了八个电子数据库(Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、MEDLINE、EMBASE、科学网、牙科学与口腔科学资源库、Scopus、拉丁美洲和加勒比卫生科学数据库以及中国知网)、ClinicalTrials.gov、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)以及灰色文献。
该评价涵盖人类研究,包括随机对照试验、非随机干预研究、队列研究、病例对照研究和横断面研究,共获得27篇全文文章,其中11项临床研究符合纳入标准,9篇文章纳入Meta分析。
两名独立的评审员使用PECOS/PICOS工具(患者、暴露因素、对照、结局、研究设计)进行数据提取。分别使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)、修订后的Cochrane工具(RoB 2)和ROBINS-I工具对观察性研究、随机对照试验和非随机干预研究的质量和偏倚风险进行评估。使用Stata/MP 17.0进行定性和定量分析,包括加权平均差(WMD)和标准化平均差(SMD)。采用Q统计方法评估异质性。采用随机效应模型计算考虑潜在研究间异质性的合并估计值。显著性标准设定为p<0.05。通过漏斗图和Egger检验检查发表偏倚。预先定义了敏感性分析。Meta分析遵循GRADE方法评估炎症生物标志物/结局。
与无种植体周围炎的患者相比,种植体周围炎患者的血清C反应蛋白(CRP)水平升高(标准化平均差(SMD):4.68,98.7%CI:2.12至7.25)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)水平升高(加权平均差(WMD):6.27 pg/mL,0%CI:5.01至7.54)以及白细胞计数升高(WMD:1.16×10³/mL,0%CI:0.61至1.70)。
研究结果强调了种植体周围炎与全身炎症加剧之间的显著联系,强调需要进一步研究以阐明这种关联的确切性质。