Adjunct Research Professor, Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Assistant Professor and Director of the Evidence-Based Practice Unit, Ajman University College of Dentistry, Ajman City, UAE.
Evid Based Dent. 2023 Sep;24(3):118-120. doi: 10.1038/s41432-023-00913-4. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
A systematic appraisal and statistical aggregation of primary studies in humans.
The researchers utilized PubMed (Medline) and Scopus databases as the primary data sources for this study. They performed a comprehensive literature search based on free keywords and Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms to enhance the search accuracy. The database search was concluded on November 13, 2022. Furthermore, a meticulous examination of the references cited in the selected studies was conducted to identify additional relevant articles that could be incorporated into the analysis.
The systematic review focused on partially or fully edentulous patients receiving dental implants and aimed to determine if the lack of keratinized mucosa at the implant site increased the risk of peri-implantitis compared to patients with adequate keratinized mucosa. Human studies with a minimum of 100 implants, cross-sectional, cohort, or case-control designs, and a follow-up period of at least one year were included. Studies lacking a clear case definition or information on peri-implantitis and those that did not investigate keratinized mucosa as a risk indicator were excluded.
Two reviewers independently utilized a systematic review screening website (Rayyan, Qatar Computing Research Institute, Qatar Foundation) to select potential articles, and conflicts were resolved through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer. The data extraction process involved recording information from the included articles, such as study design, patient and implant numbers, prosthesis type (fixed or removable), follow-up duration, peri-implantitis case definition, prevalence at patient and implant levels, keratinized mucosa cutoff value, odds ratio (OR) of peri-implantitis considering keratinized mucosa, and conclusions on the potential effect of keratinized mucosa from each study. The Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS) and a modified version of NOS were used, respectively, to assess the quality of cohort and cross-sectional studies. Studies scoring below 6 out of 9 points were classified as low quality. For the meta-analysis, the relationship between peri-implantitis and keratinized mucosa was evaluated using the odds ratio (OR) and standard error (SE). Heterogeneity was assessed through the Chi test and I index, determining whether a random-effects or fixed-effects model should be applied. Subgroup and cluster analyses were conducted based on specific criteria, and forest plots and funnel plots were generated to visualize results and identify potential study bias. Sensitivity analysis was performed to verify the robustness of the meta-analysis, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. The Review Manager (RevMan) software facilitated data analysis. The GRADE rating system was used to determine the level of evidence, considering factors such as bias risk, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, and publication bias. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated based on the overall outcomes of analyzed subgroups.
Twenty-two primary studies were identified, and a meta-analysis was conducted on 16 cross-sectional studies. The prevalence of peri-implantitis ranged from 6.68% to 62.3% at the patient level and from 4.5% to 58.1% at the implant level. The overall analysis revealed a significant association between the lack of keratinized mucosa and a higher prevalence of peri-implantitis (OR = 2.78, 95% CI 2.07-3.74, p < 0.00001). Subgroup analyses with a consistent case definition of peri-implantitis (MBL ≥ 2 mm) showed similar results (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.41-2.73, p < 0.0001). Studies focusing on fixed prostheses only demonstrated that the lack of keratinized mucosa was associated with an increased prevalence of peri-implantitis (OR = 2.82, 95% CI 1.85-4.28, p < 0.00001). Among patients under regular implant maintenance, the absence of keratinized mucosa significantly raised the occurrence of peri-implantitis (OR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.41-3.08, p = 0.0002). Studies adjusting for other variables also confirmed a higher risk of peri-implantitis with inadequate keratinized mucosa (OR = 3.68, 95% CI 2.32-5.82, p = 0.007). Although some publication bias was observed, the certainty of evidence based on the GRADE system was judged to be "moderate."
The lack of keratinized mucosa increased the risk of peri-implantitis, emphasizing the need to consider it during dental implant placement. Inadequate data on patient-specific factors and the predominance of cross-sectional studies influenced the evidence quality (i.e., moderate). Future studies with consistent methodologies shall confirm these findings and identify additional risk indicators to improve implant dentistry practices.
对人类主要研究进行系统评价和统计汇总。
研究人员利用 PubMed(Medline)和 Scopus 数据库作为本研究的主要数据来源。他们基于自由关键词和医学主题词(MeSH)术语进行了全面的文献搜索,以提高搜索的准确性。数据库搜索于 2022 年 11 月 13 日结束。此外,还仔细检查了所选研究中引用的参考文献,以确定是否有其他相关文章可以纳入分析。
系统评价侧重于部分或完全无牙患者接受牙种植体,并旨在确定与具有足够角化黏膜的患者相比,种植体部位缺乏角化黏膜是否会增加患种植体周围炎的风险。本研究纳入了至少有 100 个种植体、横断面、队列或病例对照设计且随访期至少为一年的人类研究。排除了缺乏明确的病例定义或关于种植体周围炎信息以及未将角化黏膜作为风险指标进行研究的研究。
两名审查员独立使用系统评价筛选网站(卡塔尔计算研究所以及卡塔尔基金会的 Rayyan)来选择潜在的文章,并通过讨论或与第三名审查员协商解决冲突。数据提取过程涉及记录纳入文章中的信息,如研究设计、患者和种植体数量、修复体类型(固定或可摘)、随访时间、种植体周围炎的病例定义、患者和种植体水平的患病率、角化黏膜临界值、考虑角化黏膜时种植体周围炎的优势比(OR)以及来自每项研究的角化黏膜潜在影响的结论。分别使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)和 NOS 的修改版来评估队列研究和横断面研究的质量。评分低于 9 分中的 6 分的研究被归类为低质量。对于荟萃分析,使用优势比(OR)和标准误差(SE)评估种植体周围炎与角化黏膜之间的关系。通过 Chi 检验和 I 指数评估异质性,确定是否应应用随机效应或固定效应模型。根据特定标准进行亚组和聚类分析,并生成森林图和漏斗图以可视化结果并识别潜在的研究偏倚。进行敏感性分析以验证荟萃分析的稳健性,统计学显著性设置为 p < 0.05。RevMan 软件用于数据分析。使用 GRADE 评级系统确定证据水平,考虑偏倚风险、不精确性、不一致性、间接性和发表偏倚等因素。根据分析亚组的总体结果评估证据的确定性。
确定了 22 项主要研究,并对 16 项横断面研究进行了荟萃分析。患者水平的种植体周围炎患病率范围为 6.68%至 62.3%,种植体水平的患病率范围为 4.5%至 58.1%。总体分析显示,缺乏角化黏膜与种植体周围炎患病率较高之间存在显著关联(OR=2.78,95%CI 2.07-3.74,p<0.00001)。采用一致的种植体周围炎病例定义(MBL≥2mm)的亚组分析得出了类似的结果(OR=1.96,95%CI 1.41-2.73,p<0.0001)。仅关注固定修复体的研究表明,缺乏角化黏膜与种植体周围炎患病率增加相关(OR=2.82,95%CI 1.85-4.28,p<0.00001)。在接受定期种植体维护的患者中,缺乏角化黏膜显著增加了种植体周围炎的发生(OR=2.08,95%CI 1.41-3.08,p=0.0002)。调整其他变量的研究也证实了角化黏膜不足与种植体周围炎风险增加之间存在更高的关联(OR=3.68,95%CI 2.32-5.82,p=0.007)。尽管观察到一些发表偏倚,但基于 GRADE 系统评估的证据确定性被判断为“中等”。
缺乏角化黏膜增加了种植体周围炎的风险,强调在放置牙种植体时应考虑这一点。患者特定因素的数据不足以及横断面研究的主导地位影响了证据质量(即中等)。未来具有一致方法学的研究应证实这些发现并确定其他风险指标,以改善种植牙实践。