Suppr超能文献

系统抗生素辅助治疗种植体周围炎的疗效:系统评价。

The efficacy of systemic antibiotics as an adjunct to surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Dentistry - Periodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Aarstadveien 19, 5009, Bergen, Norway.

Division of Oral Diagnostics and Oral Rehabilitation, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Medical Unit for Reconstructive Plastic- and Craniofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2021 Dec 27;21(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-02020-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Microbial biofilm accumulation is the main cause of peri-implantitis. The majority of surgical peri-implantitis treatment protocols suggests adjunctive use of systemic antibiotics to target specific putative bacteria. The aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the adjunctive use of systemically administered antibiotics in surgical treatment of peri-implantitis by reviewing previously published systematic reviews and primary studies.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in four electronic databases (MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science) for randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and systematic reviews reporting surgical treatment of peri-implantitis with and without adjunctive systemically administered antibiotic therapy. The included systematic reviews and primary studies were qualitatively assessed using AMSTAR and GRADE, respectively. No restrictions were set for date of publication, journal, or language.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 681 papers. Only seven systematic reviews and two primary studies met the inclusion criteria. Four out of seven included systematic reviews concluded that no evidence exists for use of systemic antibiotics to improve the clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. One review did not estimate the level of evidence, one did not clearly state any beneficial effect, whereas one reported a limited adjunctive effect. Further, the two included primary studies did not show a long-term significant benefit of adjunctive use of systemically administrated antibiotics. However, one study reported a short-term adjunctive effect in patients with modified surface implants. Due to heterogeneity in study design, low number of included primary studies, and grade of bias, no meta-analysis was performed.

CONCLUSION

The use of systemically administered antibiotics as an adjunct to surgical interventions of peri-implantitis cannot be justified as a part of a standard treatment protocol. A pervasive problem is the lack of uniform diagnosis criteria for peri-implantitis, deficient information about patient characteristics, absence of high quality long-term randomised controlled trials, and authors' declaration on conflict of interest.

摘要

背景

微生物生物膜的积累是导致种植体周围炎的主要原因。大多数种植体周围炎治疗方案建议辅助使用全身抗生素来靶向特定的假定细菌。本系统评价的目的是通过审查先前发表的系统评价和原始研究,批判性地评估全身给予抗生素在种植体周围炎手术治疗中的辅助作用。

方法

在四个电子数据库(MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆、EMBASE 和 Web of Science)中进行了系统文献检索,以查找报告使用和不使用辅助全身给予抗生素治疗种植体周围炎的手术治疗的随机对照试验、队列研究、病例对照研究和系统评价。使用 AMSTAR 和 GRADE 分别对纳入的系统评价和原始研究进行定性评估。未对发表日期、期刊或语言设置任何限制。

结果

文献检索共确定了 681 篇论文。只有 7 篇系统评价和 2 篇原始研究符合纳入标准。7 篇纳入的系统评价中有 4 篇得出结论,没有证据表明使用全身抗生素可以改善种植体周围炎手术治疗的临床结局。一篇综述没有估计证据水平,一篇没有明确说明任何有益效果,而另一篇报告了有限的辅助效果。此外,两项纳入的原始研究并未显示辅助使用全身给予抗生素的长期显著益处。然而,一项研究报告称,在表面改性种植体的患者中,短期辅助使用有辅助作用。由于研究设计、纳入的原始研究数量和偏倚程度存在异质性,因此未进行荟萃分析。

结论

不能将全身给予抗生素作为种植体周围炎手术干预的辅助手段,作为标准治疗方案的一部分。一个普遍存在的问题是缺乏统一的种植体周围炎诊断标准、缺乏关于患者特征的信息、缺乏高质量的长期随机对照试验以及作者对利益冲突的声明。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0847/8711198/e6cd4397b283/12903_2021_2020_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验