Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal and IRICYS, Universidad de Alcalá (UAH), Madrid, Spain.
CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Front Immunol. 2024 Feb 1;15:1343124. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1343124. eCollection 2024.
In people living with HIV (PLHIV), the CD4/CD8 ratio has been proposed as a useful marker for non-AIDS events. However, its predictive ability on mortality over CD4 counts, and the role of CD8+ T-cell counts remain controversial.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies from 1996 to 2023, including PLHIV on antiretroviral treatment, and reporting CD4/CD8 ratio or CD8+ counts. The primary outcome was non-AIDS mortality or all-cause mortality. We performed a standard random-effects pairwise meta-analysis comparing low versus high CD4/CD8 ratio with a predefined cut-off point of 0.5. (CRD42020170931).
We identified 2,479 studies for screening. 20 studies were included in the systematic review. Seven studies found an association between low CD4/CD8 ratio categories and increased mortality risk, with variable cut-off points between 0.4-1. Four studies were selected for meta-analysis, including 12,893 participants and 618 reported deaths. Patients with values of CD4/CD8 ratio below 0.5 showed a higher mortality risk (OR 3.65; 95% CI 3.04 - 4.35; I2 = 0.00%) compared to those with higher values. While the meta-analysis of CD8+ T-cell counts was not feasible due to methodological differences between studies, the systematic review suggests a negative prognostic impact of higher values (>1,138 to 1,500 cells/uL) in the long term.
Our results support the use of the CD4/CD8 ratio as a prognostic marker in clinical practice, especially in patients with values below 0.5, but consensus criteria on ratio timing measurement, cut-off values, and time to event are needed in future studies to get more robust conclusions.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020170931, identifier CRD42020170931.
在艾滋病毒感染者(PLHIV)中,CD4/CD8 比值已被提议作为非艾滋病事件的有用标志物。然而,其对死亡率的预测能力超过 CD4 计数,以及 CD8+T 细胞计数的作用仍存在争议。
我们对 1996 年至 2023 年发表的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,包括接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的 PLHIV,并报告了 CD4/CD8 比值或 CD8+计数。主要结局是非艾滋病相关死亡率或全因死亡率。我们使用标准随机效应成对荟萃分析比较了低与高 CD4/CD8 比值,其中预设的截止点为 0.5。(CRD42020170931)。
我们筛选出 2479 项研究。系统评价纳入 20 项研究。有 7 项研究发现低 CD4/CD8 比值类别与更高的死亡率风险之间存在关联,其截止点在 0.4-1 之间不等。有 4 项研究被纳入荟萃分析,包括 12893 名参与者和 618 例报告的死亡。CD4/CD8 比值低于 0.5 的患者死亡率风险更高(OR 3.65;95%CI 3.04-4.35;I2=0.00%),与比值较高的患者相比。由于研究之间的方法学差异,CD8+T 细胞计数的荟萃分析不可行,但系统评价表明,长期来看,较高值(>1138 至 1500 个细胞/μL)具有负面预后影响。
我们的结果支持在临床实践中使用 CD4/CD8 比值作为预后标志物,特别是在比值低于 0.5 的患者中,但未来的研究需要在比值时间测量、截止值和事件时间方面达成共识标准,以得出更稳健的结论。
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020170931,标识符 CRD42020170931。