Psychology, determinism, and legal responsibility.
作者信息
Morse S J
出版信息
Nebr Symp Motiv. 1985;33:35-85.
PMID:3836359
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Psychology, determinism, and legal responsibility.心理学、决定论与法律责任。
Nebr Symp Motiv. 1985;33:35-85.
2
The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.精神错乱辩护：废除该辩护的影响未得到道德共识的支持。
Am J Law Med. 1984 Winter;9(4):471-500.
3
Morality, equality, and expertise: renegotiating the relationship between psychiatry and the criminal law.道德、平等与专业知识：重新协商精神病学与刑法之间的关系。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1984;12(1):5-20.
4
The Supreme Court and the mentally disabled criminal defendant: recent developments.最高法院与精神残疾刑事被告：近期动态
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1987;15(4):391-409.
5
Mental impairment, moral understanding and criminal responsibility: psychopathy and the purposes of punishment.精神损害、道德理解与刑事责任：心理变态与惩罚目的
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2004 Sep-Oct;27(5):425-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.06.005.
6
Voluntary control of behavior and responsibility.行为的自主控制与责任。
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jan;7(1):12-3. doi: 10.1080/15265160601063993.
7
Justifications for the insanity defence in Great Britain and the United States: the conflicting rationales of morality and compassion.英国和美国精神错乱辩护的理由：道德与同情的相互冲突的基本原理。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1981;9(2):100-15.
8
New perspectives in the legal psychiatry of cocaine-related crimes.
J Forensic Sci. 1992 May;37(3):894-901.
9
Psychiatric aspects of criminal responsibility: insanity and mitigation.刑事责任的精神病学方面：精神错乱与减轻处罚
J Psychiatr Pract. 2011 Nov;17(6):429-31. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000407967.80345.ac.
10
Voluntariness, intention, and the defence of mental disorder: toward a rational approach.自愿性、意图与精神障碍辩护：迈向理性的方法
Behav Sci Law. 2003;21(5):581-99. doi: 10.1002/bsl.552.
Zotero 插件