Kwedi Nolna Sylvie, Mbang Massom Douglas, Tchoteke Louis Aristide, Bille Koffi Aristide, Marchant Mark, Masumbe Netongo Palmer
Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Capacity for Leadership Excellence and Research (CLEAR), Yaoundé, Cameroon.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Feb 16;4(2):e0001760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001760. eCollection 2024.
At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Cameroonian government, to abide by international regulations, prescribed preventive measures, which affected many aspects of social, political, economic, and cultural life. However, there needs to be more in-depth exploration of how communities in Cameroon perceived and were impacted by COVID-19. We explored perceptions and misconceptions concerning COVID-19's impact on urban communities' daily lives in Cameroon. We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with a heterogeneous sample of 25 participants from five different social categories (health personnel, patients with a confirmed COVID-19 infection, close contacts of patients, community members, and community leaders) to assess their perceptions of the disease. Interviews and FGDs were recorded, fully transcribed, coded manually, and analyzed using a thematic analysis iterative coding process. Three main themes were identified: 1) Knowledge of COVID-19: antagonism between disease and invention, 2) Barrier measures imposed by the "dominant culture," and 3) Impact of COVID-19 on daily lives. Our study revealed perceptions around general knowledge of the COVID-19 pandemic, noting acceptance and observation of government-imposed protective measures while highlighting the significant changes endured in participants' daily lives. These findings draw attention to the need to develop flexible and appropriate response strategies for different communities. Although Cameroonian populations were not as intensely affected by the burden of the disease of COVID-19 as other regions, they were still compelled to follow static "cookie-cutter" measures that were internationally imposed, affecting their daily lives in ways that seemed disproportionate to their own experiences of the crisis. These findings have potential implications for the legitimacy of public health institutions and responses.
在新冠疫情爆发之初,喀麦隆政府为遵守国际规定,制定了预防措施,这些措施影响了社会、政治、经济和文化生活的许多方面。然而,对于喀麦隆的社区如何看待新冠疫情以及受到何种影响,仍需要进行更深入的探究。我们探讨了喀麦隆城市社区对新冠疫情影响的看法和误解。我们对来自五个不同社会类别(卫生人员、新冠确诊患者、患者密切接触者、社区成员和社区领袖)的25名参与者组成的异质样本进行了半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论,以评估他们对该疾病的看法。访谈和焦点小组讨论进行了录音、全文转录、手动编码,并使用主题分析迭代编码过程进行分析。确定了三个主要主题:1)对新冠疫情的认知:疾病与发明之间的对立,2)“主流文化”实施的隔离措施,3)新冠疫情对日常生活的影响。我们的研究揭示了围绕新冠疫情普遍认知的看法,指出了对政府实施的保护措施的接受和观察,同时强调了参与者日常生活中所经历的重大变化。这些发现提醒人们需要为不同社区制定灵活且适当的应对策略。尽管喀麦隆民众受到新冠疫情负担的影响不如其他地区严重,但他们仍被迫遵循国际上强制实施的固定“一刀切”措施,这些措施对他们日常生活的影响似乎与他们自身的危机经历不相称。这些发现对公共卫生机构及其应对措施的合法性具有潜在影响。