• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人情绪调节的使用在大流行压力的社会生态层面上存在差异。

Emotion Regulation Use Varies Across Socioecological Levels of Pandemic Stress in Older Adults.

作者信息

Martins-Klein Bruna, Griffith Eric E, Heideman Kristin, Orlovsky Irina, Chen Ziyuan, Alwan Elizabeth

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Clin Gerontol. 2024 Feb 17:1-14. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2024.2316688.

DOI:10.1080/07317115.2024.2316688
PMID:38367001
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11329710/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

COVID-19 escalated stress within family/neighborhood (local) and national/cultural (global) levels. However, the impact of socioecological levels of stress on pandemic emotion regulation remains largely unexplored.

METHODS

Thirty older adults from the Northeast US (63-92 years) reported on pandemic stress and emotion regulation in semi-structured interviews. Responses were coded into socioecological sources of local and global stress, and associated use of cognitive emotion regulation strategies from the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire was explored.

RESULTS

Older adults experienced significant distress at global levels, and perception of lacking top-down safety governance may have exacerbated local distress of engaging in daily activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants endorsed coping with local stressors via perspective-taking, acceptance, and other adaptive strategies, while global sources of stress were associated with greater use of maladaptive strategies, including other-blame and rumination.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative assessments may underestimate significant older adult distress and maladaptive coping toward global stressors. Findings should be replicated with more diverse populations beyond the COVID-19 context.

摘要

目的

新冠疫情加剧了家庭/邻里(局部)和国家/文化(全球)层面的压力。然而,社会生态层面的压力对疫情期间情绪调节的影响在很大程度上仍未得到探索。

方法

来自美国东北部的30名老年人(63 - 92岁)在半结构化访谈中报告了疫情压力和情绪调节情况。回答被编码为局部和全球压力的社会生态来源,并探讨了《认知情绪调节问卷》中相关认知情绪调节策略的使用情况。

结果

老年人在全球层面经历了显著的痛苦,而对缺乏自上而下的安全治理的认知可能加剧了新冠疫情期间参与日常活动的局部痛苦。参与者认可通过换位思考、接纳和其他适应性策略应对局部压力源,而全球压力源与更多地使用适应不良策略相关,包括指责他人和反复思考。

结论

定量评估可能低估了老年人对全球压力源的显著痛苦和适应不良应对。研究结果应在新冠疫情背景之外的更多样化人群中进行重复验证。

相似文献

1
Emotion Regulation Use Varies Across Socioecological Levels of Pandemic Stress in Older Adults.老年人情绪调节的使用在大流行压力的社会生态层面上存在差异。
Clin Gerontol. 2024 Feb 17:1-14. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2024.2316688.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
The impact of COVID-19 fear during the later stages of the pandemic on maladaptive eating, psychological distress and body weight: a global cross-sectional study.新冠疫情后期对适应不良饮食、心理困扰和体重的恐惧影响:一项全球横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):1365. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22444-6.
4
Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception.COVID-19 患者使用激素避孕的血栓栓塞风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 9;1(1):CD014908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014908.pub2.
5
A model of occupational stress to assess impact of COVID-19 on critical care and redeployed nurses: a mixed-methods study.一种评估 COVID-19 对重症护理和重新调配护士影响的职业压力模型:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Dec 18:1-32. doi: 10.3310/PWRT8714.
6
An Examination of Perceived Stress and Emotion Regulation Challenges as Mediators of Associations Between Camouflaging and Internalizing Symptomatology.作为伪装与内化症状学之间关联的中介因素的感知压力和情绪调节挑战的考察
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):345-361. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0121. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
8
Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients.急性住院老年医学患者的运动治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 10;11(11):CD005955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005955.pub3.
9
Effectiveness of family interventions on psychological distress and expressed emotion in family members of individuals diagnosed with first-episode psychosis: a systematic review.家庭干预对首次发作精神病患者家庭成员心理困扰和情感表达的有效性:一项系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Apr;15(4):1057-1079. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003361.
10
Clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for epilepsy in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation.成人癫痫新药的临床疗效、耐受性及成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(15):1-157, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9150.

本文引用的文献

1
Pandemic fatigue fueled political discontent during the COVID-19 pandemic.大流行疲劳在 COVID-19 大流行期间助长了政治不满。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 29;119(48):e2201266119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2201266119. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
2
Emotion regulation strategies and difficulties in older adults: A systematic review.老年人的情绪调节策略与困难:一项系统综述。
Clin Gerontol. 2023 May-Jun;46(3):280-301. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2022.2128706. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
3
Changes in Prevalence and Severity of Domestic Violence During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间家庭暴力的患病率和严重程度变化:一项系统综述
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 13;13:874183. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.874183. eCollection 2022.
4
Psychological well-being, risk factors, and coping strategies with social isolation and new challenges in times of adversity caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.心理健康、风险因素以及应对因 COVID-19 大流行导致的逆境中的社会隔离和新挑战的策略。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 May;225:103538. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103538. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
5
The Age-Related Positivity Effect and Emotion Regulation: Assessing Downstream Affective Outcomes.年龄相关的积极性效应与情绪调节:评估下游情感结果。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2022 Dec;95(4):455-469. doi: 10.1177/00914150221077954. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
6
Do it for others! The role of family and national group social belongingness in engaging with COVID-19 preventive health behaviors.为他人而做!家庭和国家群体社会归属感在参与新冠疫情预防健康行为中的作用。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2022 Jan;98:104241. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104241. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
7
Emotion regulation across the lifespan: age differences in intrapersonal and interpersonal strategies for the adjustment to the COVID-19 pandemic in four countries.毕生的情绪调节:在四个国家中,针对 COVID-19 大流行,年龄差异对个体内和人际策略的调整。
Aging Ment Health. 2022 Oct;26(10):2048-2053. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1972933. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
8
The mediating role of psychological distress on the link between socio-ecological factors and quality of life of Filipino adults during COVID-19 crisis.在 COVID-19 危机期间,菲律宾成年人的社会生态因素与生活质量之间的关系中介作用的心理困扰。
J Community Psychol. 2022 Mar;50(2):712-726. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22668. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
9
Death anxiety in the time of COVID-19: theoretical explanations and clinical implications.新冠疫情时期的死亡焦虑:理论阐释与临床意义
Cogn Behav Therap. 2020 Jun 11;13:e19. doi: 10.1017/S1754470X20000215. eCollection 2020.
10
National identification, a social cure for COVID-19? Evidence from 67 countries.国家识别码能否成为抗击新冠疫情的社会良药?来自 67 个国家的证据。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022 Aug;68(5):1116-1126. doi: 10.1177/00207640211020036. Epub 2021 May 21.