Thiel Freya, Büechl Verena C S, Rehberg Franciska, Mojahed Amera, Daniels Judith K, Schellong Julia, Garthus-Niegel Susan
Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Institute for Systems Medicine (ISM) and Faculty of Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 13;13:874183. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.874183. eCollection 2022.
To contain the spread of COVID-19, governmental measures were implemented in many countries. Initial evidence suggests that women and men experience increased anger and aggression during COVID-19 lockdowns. Not surprisingly, media reports and initial empirical evidence highlight an increased risk for domestic violence (DV) during the pandemic. Nonetheless, a systematic review of studies utilizing participants' reports of potential changes in DV prevalence and severity during the pandemic as compared to pre-pandemic times is needed.
To examine empirical, peer-reviewed studies, pertaining to the potential change in prevalence and severity of different types of DV during the COVID-19 pandemic, as reported by study participants.
Electronic EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL searches were conducted for the period between 2020 and January 5, 2022. References of eligible studies were integrated by using a snowballing technique.
A total of 22 primary, empirical, peer-reviewed studies published in English or German were included.
Of the 22 studies, 19 were cross-sectional whereas 3 included both pre-pandemic and during pandemic assessments. Data synthesis indicates that severity of all types of DV as well as the prevalence of psychological/emotional and sexual DV increased for a significant number of victims in the general population during the pandemic. Evidence for changes in prevalence regarding economic/financial, physical, and overall DV remains inconclusive. There was considerable between-study variation in reported prevalence depending on region, sample size, assessment time, and measure.
Data synthesis partly supports the previously documented increase in DV. Governmental measures should consider the availability of easily accessible, anonymous resources. Awareness and knowledge regarding DV need to be distributed to improve resources and clinical interventions.
为遏制新冠病毒病(COVID-19)的传播,许多国家实施了政府措施。初步证据表明,在COVID-19封锁期间,女性和男性的愤怒和攻击性有所增加。不出所料,媒体报道和初步实证证据凸显了疫情期间家庭暴力(DV)风险的增加。尽管如此,仍需要对利用参与者报告的疫情期间与疫情前相比DV患病率和严重程度潜在变化的研究进行系统综述。
审查经同行评审的实证研究,这些研究涉及研究参与者报告的COVID-19大流行期间不同类型DV的患病率和严重程度的潜在变化。
对2020年至2022年1月5日期间进行了电子EMBASE、MEDLINE、PsycINFO和CINAHL检索。通过滚雪球技术整合符合条件研究的参考文献。
共纳入22项以英文或德文发表的原发性、实证性、经同行评审的研究。
在这22项研究中,19项为横断面研究,3项包括疫情前和疫情期间的评估。数据综合表明,在大流行期间,普通人群中大量受害者遭受的各类DV严重程度以及心理/情感和性DV的患病率均有所增加。关于经济/财务、身体和总体DV患病率变化的证据仍无定论。根据地区、样本量、评估时间和测量方法的不同,各研究报告的患病率存在相当大的差异。
数据综合部分支持了先前记录的DV增加情况。政府措施应考虑提供易于获取的匿名资源。需要传播有关DV的意识和知识,以改善资源和临床干预措施。