Porroche-Escudero Ana
Lancaster University Faculty of Science and Technology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2022 Jul 4;13(1):24-30. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2022.2096487. eCollection 2024.
Gender and sexuality are recognised as social determinants of health. While gender and sexuality are becoming important frameworks guiding many disciplines and studies, discussions about quality of healthcare (QHC) lack a sufficient focus on these. When QHC studies have considered gender and sexuality the primary focus tends to be on the practice of individual professionals, patients' differential health seeking behaviours or outcomes. This commentary eapplies a gender and sexuality lens to Donabedian's framework to further understand the influence of gender and sexuality in shaping QHC. The framework illustrates how the very foundations of QHC (institutional structures, processes and outcomes), can increase or reduce inequalities in QHC linked to gender, sexuality (as well as other factors). The commentary suggests practices that would reduce these inequalities. In the context of present debates over inequality in medicine, science and global health , this commentary is a reminder that health systems have a critical role to play in ensuring that QHC does not perpetuate them. .
性别和性取向被视为健康的社会决定因素。虽然性别和性取向正成为指导许多学科和研究的重要框架,但关于医疗保健质量(QHC)的讨论对这些方面的关注却不够充分。当QHC研究考虑到性别和性取向时,主要关注点往往是个体专业人员的实践、患者不同的就医行为或结果。本评论文章运用性别和性取向视角审视唐纳贝迪安框架,以进一步理解性别和性取向在塑造QHC方面的影响。该框架阐明了QHC的基础(机构结构、过程和结果)如何能够增加或减少与性别、性取向(以及其他因素)相关的QHC不平等现象。评论文章提出了减少这些不平等现象的做法。在当前关于医学、科学和全球健康领域不平等问题的辩论背景下,本评论文章提醒人们,卫生系统在确保QHC不会使这些不平等现象永久化方面可发挥关键作用。