Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene St., Columbia, SC 29208, USA; Prevention Research Center, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Prevention Research Center, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA; Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Appetite. 2024 May 1;196:107280. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107280. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
The Nutritious Eating with Soul study was a 24-month, randomized behavioral nutrition intervention among African American adults. This present study, which is a secondary analysis of the NEW Soul study, examined changes in dietary acceptability, restraint, disinhibition, and hunger. Participants (n = 159; 79% female, 74% with ≥ college degree, mean age 48.4 y) were randomized to either a soul food vegan (n = 77) or soul food omnivorous (n = 82) diet and participated in a two-year behavioral nutrition intervention. Questionnaires assessing dietary acceptability (Food Acceptability Questionnaire; FAQ) and dietary restraint, disinhibition, and hunger (Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire; TFEQ) were completed at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Mixed models were specified with main effects (group and time) and interaction effects (group by time) to estimate mean differences in FAQ and TFEQ scores using intent-to-treat analysis. After adjusting for employment, education, food security status, sex, and age, there were no differences in any of the FAQ items, total FAQ score, dietary restraint, disinhibition, and hunger at any timepoint except for one item of the FAQ at 12 months. Participants in the vegan group reported a greater increase in satisfaction after eating a meal than the omnivorous group (mean difference 0.80 ± 0.32, 95% CI 0.18, 1.42; P = 0.01). This is one of the first studies to examine differences in dietary acceptability, hunger, and other eating factors among African American adults randomized to either a vegan or omnivorous soul food diet. The findings highlight that plant-based eating styles are equally acceptable to omnivorous eating patterns and have similar changes in hunger, restraint, and disinhibition. These results suggest that plant-based eating styles can be an acceptable dietary pattern to recommend for cardiovascular disease prevention and may result in greater post-meal satisfaction.
灵魂饮食滋养研究是一项为期 24 个月的、针对非裔美国成年人的随机行为营养干预研究。本研究是对灵魂饮食滋养研究的二次分析,旨在探讨饮食可接受性、抑制、放纵和饥饿感的变化。参与者(n=159;79%为女性,74%具有大学及以上学历,平均年龄为 48.4 岁)被随机分配到灵魂食物素食(n=77)或灵魂食物杂食(n=82)饮食组,并参加了为期两年的行为营养干预。在基线、3、6、12 和 24 个月时,使用饮食可接受性问卷(Food Acceptability Questionnaire;FAQ)和饮食抑制、放纵和饥饿感问卷(Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire;TFEQ)评估饮食可接受性和饮食抑制、放纵和饥饿感。采用意向治疗分析,指定混合模型具有主效应(组和时间)和交互效应(组与时间),以估计 FAQ 和 TFEQ 评分的平均差异。在调整就业、教育、食品安全状况、性别和年龄后,除了在 12 个月时 FAQ 的一个项目外,在任何时间点都没有发现 FAQ 项目、总 FAQ 评分、饮食抑制、放纵和饥饿感存在差异。素食组参与者在餐后的满意度比杂食组高(平均差异 0.80±0.32,95%CI 0.18,1.42;P=0.01)。这是第一项研究之一,旨在研究随机分配到素食或杂食灵魂食物饮食的非裔美国成年人在饮食可接受性、饥饿和其他饮食因素方面的差异。研究结果强调,植物性饮食方式与杂食性饮食方式同样可接受,且饥饿感、抑制和放纵方面的变化相似。这些结果表明,植物性饮食方式可能是一种可接受的饮食模式,可推荐用于预防心血管疾病,并可能导致餐后满意度更高。