Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, Dawida 1, 50-527 Wroclaw, Poland.
Nutrients. 2020 Jul 17;12(7):2133. doi: 10.3390/nu12072133.
There are a significant number of studies on cognitive restraint among individuals with varying dietary patterns. Although most research has found that vegetarians report higher levels of cognitive restraint compared to non-vegetarians, many studies have contributed inconsistent results. The aim of the current study, therefore, was to assess any differences between groups with varying dietary patterns on cognitive restraint and other disordered eating pattern. The second objective was to examine determinants of cognitive restraint in individuals adhering to a vegan diet, a vegetarian diet and an omnivore diet. Two-hundred and fifty-four participants with varying dietary patterns completed the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire, the Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire and the Eating Habits Questionnaire. Our results indicated that both vegetarian and vegan groups showed a significantly lower cognitive restraint, lower emotional eating and lower uncontrolled eating than those who followed an omnivorous diet. In addition, these both groups following a plant-based diet have shown more cognitions, behaviours and feelings related to an extreme focus on healthy eating (orthorexia nervosa) than group following an omnivorous diet. There were no significant differences between the groups in perseverative thinking. Core characteristics of repetitive negative thinking was a significant predictor of cognitive restraint in vegans. Feeling positively about healthy eating predicted cognitive restraint among vegetarians. Problems associated with healthy eating and feeling positively about healthy eating predicted cognitive restraint among individuals following an omnivorous diet. Knowledge of predictors of cognitive restraint may serve as a psychological intervention goal or psychoeducation goal among individuals with varying dietary patterns.
有大量研究关注不同饮食模式个体的认知约束。尽管大多数研究发现素食者报告的认知约束水平高于非素食者,但许多研究结果并不一致。因此,本研究旨在评估不同饮食模式个体在认知约束和其他饮食失调模式方面的差异。第二个目的是检验坚持素食、素食和杂食饮食个体认知约束的决定因素。254 名具有不同饮食模式的参与者完成了三因素饮食问卷、坚持思维问卷和饮食习惯问卷。我们的结果表明,素食者和纯素食者的认知约束、情绪性进食和失控性进食均显著低于杂食者。此外,这些以植物性饮食为主的群体表现出更多与极端关注健康饮食(饮食失调)相关的认知、行为和感觉,而不是杂食者群体。在坚持思维方面,各组之间没有显著差异。重复性消极思维的核心特征是纯素食者认知约束的显著预测因子。对健康饮食的积极感受预测了素食者的认知约束。与健康饮食相关的问题以及对健康饮食的积极感受预测了杂食者的认知约束。认知约束预测因子的知识可以作为不同饮食模式个体的心理干预目标或心理教育目标。