Division of Neuroimmunology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Apr;11(4):1034-1045. doi: 10.1002/acn3.52023. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
To determine the prevalence of neuroimaging abnormalities in individuals with Down syndrome regression disorder (DSRD) and evaluate if neuroimaging abnormalities were predictive of therapeutic responses.
A multicenter, retrospective, case-control study which reviewed neuroimaging studies of individuals with DSRD and compared them to a control cohort of individuals with Down syndrome (DS) alone was performed. Individuals aged 10-30 years and meeting international consensus criteria for DSRD were included. The presence of T1, T2/FLAIR, and SWI signal abnormalities was reviewed. Response rates to various therapies, including immunotherapy, were evaluated in the presence of neuroimaging abnormalities.
In total, 74 individuals (35%) had either T2/FLAIR and/or SWI signal abnormality compared to 14 individuals (12%) without DSRD (p < 0.001, 95%CI: 2.18-7.63). T2/FLAIR signal abnormalities were not appreciated more frequently in individuals with DSRD (14%, 30/210) than in the control cohort (9%, 11/119) (p = 0.18, OR: 1.63, 95%CI: 0.79-3.40). SWI signal abnormalities were appreciated at a higher frequency in individuals with DSRD (24%, 51/210) compared to the control cohort (4%, 5/119) (p < 0.001, OR: 7.31, 95%CI: 2.83-18.90). T2/FLAIR signal abnormalities were localized to the frontal (40%, 12/30) and parietal lobes (37%, 11/30). SWI signal abnormalities were predominantly in the bilateral basal ganglia (94%, 49/52). Individuals with DSRD and the presence of T2/FLAIR and/or SWI signal abnormalities were much more likely to respond to immunotherapy (p < 0.001, OR: 8.42. 95%CI: 3.78-18.76) and less likely to respond to benzodiazepines (p = 0.01, OR: 0.45, 95%CI: 0.25-0.83), antipsychotics (p < 0.001, OR: 0.28, 95%CI: 0.11-0.55), or electroconvulsive therapy (p < 0.001, OR: 0.12; 95%CI: 0.02-0.78) compared to individuals without these neuroimaging abnormalities.
This study indicates that in individuals diagnosed with DSRD, T2/FLAIR, and SWI signal abnormalities are more common than previously thought and predict response to immunotherapy.
确定唐氏综合征退行性障碍(DSRD)患者神经影像学异常的发生率,并评估神经影像学异常是否可预测治疗反应。
进行了一项多中心、回顾性、病例对照研究,对 DSRD 患者的神经影像学研究进行了回顾,并与单纯唐氏综合征(DS)患者的对照组进行了比较。纳入年龄在 10-30 岁之间,符合 DSRD 国际共识标准的患者。评估了 T1、T2/FLAIR 和 SWI 信号异常的存在。评估了存在神经影像学异常的情况下,各种治疗方法(包括免疫疗法)的反应率。
共有 74 名(35%)患者存在 T2/FLAIR 和/或 SWI 信号异常,而 14 名(12%)无 DSRD 患者存在(p<0.001,95%CI:2.18-7.63)。DSRD 患者的 T2/FLAIR 信号异常并不比对照组(14%,30/210)更常见(p=0.18,OR:1.63,95%CI:0.79-3.40)。DSRD 患者的 SWI 信号异常发生率(24%,51/210)明显高于对照组(4%,5/119)(p<0.001,OR:7.31,95%CI:2.83-18.90)。T2/FLAIR 信号异常主要位于额叶(40%,12/30)和顶叶(37%,11/30)。SWI 信号异常主要位于双侧基底节(94%,49/52)。有 DSRD 且存在 T2/FLAIR 和/或 SWI 信号异常的患者更有可能对免疫治疗有反应(p<0.001,OR:8.42,95%CI:3.78-18.76),而对苯二氮䓬类药物(p=0.01,OR:0.45,95%CI:0.25-0.83)、抗精神病药(p<0.001,OR:0.28,95%CI:0.11-0.55)或电惊厥治疗(p<0.001,OR:0.12;95%CI:0.02-0.78)的反应性较低。
本研究表明,在诊断为 DSRD 的患者中,T2/FLAIR 和 SWI 信号异常比以前认为的更为常见,并可预测免疫治疗的反应。