Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion Strategic Partnership.
Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 Feb;50(2):178-192. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001188.
We conceptually replicated the one previous study (see record 2009-13549-001) revealing that individuals who practice a motor skill under psychological pressure (anxiety training-AT) avoid performance deterioration when exposed to higher levels of pressure. We used a >3× larger sample size than the original study and attempted to shed light on mechanisms whereby AT may promote performance under pressure by measuring variables related to three theories of choking under pressure: attentional control theory (ACT), reinvestment theory, and the biopsychosocial model (BPSM) of challenge and threat. Eighty-four participants practiced 300 golf putts over 2 days with mild psychological pressure manipulations (AT group) or no pressure manipulations (control group). On the third day, all participants completed putting posttests with no pressure manipulations, mild pressure manipulations, or high-pressure manipulations. We had participants report their mental effort, movement reinvestment, and perceived challenge/threat after each posttest to investigate ACT, reinvestment theory, and the BPSM of challenge and threat, respectively. Results showed the AT group maintained their performance across posttests, whereas the control group performed worse under pressure. Additionally, results indicated that AT moderated changes in mental effort and movement reinvestment during pressure, although neither mechanism mediated the relationship between AT and performance under pressure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
我们在概念上复制了之前的一项研究(见记录 2009-13549-001),该研究表明,在心理压力下练习运动技能的个体(焦虑训练-AT)在暴露于更高水平的压力时可以避免表现恶化。我们使用了比原始研究大 3 倍以上的样本量,并试图通过测量与三种压力下窒息理论相关的变量来阐明 AT 如何在压力下促进表现的机制:注意控制理论(ACT)、再投资理论和挑战与威胁的生物心理社会模型(BPSM)。84 名参与者在两天内进行了 300 次高尔夫推杆练习,同时进行了轻度心理压力操作(AT 组)或没有压力操作(对照组)。第三天,所有参与者在没有压力操作、轻度压力操作或高压操作的情况下完成了推杆后测。我们要求参与者在每次后测后报告他们的心理努力、动作再投资和感知的挑战/威胁,以分别调查 ACT、再投资理论和挑战与威胁的 BPSM。结果表明,AT 组在各个后测中保持了他们的表现,而对照组在压力下表现更差。此外,结果表明,AT 调节了压力下心理努力和动作再投资的变化,尽管这两种机制都没有介导 AT 与压力下表现之间的关系。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。