INRAE, Université de Tours, BOA, 37380 Nouzilly, France.
INRAE, Université de Tours, BOA, 37380 Nouzilly, France.
Animal. 2024 Mar;18(3):101099. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101099. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
A key characteristic of free-range chicken farming is to enable chickens to spend time outdoors. However, each chicken may use the available areas for roaming in variable ways. To check if, and how, broilers use their outdoor range at an individual level, we need to reliably characterise range use behaviour. Traditional methods relying on visual scans require significant time investment and only provide discontinuous information. Passive RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) systems enable tracking individually tagged chickens' when they go through pop-holes; hence, they only provide partial information on the movements of individual chickens. Here, we describe a new method to measure chickens' range use and test its reliability on three ranges each containing a different breed. We used an active RFID system to localise chickens in their barn, or in one of nine zones of their range, every 30 seconds and assessed range-use behaviour in 600 chickens belonging to three breeds of slow- or medium-growing broilers used for outdoor production (all <40 g daily weight gain). From those real-time locations, we determined five measures to describe daily range use: time spent in the barn, number of outdoor accesses, number of zones visited in a day, gregariousness (an index that increases when birds spend time in zones where other birds are), and numbers of zone changes. Principal Component Analyses (PCAs) were performed on those measures, in each production system, to create two synthetic indicators of chickens' range use behaviour. The first two PCA axes represented over 90% of the variance of the five measures and were both consistent over time and correlated with independent visual scans. Contributions of the five measures to the PCAs were similar among breeds, except for the correlation between the number of outdoor accesses and the four other measures. PC1 correlated with time spent inside the barn and zone changes frequency, whilst PC2 was explained by exploration of the range. Taken together, PC1 and PC2 indicators showed that range use increased with age, outdoor temperature (in spring), and did not differ between males and females. Importantly, daily scores for both indicators were repeatable among individuals - particularly in PC1 - showing inter-individual variability on range-use. The characterisation of broiler behaviour around their range with these reliable and repeatable indicators provides novel tools to help understand individual variations of range-use in free-range farming.
散养鸡的一个重要特征是让鸡有时间在户外活动。然而,每只鸡可能会以不同的方式利用可用的活动区域。为了检查肉鸡是否以及如何在个体水平上利用其户外范围,我们需要可靠地描述其活动范围的使用行为。传统的依赖视觉扫描的方法需要大量的时间投入,并且只能提供不连续的信息。被动 RFID(射频识别)系统可以在肉鸡通过活门时对其进行个体标记,从而跟踪它们的移动情况;因此,它们只能提供关于个体肉鸡移动的部分信息。在这里,我们描述了一种新的方法来测量鸡的活动范围,并在三个包含不同品种的围栏中测试其可靠性。我们使用主动 RFID 系统每 30 秒定位鸡在鸡舍或其活动范围的九个区域之一的位置,并评估 600 只来自三种中速或中速生长肉鸡品种的肉鸡的活动范围行为,这些肉鸡用于户外生产(日增重均<40 克)。从这些实时位置,我们确定了五个描述每日活动范围的指标:在鸡舍中度过的时间、户外访问次数、一天访问的区域数量、群居性(当鸟类在其他鸟类所在的区域中度过时间时增加的指数)以及区域变化次数。在每个生产系统中,对这些指标进行主成分分析(PCA),以创建两个描述鸡活动范围行为的综合指标。前两个 PCA 轴代表了五个指标方差的 90%以上,并且在时间上是一致的,并且与独立的视觉扫描相关。在五个指标中,只有户外访问次数与其他四个指标之间的相关性不同,它们在不同品种中的贡献相似。PC1 与鸡舍内时间和区域变化频率有关,而 PC2 则与范围探索有关。总的来说,PC1 和 PC2 指标表明,随着年龄的增长、户外温度(在春季)的增加,鸡的活动范围会增加,并且在雄性和雌性之间没有差异。重要的是,这两个指标的个体每日评分具有可重复性,尤其是在 PC1 中,这表明了个体之间在活动范围使用方面的差异。使用这些可靠且可重复的指标来描述肉鸡在其活动范围周围的行为,为了解自由放养养殖中活动范围使用的个体差异提供了新的工具。