Meltzer Jed A, Sivaratnam Gayatri, Deschamps Tiffany, Zadeh Maryam, Li Catherine, Farzan Faranak, Francois-Nienaber Alex
Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Academy for Research and Education, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Departments of Psychology and Speech-language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Front Neuroimaging. 2024 Feb 5;3:1341732. doi: 10.3389/fnimg.2024.1341732. eCollection 2024.
Protocols for noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) are generally categorized as "excitatory" or "inhibitory" based on their ability to produce short-term modulation of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in peripheral muscles, when applied to motor cortex. Anodal and cathodal stimulation are widely considered excitatory and inhibitory, respectively, on this basis. However, it is poorly understood whether such polarity-dependent changes apply for neural signals generated during task performance, at rest, or in response to sensory stimulation.
To characterize such changes, we measured spontaneous and movement-related neural activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG) before and after high-definition transcranial direct-current stimulation (HD-TDCS) of the left motor cortex (M1), while participants performed simple finger movements with the left and right hands.
Anodal HD-TDCS (excitatory) decreased the movement-related cortical fields (MRCF) localized to left M1 during contralateral right finger movements while cathodal HD-TDCS (inhibitory), increased them. In contrast, oscillatory signatures of voluntary motor output were not differentially affected by the two stimulation protocols, and tended to decrease in magnitude over the course of the experiment regardless. Spontaneous resting state oscillations were not affected either.
MRCFs are thought to reflect reafferent proprioceptive input to motor cortex following movements. Thus, these results suggest that processing of incoming sensory information may be affected by TDCS in a polarity-dependent manner that is opposite that seen for MEPs-increases in cortical excitability as defined by MEPs may correspond to reduced responses to afferent input, and vice-versa.
无创脑刺激(NIBS)方案通常根据其应用于运动皮层时对外周肌肉运动诱发电位(MEP)产生短期调制的能力,分为“兴奋性”或“抑制性”。基于此,阳极刺激和阴极刺激分别被广泛认为是兴奋性和抑制性的。然而,对于这种极性依赖性变化是否适用于任务执行期间、静息状态下或对感觉刺激做出反应时产生的神经信号,人们了解甚少。
为了表征此类变化,我们在参与者用左手和右手进行简单手指运动时,通过脑磁图(MEG)测量了左侧运动皮层(M1)进行高清经颅直流电刺激(HD - TDCS)前后的自发神经活动和与运动相关的神经活动。
阳极HD - TDCS(兴奋性)在对侧右手手指运动期间,降低了定位于左侧M1的与运动相关的皮层场(MRCF),而阴极HD - TDCS(抑制性)则增加了MRCF。相比之下,两种刺激方案对自愿运动输出的振荡特征没有差异影响,并且在实验过程中其幅度都有下降趋势。自发静息状态振荡也未受影响。
MRCF被认为反映了运动后传入运动皮层的本体感觉输入。因此,这些结果表明,传入感觉信息的处理可能会受到TDCS的极性依赖性影响,其方式与MEP相反——MEP所定义的皮层兴奋性增加可能对应于对传入输入的反应减少,反之亦然。