文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Contrasting MEG effects of anodal and cathodal high-definition TDCS on sensorimotor activity during voluntary finger movements.

作者信息

Meltzer Jed A, Sivaratnam Gayatri, Deschamps Tiffany, Zadeh Maryam, Li Catherine, Farzan Faranak, Francois-Nienaber Alex

机构信息

Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Academy for Research and Education, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Departments of Psychology and Speech-language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Neuroimaging. 2024 Feb 5;3:1341732. doi: 10.3389/fnimg.2024.1341732. eCollection 2024.


DOI:10.3389/fnimg.2024.1341732
PMID:38379832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10875011/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Protocols for noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) are generally categorized as "excitatory" or "inhibitory" based on their ability to produce short-term modulation of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in peripheral muscles, when applied to motor cortex. Anodal and cathodal stimulation are widely considered excitatory and inhibitory, respectively, on this basis. However, it is poorly understood whether such polarity-dependent changes apply for neural signals generated during task performance, at rest, or in response to sensory stimulation. METHODS: To characterize such changes, we measured spontaneous and movement-related neural activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG) before and after high-definition transcranial direct-current stimulation (HD-TDCS) of the left motor cortex (M1), while participants performed simple finger movements with the left and right hands. RESULTS: Anodal HD-TDCS (excitatory) decreased the movement-related cortical fields (MRCF) localized to left M1 during contralateral right finger movements while cathodal HD-TDCS (inhibitory), increased them. In contrast, oscillatory signatures of voluntary motor output were not differentially affected by the two stimulation protocols, and tended to decrease in magnitude over the course of the experiment regardless. Spontaneous resting state oscillations were not affected either. DISCUSSION: MRCFs are thought to reflect reafferent proprioceptive input to motor cortex following movements. Thus, these results suggest that processing of incoming sensory information may be affected by TDCS in a polarity-dependent manner that is opposite that seen for MEPs-increases in cortical excitability as defined by MEPs may correspond to reduced responses to afferent input, and vice-versa.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e9/10875011/b5f9038c3d62/fnimg-03-1341732-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e9/10875011/95345fd06e71/fnimg-03-1341732-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e9/10875011/1cd810bf06a9/fnimg-03-1341732-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e9/10875011/73437540321d/fnimg-03-1341732-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e9/10875011/2240a9c8e33e/fnimg-03-1341732-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e9/10875011/dbeb15b2d8be/fnimg-03-1341732-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e9/10875011/b5f9038c3d62/fnimg-03-1341732-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e9/10875011/95345fd06e71/fnimg-03-1341732-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e9/10875011/1cd810bf06a9/fnimg-03-1341732-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e9/10875011/73437540321d/fnimg-03-1341732-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e9/10875011/2240a9c8e33e/fnimg-03-1341732-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e9/10875011/dbeb15b2d8be/fnimg-03-1341732-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e9/10875011/b5f9038c3d62/fnimg-03-1341732-g0006.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Contrasting MEG effects of anodal and cathodal high-definition TDCS on sensorimotor activity during voluntary finger movements.

Front Neuroimaging. 2024-2-5

[2]
High-definition transcranial direct-current stimulation of the right M1 further facilitates left M1 excitability during crossed facilitation.

J Neurophysiol. 2018-4-1

[3]
Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI.

Neuroimage. 2011-1-4

[4]
Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach.

Neuroimage. 2013-7-9

[5]
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability.

Exp Brain Res. 2004-6

[6]
Influence of Concurrent Finger Movements on Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)-Induced Aftereffects.

Front Behav Neurosci. 2017-9-12

[7]
Tracking the Effect of Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Cortical Excitability and Connectivity by Means of TMS-EEG.

Front Neurosci. 2018-5-15

[8]
Modulation of movement-associated cortical activation by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Eur J Neurosci. 2009-9-29

[9]
How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain?

Eur J Neurosci. 2005-7

[10]
Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans.

Neuroscience. 2010-1-18

本文引用的文献

[1]
Tolerability and blinding of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation among older adults at intensities of up to 4 mA per electrode.

Brain Stimul. 2023

[2]
Effects of anodal tDCS on electroencephalography correlates of cognitive control in mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury.

NeuroRehabilitation. 2023

[3]
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improves attentional control in chronically stressed adults.

Front Neurosci. 2023-6-15

[4]
High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Decision-Making Ability: A Study Based on EEG.

Brain Sci. 2023-4-8

[5]
High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation over right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex differentially modulates inhibitory mechanisms for speech vs. limb movement.

Psychophysiology. 2023-8

[6]
Use of the P300 event-related potential component to index transcranial direct current stimulation effects in drug users.

IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2023-1-16

[7]
The older adult brain is less modular, more integrated, and less efficient at rest: A systematic review of large-scale resting-state functional brain networks in aging.

Psychophysiology. 2023-1

[8]
Modulation of the cognitive event-related potential P3 by transcranial direct current stimulation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022-1

[9]
Sensitivity of amplitude and phase based MEG measures of interhemispheric connectivity during unilateral finger movements.

Neuroimage. 2021-11-15

[10]
Transcranial direct current stimulation of posterior temporal cortex modulates electrophysiological correlates of auditory selective spatial attention in posterior parietal cortex.

Neuropsychologia. 2019-5-27

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索