Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Division of Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Feb 21;10:e48507. doi: 10.2196/48507.
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is an important aspect of the health care education curriculum. EBP involves following the 5 EBP steps: ask, assess, appraise, apply, and audit. These 5 steps reflect the suggested core competencies covered in teaching and learning programs to support future health care professionals applying EBP. When implementing EBP teaching, assessing outcomes by documenting the student's performance and skills is relevant. This can be done using mobile devices.
The aim of this study was to assess occupational therapy students' EBP skills as reported in a mobile app.
We applied a cross-sectional design. Descriptive statistics were used to present frequencies, percentages, means, and ranges of data regarding EBP skills found in the EBPsteps app. Associations between students' ability to formulate the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome/Population, Interest, and Context (PICO/PICo) elements and identifying relevant research evidence were analyzed with the chi-square test.
Of 4 cohorts with 150 students, 119 (79.3%) students used the app and produced 240 critically appraised topics (CATs) in the app. The EBP steps "ask," "assess," and "appraise" were often correctly performed. The clinical question was formulated correctly in 53.3% (128/240) of the CATs, and students identified research evidence in 81.2% (195/240) of the CATs. Critical appraisal checklists were used in 81.2% (195/240) of the CATs, and most of these checklists were assessed as relevant for the type of research evidence identified (165/195, 84.6%). The least frequently correctly reported steps were "apply" and "audit." In 39.6% (95/240) of the CATs, it was reported that research evidence was applied. Only 61% (58/95) of these CATs described how the research was applied to clinical practice. Evaluation of practice changes was reported in 38.8% (93/240) of the CATs. However, details about practice changes were lacking in all these CATs. A positive association was found between correctly reporting the "population" and "interventions/interest" elements of the PICO/PICo and identifying research evidence (P<.001).
We assessed the students' EBP skills based on how they documented following the EBP steps in the EBPsteps app, and our results showed variations in how well the students mastered the steps. "Apply" and "audit" were the most difficult EBP steps for the students to perform, and this finding has implications and gives directions for further development of the app and educational instruction in EBP. The EBPsteps app is a new and relevant app for students to learn and practice EBP, and it can be used to assess students' EBP skills objectively.
循证实践(EBP)是医疗保健教育课程的一个重要方面。EBP 包括遵循 5 个 EBP 步骤:提出问题、评估、评估、应用和审核。这 5 个步骤反映了教学和学习计划中建议的核心能力,以支持未来的医疗保健专业人员应用 EBP。在实施 EBP 教学时,通过记录学生的表现和技能来评估结果是相关的。这可以通过使用移动设备来完成。
本研究旨在评估移动应用程序中报告的职业治疗学生的 EBP 技能。
我们采用了横断面设计。使用描述性统计来呈现关于 EBP 技能的频率、百分比、平均值和范围的数据,这些数据来自 EBPsteps 应用程序中的 EBP 步骤。使用卡方检验分析学生制定人口、干预、比较和结果/人口、兴趣和背景(PICO/PICo)元素以及识别相关研究证据的能力之间的关联。
在 4 个包含 150 名学生的队列中,有 119 名(79.3%)学生使用了该应用程序,并在该应用程序中生成了 240 个批判性评估主题(CAT)。“提出问题”、“评估”和“评估”这三个 EBP 步骤通常得到正确执行。在 240 个 CAT 中,有 53.3%(128/240)正确制定了临床问题,81.2%(195/240)的学生确定了研究证据。在 240 个 CAT 中,有 81.2%(195/240)使用了关键评估检查表,并且这些检查表中的大多数被评估为与确定的研究证据类型相关(165/195,84.6%)。报告报告的最不频繁的正确步骤是“应用”和“审核”。在 240 个 CAT 中,有 39.6%(95/240)报告应用了研究证据。在这些 CAT 中,只有 61%(58/95)描述了如何将研究应用于临床实践。在 240 个 CAT 中有 38.8%(93/240)报告了实践变化的评估。然而,所有这些 CAT 中都缺乏关于实践变化的详细信息。在正确报告 PICO/PICo 的“人群”和“干预/兴趣”元素与识别研究证据之间发现了正相关(P<.001)。
我们根据学生在 EBPsteps 应用程序中记录 EBP 步骤的方式评估了学生的 EBP 技能,我们的结果显示学生掌握这些步骤的情况存在差异。“应用”和“审核”是学生最难执行的 EBP 步骤,这一发现对应用程序和 EBP 教学的进一步发展具有意义和指导作用。EBPsteps 应用程序是学生学习和实践 EBP 的新的和相关的应用程序,它可以用于客观地评估学生的 EBP 技能。