Ibrahim Ahmed, Matta Imad, Zakaria Ahmed S, Khogeer Abdulghani, Lee Nick, Elseherbini Tawfik, Nguyen David-Dan, Corsi Nicholas J, Bouhadana David, Arezki Adel, Chakraborty Anindyo, Meskawi Malek, Elhakim Assaad, Zorn Kevin C
Division of Urology, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Division of Urology, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Jun;18(6):190-193. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8524.
Most robot-assisted surgery (RAS) systems in Canada are donor-funded, with constraints on implementation and access due to significant costs, among other factors. Herein, we evaluated the impact of the growing multispecialty use of RAS on urologic RAS access and outcomes in the past decade.
We conducted a retrospective review of all RAS performed by different surgical specialties in two high-volume academic hospitals between 2010 and 2019 (prior to the COVID pandemic). The assessed outcomes included the effect of increased robot access over the years on annual robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) volumes, surgical waiting times (SWT), and pathologically positive surgical margins (PSM). Data were collected and analyzed from the robotic system and hospital databases.
In total, six specialties (urology, gynecology, general, cardiac, thoracic, and otorhinolaryngologic surgery) were included over the study period. RAS access by specialty doubled since 2010 (from three to six). The number of active robotic surgeons tripled from seven surgeons in 2010 to 20 surgeons in 2019. Moreover, there was a significant drop in average case volume, from a peak of 40 cases in 2014 to 25 cases in 2019 (p=0.02). RARP annual case volume followed a similar pattern, reaching a maximum of 166 cases in 2014, then declining to 137 cases in 2019. The mean SWT was substantially increased from 52 days in 2014 to 73 days in 2019; however, PSM rates were not affected by the reduction in surgical volumes (p<0.05).
Over the last decade, RAS access by specialty has increased at two Canadian academic centers due to growing multispecialty use. As there was a fixed, single-robotic system at each of the hospital centers, there was a substantial reduction in the number of RAS performed per surgeon over time, as well as a gradual increase in the SWT. The current low number of available robots and unsustainable funding resources may hinder universal patient access to RAS.
加拿大的大多数机器人辅助手术(RAS)系统由捐赠资金支持,由于成本高昂等因素,在实施和使用方面存在限制。在此,我们评估了过去十年中RAS在多专科领域的使用增加对泌尿外科RAS的可及性和手术结果的影响。
我们对2010年至2019年(新冠疫情之前)两家大型学术医院不同外科专科进行的所有RAS手术进行了回顾性研究。评估的结果包括多年来机器人设备可及性增加对每年机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)手术量、手术等待时间(SWT)和病理切缘阳性(PSM)的影响。数据从机器人系统和医院数据库中收集并分析。
在研究期间,总共纳入了六个专科(泌尿外科、妇科、普通外科、心脏外科、胸外科和耳鼻咽喉科)。自2010年以来,各专科的RAS可及性增加了一倍(从三个增加到六个)。活跃的机器人外科医生数量从2010年的7名增加到2019年的20名,增加了两倍。此外,平均病例数量显著下降,从2014年的峰值40例降至2019年的25例(p = 0.02)。RARP年度病例数量遵循类似模式,2014年达到最高的166例,然后在2019年降至137例。平均SWT从2014年的52天大幅增加到2019年的73天;然而,PSM率并未受到手术量减少的影响(p < 0.05)。
在过去十年中,由于多专科使用的增加,加拿大两个学术中心各专科的RAS可及性有所提高。由于每个医院中心都有一个固定的单一机器人系统,随着时间的推移,每位外科医生进行的RAS手术数量大幅减少,同时SWT逐渐增加。目前可用机器人数量少且资金资源不可持续,可能会阻碍患者普遍获得RAS治疗。