PEDAL, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Feb 20;9(2):e013787. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013787.
The scale-up of parenting programmes to support early childhood development (ECD) is poorly understood. Little is known about how and when early interventions are most effective. Sustainability of ECD programming requires a better understanding of the mechanisms of real-world interventions. We examined the effects on caregiving practices of Primeira Infância Melhor (PIM), a state-wide home-visiting programme in Brazil.
This propensity score matched, longitudinal, quasiexperimental study uses data from the 2015 Pelotas Birth Cohort. We matched children who received PIM at any age with other cohort children on 25 key covariates. Sensitivity, guidance and responsiveness were assessed using video-recorded play tasks. Coerciveness and the parent-child relationship were assessed using the Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales. All parenting outcomes were examined at age 4 years. Separate moderation analyses were conducted for each effect modifier: family income, child age and duration of participation.
Out of 4275 children in the cohort, 797 were enrolled in PIM up to age 4 years. 3018 children (70.6%) were included in the analytic sample, of whom 587 received PIM and 2431 were potential controls. We found a positive effect of PIM on responsiveness (β=0.08, 95% CIs 0.002 to 0.16) and sensitivity (β=0.10, 95% CIs 0.02 to 0.19). No effect was found for any secondary outcomes. Moderation analyses revealed a stronger positive effect on sensitivity for low-income parents (β=0.18, 95% CIs 0.03 to 0.34).
A state-wide, home-visiting programme in Brazil improved aspects of responsive caregiving. Effects were more pronounced for low-income families, suggesting benefits of purposeful targeting.
支持儿童早期发展(ECD)的育儿计划扩大规模的情况了解甚少。对于早期干预何时以及如何最有效知之甚少。ECD 规划的可持续性需要更好地了解真实干预措施的机制。我们研究了巴西全州范围内的家访计划 Primeira Infância Melhor(PIM)对育儿实践的影响。
这项倾向评分匹配、纵向、准实验研究使用了 2015 年佩洛塔斯出生队列的数据。我们将任何年龄接受 PIM 的儿童与队列中的其他儿童在 25 个关键协变量上进行匹配。使用录像游戏任务评估敏感性、指导和响应能力。使用父母养育和家庭调整量表评估强制性和亲子关系。所有育儿结果均在 4 岁时进行评估。对于每个调节变量(家庭收入、儿童年龄和参与时间的长短)分别进行了调节分析。
在队列中的 4275 名儿童中,有 797 名儿童在 4 岁前接受了 PIM。3018 名儿童(70.6%)被纳入分析样本,其中 587 名接受了 PIM,2431 名是潜在的对照。我们发现 PIM 对响应能力(β=0.08,95%CI0.002 至 0.16)和敏感性(β=0.10,95%CI0.02 至 0.19)有积极影响。未发现任何次要结果有影响。调节分析表明,对于低收入父母,对敏感性的积极影响更强(β=0.18,95%CI0.03 至 0.34)。
巴西全州范围内的家访计划提高了回应式育儿的各个方面。对于低收入家庭,效果更为明显,这表明有针对性的计划有好处。