Suppr超能文献

养育干预措施促进生命最初三年的儿童早期发展:全球系统评价和荟萃分析。

Parenting interventions to promote early child development in the first three years of life: A global systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2021 May 10;18(5):e1003602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003602. eCollection 2021 May.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Parents are the primary caregivers of young children. Responsive parent-child relationships and parental support for learning during the earliest years of life are crucial for promoting early child development (ECD). We conducted a global systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of parenting interventions on ECD and parenting outcomes.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Global Health Library for peer-reviewed, published articles from database inception until November 15, 2020. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of parenting interventions delivered during the first 3 years of life that evaluated at least 1 ECD outcome. At least 2 reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed study quality from eligible studies. ECD outcomes included cognitive, language, motor, and socioemotional development, behavior problems, and attachment. Parenting outcomes included parenting knowledge, parenting practices, parent-child interactions, and parental depressive symptoms. We calculated intervention effect sizes as the standardized mean difference (SMD) and estimated pooled effect sizes for each outcome separately using robust variance estimation meta-analytic approaches. We used random-effects meta-regression models to assess potential effect modification by country-income level, child age, intervention content, duration, delivery, setting, and study quality. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018092458 and CRD42018092461). Of the 11,920 articles identified, we included 111 articles representing 102 unique RCTs. Pooled effect sizes indicated positive benefits of parenting interventions on child cognitive development (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.23, 0.40, P < 0.001), language development (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.37, P < 0.001), motor development (SMD = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.32, P < 0.001), socioemotional development (SMD = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.28, P < 0.001), and attachment (SMD = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.40, P < 0.001) and reductions in behavior problems (SMD = -0.13, 95% CI: -0.18 to -0.08, P < 0.001). Positive benefits were also found on parenting knowledge (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.79, P < 0.001), parenting practices (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.44, P < 0.001), and parent-child interactions (SMD = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.53, P < 0.001). However, there was no significant reduction in parental depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.07, 95% CI: -0.16 to 0.02, P = 0.08). Subgroup analyses revealed significantly greater effects on child cognitive, language, and motor development, and parenting practices in low- and middle-income countries compared to high-income countries; and significantly greater effects on child cognitive development, parenting knowledge, parenting practices, and parent-child interactions for programs that focused on responsive caregiving compared to those that did not. On the other hand, there was no clear evidence of effect modification by child age, intervention duration, delivery, setting, or study risk of bias. Study limitations include considerable unexplained heterogeneity, inadequate reporting of intervention content and implementation, and varying quality of evidence in terms of the conduct of trials and robustness of outcome measures used across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Parenting interventions for children during the first 3 years of life are effective for improving ECD outcomes and enhancing parenting outcomes across low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Increasing implementation of effective and high-quality parenting interventions is needed globally and at scale in order to support parents and enable young children to achieve their full developmental potential.

摘要

背景

父母是幼儿的主要照顾者。在生命的最初几年中,建立响应式的亲子关系和支持学习的育儿方式对于促进幼儿发展(ECD)至关重要。我们进行了全球系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估育儿干预对 ECD 和育儿结果的有效性。

方法和发现

我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Web of Science 和全球卫生图书馆,以获取从数据库成立到 2020 年 11 月 15 日发表的同行评审的已发表文章。我们纳入了在生命的头 3 年期间进行的育儿干预的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验评估了至少 1 个 ECD 结果。至少有 2 位审阅者独立筛选、提取数据并从合格研究中评估研究质量。ECD 结果包括认知、语言、运动和社会情感发展、行为问题和依恋。育儿结果包括育儿知识、育儿实践、亲子互动和父母的抑郁症状。我们将干预效果大小计算为标准化均数差(SMD),并使用稳健方差估计荟萃分析方法分别为每个结果估计汇总效果大小。我们使用随机效应荟萃回归模型来评估国家收入水平、儿童年龄、干预内容、持续时间、提供方式、设置和研究质量的潜在效果修饰作用。本综述已在 PROSPERO(CRD42018092458 和 CRD42018092461)中注册。在 11,920 篇文章中,我们纳入了 111 篇文章,代表了 102 项独特的 RCT。汇总效果大小表明,育儿干预对儿童认知发展(SMD = 0.32,95%CI [置信区间]:0.23,0.40,P < 0.001)、语言发展(SMD = 0.28,95%CI:0.18 至 0.37,P < 0.001)、运动发展(SMD = 0.24,95%CI:0.15 至 0.32,P < 0.001)、社会情感发展(SMD = 0.19,95%CI:0.10 至 0.28,P < 0.001)和依恋(SMD = 0.29,95%CI:0.18 至 0.40,P < 0.001)有积极的益处,并且减少了行为问题(SMD = -0.13,95%CI:-0.18 至 -0.08,P < 0.001)。在育儿知识(SMD = 0.56,95%CI:0.33 至 0.79,P < 0.001)、育儿实践(SMD = 0.33,95%CI:0.22 至 0.44,P < 0.001)和亲子互动(SMD = 0.39,95%CI:0.24 至 0.53,P < 0.001)方面也发现了积极的益处。然而,父母的抑郁症状并没有明显减少(SMD = -0.07,95%CI:-0.16 至 0.02,P = 0.08)。亚组分析表明,在低收入和中等收入国家,与高收入国家相比,对儿童认知、语言和运动发展以及育儿实践的影响更为显著;在以响应式照护为重点的计划中,对儿童认知发展、育儿知识、育儿实践和亲子互动的影响更为显著,而不是没有。另一方面,儿童年龄、干预持续时间、提供方式、设置或研究偏倚风险对效果没有明显的修饰作用。研究局限性包括大量未解释的异质性、干预内容和实施的报告不足,以及在研究中使用的试验进行和结果衡量的稳健性方面存在不同的证据质量。

结论

在生命的头 3 年期间对儿童进行的育儿干预措施对于改善 ECD 结果和提高低、中、高收入国家的育儿结果是有效的。需要在全球范围内增加实施有效和高质量的育儿干预措施的力度和规模,以支持父母并使幼儿能够充分发挥其发展潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fea/8109838/6ff78b0db8b2/pmed.1003602.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验