Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Marechal Deodoro - 1160, Pelotas, RS 96020220, Brazil.
Human Development and Violence Research Centre (DOVE), Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Marechal Deodoro - 1160, Pelotas, RS 96020220, Brazil.
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Apr 10;39(4):344-354. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae015.
Partnership between early childhood development interventions and primary health care services can help catalyse health care uptake by socially vulnerable families. This study aimed to assess the real-life effects of a large-scale home visiting programme [Primeira Infância Melhor (PIM)] in Brazil on the use of preventive (prenatal visits, well child visits, dentist visits and vaccination) and recovery (emergency room visits and hospitalization) health services. A quasi-experiment nested in a population-based birth cohort study was conducted. The intervention group was firstly defined as all children enrolled in PIM up to age 6 months, and afterwards stratified between those enrolled during pregnancy or after birth up to 6 months. Children receiving PIM were matched with controls on propensity scores based on 27 confounders to estimate effects on health service use from prenatal to age 2 years. Double adjustment was applied in outcome Quasi-Poisson regressions. No evidence was found for effects of PIM starting anytime up to 6 months (262 pairs), or for the children enrolled only after birth (133 pairs), on outcomes occurring after age 6 months. When the programme started during pregnancy (129 pairs), there was a 13% higher prevalence of adequate prenatal visits (prevalence ratio = 1.13; 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.27), but no effect on use of any other health service. Sensitivity analyses suggested longer participation in the programme with reduced visitor turnover might improve its impact on prenatal visits. Integration between PIM and primary health care was not adequate to affect overall patterns of contacts with health services. Nevertheless, prenatal home visits showed potential to increase health service contact during a sensitive period of development, indicating the need to start such programmes before birth, when there is more time for maternal care, and family engagement in a network of services is facilitated.
儿童发展早期干预与初级卫生保健服务之间的伙伴关系有助于促进社会弱势群体家庭获得医疗保健。本研究旨在评估巴西一项大规模家访计划[Primeira Infância Melhor (PIM)]对预防(产前检查、儿童健康检查、看牙医和接种疫苗)和恢复(急诊室就诊和住院)保健服务利用的实际效果。该研究采用准实验设计,嵌套在一项基于人群的出生队列研究中。干预组最初定义为所有在 6 个月龄前入组 PIM 的儿童,随后根据入组时间(孕期或 6 个月龄内)分为两组。基于 27 个混杂因素,采用倾向评分匹配儿童接受 PIM 与对照组,以估计从产前到 2 岁时健康服务使用的效果。采用双重调整方法在结局准泊松回归中进行分析。研究未发现 PIM 从孕期开始至 6 个月龄内任何时间(262 对)或仅在出生后入组(133 对)对 6 个月龄后发生的结局有影响。当该计划在孕期开始时(129 对),产前检查次数充足的比例增加了 13%(优势比=1.13;95%置信区间为 1.01-1.27),但对其他任何卫生服务的使用均无影响。敏感性分析表明,参与者更长时间地参与、访客更换率更低,可能会提高其对产前检查的影响。PIM 与初级卫生保健的整合不足,无法改变整体健康服务接触模式。尽管如此,产前家访可能会增加发展敏感时期的卫生服务接触,这表明有必要在出生前启动此类计划,因为此时有更多的时间进行母婴护理,并且家庭更容易参与服务网络。