Suppr超能文献

腕管松解术后支具固定是否有益?系统评价和荟萃分析。

Are there any benefits for post-operative splinting after carpal tunnel release? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers University New-Brunswick, Moncton, NJ, USA.

Clinical Research Development Center, Taleghani and Imam Ali Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 21;25(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07230-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a controversy on the effectiveness of post-operating splinting in patients with carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery. This study aimed to systematically evaluate various outcomes regarding the effectiveness of post-operating splinting in CTR surgery.

METHODS

Multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane, were searched for terms related to carpal tunnel syndrome. A total of eight studies involving 596 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The quality of studies was evaluated, and their risk of bias was calculated using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) and Cochrane's collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials. Data including the visual analogue scale (VAS), pinch strength, grip strength, two-point discrimination, symptom severity score (SSS), and functional status scale (FSS) were extracted.

RESULTS

Our analysis showed no significant differences between the splinted and non-splinted groups based on the VAS, SSS, FSS, grip strength, pinch strength, and two-point discrimination. The calculated values of the standardized mean difference (SMD) or the weighted mean difference (WMD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI) for different variables were as follows: VAS [SMD = 0.004, 95% CI (-0.214, 0.222)], pinch strength [WMD = 1.061, 95% CI (-0.559, 2.681)], grip strength [SMD = 0.178, 95% CI (-0.014, 0.369)], SSS [WMD = 0.026, 95% CI (- 0.191, 0.242)], FSS [SMD = 0.089, 95% CI (-0.092, 0.269)], and the two-point discrimination [SMD = 0.557, 95% CI (-0.140, 1.253)].

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings revealed no statistically significant differences between the splinted and non-splinted groups in terms of the VAS, SSS, FSS, grip strength, pinch strength, and two-point discrimination. These results indicate that there is no substantial evidence supporting a significant advantage of post-operative splinting after CTR.

摘要

背景

在腕管松解术后患者中,术后夹板固定的有效性存在争议。本研究旨在系统评估腕管松解术后夹板固定的各种疗效。

方法

通过检索 PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 等多个数据库,查找与腕管综合征相关的术语。对纳入的八项研究(共 596 例患者)进行质量评估,并使用非随机研究方法学指数(MINORS)和 Cochrane 协作工具评估随机对照试验的偏倚风险。提取视觉模拟评分(VAS)、捏力、握力、两点辨别觉、症状严重程度评分(SSS)和功能状态评分(FSS)等数据。

结果

根据 VAS、SSS、FSS、握力、捏力和两点辨别觉,夹板固定组与非夹板固定组之间无显著差异。不同变量的标准化均数差(SMD)或加权均数差(WMD)和 95%置信区间(CI)的计算值如下:VAS [SMD = 0.004,95%CI(-0.214,0.222)]、捏力 [WMD = 1.061,95%CI(-0.559,2.681)]、握力 [SMD = 0.178,95%CI(-0.014,0.369)]、SSS [WMD = 0.026,95%CI(-0.191,0.242)]、FSS [SMD = 0.089,95%CI(-0.092,0.269)]和两点辨别觉 [SMD = 0.557,95%CI(-0.140,1.253)]。

结论

在 VAS、SSS、FSS、握力、捏力和两点辨别觉方面,夹板固定组与非夹板固定组之间无统计学差异。这些结果表明,没有确凿证据支持腕管松解术后使用术后夹板固定有显著优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9242/10880356/659018aa2b8e/12891_2024_7230_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Are there any benefits for post-operative splinting after carpal tunnel release? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 21;25(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07230-6.
2
Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 31;2014(1):CD008265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008265.pub2.
3
Splinting for carpal tunnel syndrome.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 27;2(2):CD010003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010003.pub2.
5
Non-surgical treatment (other than steroid injection) for carpal tunnel syndrome.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD003219. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003219.
6
Acupuncture and related interventions for the treatment of symptoms associated with carpal tunnel syndrome.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 2;12(12):CD011215. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011215.pub2.
7
A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Splinting After Minicarpal Tunnel Release.
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Aug;43(8):775.e1-775.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
9
Splinting after Carpal Tunnel Release: Does it really Matter?
Malays Orthop J. 2015 Jul;9(2):41-46. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1507.011.
10
Early mobilization following carpal tunnel release. A prospective randomized study.
J Hand Surg Br. 1995 Apr;20(2):228-30. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681(05)80057-9.

本文引用的文献

1
A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Splinting After Minicarpal Tunnel Release.
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Aug;43(8):775.e1-775.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
2
Splinting after Carpal Tunnel Release: Does it really Matter?
Malays Orthop J. 2015 Jul;9(2):41-46. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1507.011.
3
Duration of postoperative dressing after mini-open carpal tunnel release: a prospective, randomized trial.
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Jan;37(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.10.011. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
4
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
5
Measurement of grip strength: validity and reliability of the sphygmomanometer and jamar grip dynamometer.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1992;16(5):215-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1992.16.5.215.
6
Use of a splint following open carpal tunnel release: a comparative study.
Adv Ther. 2007 May-Jun;24(3):478-84. doi: 10.1007/BF02848769.
8
Wrist immobilization after carpal tunnel release: a prospective study.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2006 Sep;64(3A):596-9. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2006000400013.
10
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验