• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of cesarean delivery rates and factors associated with cesarean delivery among women enrolled in a pregnancy cohort study at two tertiary hospitals in Thailand.评估在泰国两家三级医院参加妊娠队列研究的女性中剖宫产率和与剖宫产相关的因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Feb 21;24(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06314-4.
2
Cesarean delivery in the United States 2005 through 2014: a population-based analysis using the Robson 10-Group Classification System.2005 年至 2014 年美国的剖宫产术:使用 Robson 10 组分类系统的基于人群的分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;219(1):105.e1-105.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
3
Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.足月选择性引产的母婴结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):273.e1-273.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.223. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
4
A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section.迈向更好的审计:除剖宫产外的其他结局的 Robson Ten 分组分类系统。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jul;101(7):827-835. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14350. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
5
Crude and adjusted comparisons of cesarean delivery rates using the Robson classification: A population-based cohort study in Canada and Sweden, 2004 to 2016.采用 Robson 分类法对剖宫产率进行的粗比较和调整后比较:2004 年至 2016 年加拿大和瑞典的基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Aug 1;19(8):e1004077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004077. eCollection 2022 Aug.
6
Is gestational age at term a risk factor for ongoing pregnancies in nulliparous women: A prospective cohort study.足月时的胎龄是否是初产妇持续妊娠的危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Feb;5(2):100808. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100808. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
7
The Robson ten-group classification system for appraising deliveries at a tertiary referral hospital in Brazil.巴西一家三级转诊医院用于评估分娩情况的罗布森十组分类系统。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;129(3):236-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.026. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
8
Evaluation of cesarean delivery rates at three university hospital labor units using the Robson classification system.应用罗伯逊分类系统评价 3 所大学附属医院产房的剖宫产率。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Jul;146(1):118-125. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12842. Epub 2019 May 21.
9
Applying the Robson classification to routine facility data to understand the Caesarean section practice in conflict settings of South Kivu, eastern DR Congo.运用 Robson 分类法对常规设施数据进行分析,以了解刚果民主共和国东部南基伍省冲突地区的剖宫产实践情况。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 8;15(9):e0237450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237450. eCollection 2020.
10
Robson classification of caesarean births: implications for reducing caesarean section rate in a private tertiary hospital in Nigeria.剖宫产的罗布森分类:对尼日利亚一家私立三级医院降低剖宫产率的影响
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 12;23(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05557-x.

本文引用的文献

1
"Because it eases my Childbirth Plan": a qualitative study on factors contributing to preferences for caesarean section in Thailand.“因为它让我的分娩计划变得轻松”:一项关于泰国剖宫产偏好因素的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 24;23(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05576-8.
2
Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates.剖宫产率的趋势和预测:全球和区域估计。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jun;6(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671.
3
Why do pregnant women prefer cesarean birth? A qualitative study in a tertiary care center in Southern Thailand.为什么孕妇更喜欢剖宫产?泰国南部一家三级护理中心的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03525-3.
4
Incidence of influenza during pregnancy and association with pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in three middle-income countries: a multisite prospective longitudinal cohort study.妊娠期间流感的发病率及其与妊娠和围产期结局的关系:三个中等收入国家的多地点前瞻性纵向队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;21(1):97-106. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30592-2. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
5
What are women's mode of birth preferences and why? A systematic scoping review.女性的分娩方式偏好及其原因是什么?系统范围综述。
Women Birth. 2020 Jul;33(4):323-333. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
6
Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children.剖宫产术对母婴健康的短期和长期影响。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349-1357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5.
7
The Pregnancy and Influenza Multinational Epidemiologic (PRIME) study: a prospective cohort study of the impact of influenza during pregnancy among women in middle-income countries.妊娠和流感多国流行病学(PRIME)研究:一项前瞻性队列研究,旨在探讨中低收入国家孕妇流感感染的影响。
Reprod Health. 2018 Sep 21;15(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0600-x.
8
Factors Associated with Successful Trial of Labor after Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Cohort Study.剖宫产术后成功试产的相关因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Pregnancy. 2018 Jun 3;2018:6140982. doi: 10.1155/2018/6140982. eCollection 2018.
9
Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis.剖宫产术对母婴及后续妊娠的长期风险和获益:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jan 23;15(1):e1002494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002494. eCollection 2018 Jan.
10
Cesarean rates and severe maternal and neonatal outcomes according to the Robson 10-Group Classification System in Khon Kaen Province, Thailand.泰国孔敬府根据罗伯逊 10 分组分类系统的剖宫产率和严重母婴结局。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Feb;140(2):191-197. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12372. Epub 2017 Nov 24.

评估在泰国两家三级医院参加妊娠队列研究的女性中剖宫产率和与剖宫产相关的因素。

Evaluation of cesarean delivery rates and factors associated with cesarean delivery among women enrolled in a pregnancy cohort study at two tertiary hospitals in Thailand.

机构信息

Nopparat Rajathanee Hospital, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.

Influenza Program, Thailand Ministry of Public Health - U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Ministry of Public Health (DDC building 7), Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Feb 21;24(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06314-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06314-4
PMID:38383397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10880209/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cesarean delivery rates have increased globally resulting in a public health concern. We estimate rates of cesarean deliveries among Thai women using the World Health Organization (WHO) Robson Classification system and compare rates by Robson group to the Robson guideline for acceptable rates to identify groups that might benefit most from interventions for rate reduction.

METHODS

In 2017 and 2018, we established cohorts of pregnant women aged ≥ 18 years seeking prenatal care at two tertiary Thai hospitals and followed them until 6-8 weeks postpartum. Three in-person interviews (enrollment, end of pregnancy, and postpartum) were conducted using structured questionnaires to obtain demographic characteristics, health history, and delivery information. Cesarean delivery indication was classified based on core obstetric variables (parity, previous cesarean delivery, number of fetuses, fetal presentation, gestational week, and onset of labor) assigned to 10 groups according to the Robson Classification. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with cesarean delivery among nulliparous women with singleton, cephalic, term pregnancies.

RESULTS

Of 2,137 participants, 970 (45%) had cesarean deliveries. The median maternal age at delivery was 29 years (interquartile range, 25-35); 271 (13%) participants had existing medical conditions; and 446 (21%) had pregnancy complications. The cesarean delivery rate varied by Robson group. Multiparous women with > 1 previous uterine scar, with a single cephalic pregnancy, ≥ 37 weeks gestation (group 5) contributed the most (14%) to the overall cesarean rate, whereas those with a single pregnancy with a transverse or oblique lie, including women with previous uterine scars (group 9) contributed the least (< 1%). Factors independently associated with cesarean delivery included age ≥ 25 years, pre-pregnancy obesity, new/worsen medical condition during pregnancy, fetal distress, abnormal labor, infant size for gestational age ≥ 50 percentiles, and self-pay for delivery fees. Women with existing blood conditions were less likely to have cesarean delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost one in two pregnancies among women in our cohorts resulted in cesarean deliveries. Compared to WHO guidelines, cesarean delivery rates were elevated in selected Robson groups indicating that tailored interventions to minimize non-clinically indicated cesarean delivery for specific groups of pregnancies may be warranted.

摘要

背景

剖宫产率在全球范围内呈上升趋势,这是一个公共卫生问题。我们使用世界卫生组织(WHO)罗伯逊分类系统估计泰国妇女的剖宫产率,并按罗伯逊组与可接受率的罗伯逊指南进行比较,以确定最有可能从降低剖宫产率干预措施中受益的人群。

方法

2017 年和 2018 年,我们在两家泰国三级医院建立了年龄≥18 岁的孕妇队列,并在产后 6-8 周对其进行随访。通过结构化问卷进行了三次面对面访谈(入组、妊娠结束和产后),以获取人口统计学特征、健康史和分娩信息。剖宫产术指征根据核心产科变量(产次、既往剖宫产术、胎儿数、胎儿位置、孕周和临产开始)进行分类,根据罗伯逊分类系统将这些变量分为 10 组。使用逻辑回归分析确定初产妇中与剖宫产术相关的因素,这些初产妇为单胎、头位、足月妊娠。

结果

在 2137 名参与者中,有 970 名(45%)行剖宫产术。产妇分娩时的中位年龄为 29 岁(四分位间距 25-35 岁);271 名(13%)参与者有现有医疗条件;446 名(21%)有妊娠并发症。罗伯逊组的剖宫产率有所不同。有>1 次子宫瘢痕的多产妇,单胎头位,≥37 孕周(第 5 组)对总剖宫产率的贡献最大(14%),而单胎横位或斜位,包括有既往子宫瘢痕的产妇(第 9 组)的贡献最小(<1%)。与剖宫产术独立相关的因素包括年龄≥25 岁、孕前肥胖、妊娠期间新出现/恶化的医疗状况、胎儿窘迫、异常产程、胎儿大小与胎龄≥50%相比、以及自行支付分娩费用。有现有血液状况的妇女发生剖宫产的可能性较小。

结论

我们队列中近一半的孕妇分娩需要剖宫产。与世界卫生组织的指南相比,选定的罗伯逊组的剖宫产率升高,这表明可能需要针对特定妊娠人群量身定制干预措施,以尽量减少非临床指征的剖宫产术。