• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高酒精税对政府税收的影响:来自五个欧洲国家的见解。

The Impact of Raising Alcohol Taxes on Government Tax Revenue: Insights from Five European Countries.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research (ZIS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 May;22(3):363-374. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00873-5. Epub 2024 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1007/s40258-024-00873-5
PMID:38386271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11021250/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Reducing the affordability of alcoholic beverages by increasing alcohol excise taxation can lead to a reduction in alcohol consumption but the impact on government alcohol excise tax revenue is poorly understood. This study aimed to (a) describe cross-country tax revenue variations and (b) investigate how changes in taxation were related to changes in government tax revenue, using data from Estonia, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland.

METHODS

For the population aged 15 years or older, we calculated the annual per capita alcohol excise tax revenue, total tax revenue, gross domestic product and alcohol consumption. In addition to descriptive analyses, joinpoint regressions were performed to identify whether changes in alcohol excise taxation were linked to changes in alcohol excise revenue since 1999.

RESULTS

In 2022, the per capita alcohol excise tax revenue was lowest in Germany (€44.2) and highest in Estonia (€218.4). In all countries, the alcohol excise tax revenue was mostly determined by spirit sales (57-72% of total alcohol tax revenue). During 2010-20, inflation-adjusted per capita alcohol excise tax revenues have declined in Germany (- 22.9%), Poland (- 19.1%) and Estonia (- 4.2%) and increased in Latvia (+ 56.8%) and Lithuania (+ 49.3%). In periods of policy non-action, alcohol consumption and tax revenue showed similar trends, but tax level increases were accompanied by increased revenue and stagnant or decreased consumption.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing alcohol taxation was not linked to decreased but increased government revenue. Policymakers can increase revenue and reduce alcohol consumption and harm by increasing alcohol taxes.

摘要

背景与目的

通过提高酒精消费税来降低酒精饮料的可负担性,可导致酒精消费减少,但政府酒精消费税收入的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在:(a) 描述各国之间的税收收入差异;(b) 利用爱沙尼亚、德国、拉脱维亚、立陶宛和波兰的数据,调查税收变化与政府税收收入变化之间的关系。

方法

我们为年龄在 15 岁或以上的人群计算了每年人均酒精消费税收入、总税收收入、国内生产总值和酒精消费。除了描述性分析外,我们还进行了 joinpoint 回归,以确定自 1999 年以来,酒精消费税的变化是否与酒精消费税收入的变化有关。

结果

2022 年,人均酒精消费税收入最低的是德国(44.2 欧元),最高的是爱沙尼亚(218.4 欧元)。在所有国家,酒精消费税收入主要由烈酒销售决定(占总酒精税收入的 57-72%)。在 2010-20 年期间,经通胀调整后的人均酒精消费税收入在德国(-22.9%)、波兰(-19.1%)和爱沙尼亚(-4.2%)下降,在拉脱维亚(+56.8%)和立陶宛(+49.3%)增加。在政策未发生变化的时期,酒精消费和税收呈现出相似的趋势,但税收水平的提高伴随着收入的增加和消费的停滞或减少。

结论

提高酒精税并没有导致政府收入减少,反而增加了收入。提高酒精税可以增加收入、减少酒精消费和危害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d386/11021250/b8ff2842339d/40258_2024_873_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d386/11021250/66a107d54644/40258_2024_873_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d386/11021250/2f6f27ee19e3/40258_2024_873_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d386/11021250/74ff82103870/40258_2024_873_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d386/11021250/4afd717ad381/40258_2024_873_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d386/11021250/9f0493b49b78/40258_2024_873_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d386/11021250/f5c8eb2e52d9/40258_2024_873_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d386/11021250/b8ff2842339d/40258_2024_873_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d386/11021250/66a107d54644/40258_2024_873_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d386/11021250/2f6f27ee19e3/40258_2024_873_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d386/11021250/74ff82103870/40258_2024_873_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d386/11021250/4afd717ad381/40258_2024_873_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d386/11021250/9f0493b49b78/40258_2024_873_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d386/11021250/f5c8eb2e52d9/40258_2024_873_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d386/11021250/b8ff2842339d/40258_2024_873_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of Raising Alcohol Taxes on Government Tax Revenue: Insights from Five European Countries.提高酒精税对政府税收的影响:来自五个欧洲国家的见解。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 May;22(3):363-374. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00873-5. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
2
How many alcohol-attributable deaths and hospital admissions could be prevented by alternative pricing and taxation policies? Modelling impacts on alcohol consumption, revenues and related harms in Canada.通过替代性定价和税收政策可以预防多少与酒精相关的死亡和住院?模拟对加拿大酒精消费、收入和相关危害的影响。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2020 Jun;40(5-6):153-164. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.40.5/6.04.
3
Comparing taxes on alcoholic beverages in the Region of the Americas.比较美洲区域的酒类饮料税收。
Addiction. 2023 Jul;118(7):1389-1395. doi: 10.1111/add.16146. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
4
Effects of changes to the taxation of beer on alcohol consumption and government revenue in Australia.澳大利亚啤酒税收政策变化对酒精消费和政府收入的影响。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Aug;70:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 May 1.
5
Estimated impacts of alternative Australian alcohol taxation structures on consumption, public health and government revenues.澳大利亚不同酒类税收结构对酒类消费、公共健康和政府税收的影响评估。
Med J Aust. 2013 Nov 4;199(9):619-22. doi: 10.5694/mja13.10605.
6
Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市对含糖饮料征税一年后价格、销量、消费者支出及饮料消费的变化:一项前后对照研究
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr.
7
Smoking prevention that increases tax revenue: tobacco taxes in the Czech Republic 2004-2020.增加税收的控烟措施:2004-2020 年捷克共和国的烟草税。
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2023 Jun;31(2):83-89. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a7507.
8
Who pays the most cigarette tax in Turkey.在土耳其谁缴纳的香烟税最多。
Tob Control. 2016 Jan;25(1):39-45. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051639. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
9
Better cigarette tax policies and higher tobacco excise tax revenues.更好的香烟税收政策和更高的烟草消费税收入。
Tob Control. 2024 Oct 19;33(6):727-732. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057808.
10
The efficiency of a volumetric alcohol tax in Australia.澳大利亚容积酒精税的效率。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2012 Jan 1;10(1):37-49. doi: 10.2165/11594850-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in economic indicators, alcohol use, and alcohol-attributable health indicators in India.印度经济指标、酒精使用及酒精所致健康指标的趋势
Alcohol Alcohol. 2025 May 14;60(4). doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agaf024.
2
A return on investment analysis for the 2017 increase in alcohol excise taxation in Lithuania.立陶宛2017年提高酒精消费税的投资回报率分析。
Addiction. 2025 Oct;120(10):2094-2104. doi: 10.1111/add.70083. Epub 2025 May 6.
3
Tax and noncommunicable diseases attributable to tobacco and alcohol consumption in 5 Sub-Saharan African countries.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the WHO "best buys" for alcohol policy on consumption and health in the Baltic countries and Poland 2000-2020.2000 - 2020年世界卫生组织酒精政策“最佳采购建议”对波罗的海国家和波兰酒精消费及健康的影响
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Aug 31;33:100704. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100704. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
A narrative review of alcohol control policies in Latvia between 1990 and 2020.1990 年至 2020 年期间拉脱维亚的酒精控制政策述评。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023 May;42(4):946-959. doi: 10.1111/dar.13647. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
3
Classifying alcohol control policies enacted between 2000 and 2020 in Poland and the Baltic countries to model potential impact.
撒哈拉以南非洲5国因烟草和酒精消费导致的税收与非传染性疾病
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 10;12:1464897. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1464897. eCollection 2024.
对波兰和波罗的海国家在 2000 年至 2020 年间颁布的酒精控制政策进行分类,以模拟潜在影响。
Addiction. 2023 Mar;118(3):449-458. doi: 10.1111/add.16102. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
4
Affordability of Alcoholic Beverages in the European Union.欧盟酒精饮料的可承受性
Eur Addict Res. 2023;29(1):63-66. doi: 10.1159/000527096. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
5
Prices, taxes and alcohol use: a systematic umbrella review.价格、税收与酒精使用:系统综述。
Addiction. 2022 Dec;117(12):3004-3023. doi: 10.1111/add.15966. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
6
Impact of introducing a minimum alcohol tax share in retail prices on alcohol-attributable mortality in the WHO European Region: A modelling study.引入零售价格中最低酒精税份额对世界卫生组织欧洲区域酒精所致死亡率的影响:一项建模研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Feb 23;15:100325. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100325. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
The impact of alcohol taxation changes on unrecorded alcohol consumption: A review and recommendations.酒精税收变化对未记录酒精消费的影响:综述与建议。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Jan;99:103420. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103420. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
8
Effects of minimum unit pricing for alcohol in South Africa across different drinker groups and wealth quintiles: a modelling study.南非针对不同饮酒群体和财富五分位数实施的酒精最低单位定价的效果:一项建模研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 9;11(8):e052879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052879.
9
Alcohol-Related Deaths in Poland During a Period of Weakening Alcohol Control Measures.波兰在酒精控制措施减弱期间与酒精相关的死亡人数。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 16;325(11):1108-1109. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.25879.
10
Shifts in drug seizures in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.美国在新冠疫情期间毒品缉获量的变化。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Apr 1;221:108580. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108580. Epub 2021 Mar 2.