Rehm Jürgen, Hassan Ahmed S, Franklin Ari, Patra Jayadeep, Wettlaufer Ashley, Jiang Huan, Shield Kevin D
Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 250 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1R8, Canada.
Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 250 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1R8, Canada.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2025 May 14;60(4). doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agaf024.
Economic development leading a country from a low- to middle-income status is usually associated with increases in alcohol consumption and decreases in all-cause mortality, despite increases in alcohol-attributable mortality. We analyzed this tradition for India during the years 2000-19, with attention to alcohol policy.
Joinpoint analysis identified points of trend change and associated slopes for alcohol-attributable mortality and burden (disability-adjusted life years) between 2000 and 2019. Structural equation modeling assessed the relationship among adult alcohol per capita consumption, gross domestic product per capita at purchasing power parity (GDP-PPP per capita), alcohol-attributable mortality, and all-cause mortality, where mortality rates were log-transformed in the models. Pearson correlation was evaluated among study variables. Literature review examined alcohol policies in India.
During the first decade between 2000 and 2019, a rapidly and steadily increasing GDP-PPP per capita was associated with marked increases in alcohol consumption and decreases in all-cause mortality, despite increasing alcohol-attributable mortality. After 2010, the economic growth still increased, but the increase in alcohol consumption halted, likely due to strong alcohol control policies in availability restrictions (dry states, dry periods, high legal purchasing age and restrictions in density, and purchasing hours), as well as a high tax share on final price.
Alcohol policies seem to have prevented further increases in alcohol consumption and attributable harm and thus should be upheld. Otherwise, increases in these harms will prevent India from fully reaping the health benefits of economic development.
一个国家从低收入状态向中等收入状态的经济发展通常伴随着酒精消费量的增加和全因死亡率的下降,尽管酒精归因死亡率有所上升。我们分析了印度在2000年至2019年期间的这一传统情况,并关注酒精政策。
Joinpoint分析确定了2000年至2019年期间酒精归因死亡率和负担(伤残调整生命年)的趋势变化点及相关斜率。结构方程模型评估了成人人均酒精消费量、购买力平价人均国内生产总值(人均GDP-PPP)、酒精归因死亡率和全因死亡率之间的关系,模型中死亡率采用对数转换。对研究变量进行Pearson相关性评估。文献综述考察了印度的酒精政策。
在2000年至2019年的第一个十年间,尽管酒精归因死亡率上升,但人均GDP-PPP的快速稳步增长与酒精消费量的显著增加和全因死亡率的下降相关。2010年后,经济仍在增长,但酒精消费量的增长停止了,这可能是由于在供应限制方面实施了强有力的酒精控制政策(禁酒邦、禁酒期、较高的法定购买年龄以及在密度和购买时间方面的限制),以及最终价格中较高的税收份额。
酒精政策似乎阻止了酒精消费及相关危害的进一步增加,因此应予以维持。否则,这些危害的增加将阻碍印度充分收获经济发展带来的健康益处。