• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于多参数 MRI 的深度学习模型在 PI-RADS 评分基础上对前列腺癌的检测和临床显著疾病的分类

Deep learning model for the detection of prostate cancer and classification of clinically significant disease using multiparametric MRI in comparison to PI-RADs score.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2024 May;42(5):158.e17-158.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.021. Epub 2024 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.021
PMID:38388243
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) is an established reporting scheme for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to distinguish clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Deep learning (DL) holds great potential for automating csPCa classification on mpMRI.

METHOD

To compare the performance between a DL algorithm and PI-RADS categorization in PCa detection and csPCa classification, we included 1,729 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy or biopsy in Tongji hospital. We developed DL models by integrating individual mpMRI sequences and employing an ensemble approach for distinguishing between csPCa and CiSPCa (specifically defined as PCa with a Gleason group 1 or benign prostate disease, training cohort: 1,285 patients vs. external testing cohort: 315 patients).

RESULTS

DL-based models exhibited higher csPCa detection rates than PI-RADS categorization (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.902; sensitivity: 0.728; specificity: 0.906 vs. AUC: 0.759; sensitivity: 0.761; specificity: 0.756) (P < 0.001) Notably, DL networks exhibited significant strength in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) arm < 10 ng/ml compared with PI-RADS assessment (AUC: 0.788; sensitivity: 0.588; specificity: 0.883 vs. AUC: 0.618; sensitivity: 0.379; specificity: 0.763) (P = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed DL-based mpMRI ensemble models for csPCa classification with improved sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy compared with clinical PI-RADS assessment. In the PSA-stratified condition, the DL ensemble model performed better than PI-RADS in the detection of csPCa in both the high PSA group and the low PSA group.

摘要

背景

前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)是一种用于区分临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)的多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)报告方案。深度学习(DL)在 mpMRI 上自动化 csPCa 分类方面具有巨大潜力。

方法

为了比较 DL 算法和 PI-RADS 分类在前列腺癌检测和 csPCa 分类中的性能,我们纳入了在同济医院接受根治性前列腺切除术或活检的 1729 例连续患者。我们通过整合个体 mpMRI 序列并采用集成方法来区分 csPCa 和 CiSPCa(具体定义为 Gleason 组 1 或良性前列腺疾病的前列腺癌,训练队列:1285 例患者与外部测试队列:315 例患者)来开发 DL 模型。

结果

基于 DL 的模型比 PI-RADS 分类具有更高的 csPCa 检测率(曲线下面积 [AUC]:0.902;敏感性:0.728;特异性:0.906 与 AUC:0.759;敏感性:0.761;特异性:0.756)(P<0.001)。值得注意的是,与 PI-RADS 评估相比,DL 网络在 PSA<10ng/ml 臂中表现出显著优势(AUC:0.788;敏感性:0.588;特异性:0.883 与 AUC:0.618;敏感性:0.379;特异性:0.763)(P=0.041)。

结论

我们开发了基于 DL 的 mpMRI 集成模型,用于 csPCa 分类,与临床 PI-RADS 评估相比,具有更高的敏感性、特异性和准确性。在 PSA 分层条件下,在高 PSA 组和低 PSA 组中,DL 集成模型在 csPCa 的检测中比 PI-RADS 表现更好。

相似文献

1
Deep learning model for the detection of prostate cancer and classification of clinically significant disease using multiparametric MRI in comparison to PI-RADs score.基于多参数 MRI 的深度学习模型在 PI-RADS 评分基础上对前列腺癌的检测和临床显著疾病的分类
Urol Oncol. 2024 May;42(5):158.e17-158.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.021. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
2
Predicting clinically significant prostate cancer with a deep learning approach: a multicentre retrospective study.深度学习方法预测具有临床意义的前列腺癌:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Feb;50(3):727-741. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-06036-9. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
3
Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分与指数病变和多灶性、临床显著前列腺癌的相关性。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 May;1(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 May 15.
4
Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.前列腺机器人辅助经会阴融合前列腺活检前前列腺双参数与多参数 MRI 的头对头比较。
World J Urol. 2022 Oct;40(10):2431-2438. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04120-1. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
5
Added Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Selecting Prostate Biopsy Candidates Among Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen and PI-RADS ≥3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Systematic Assessment by PI-RADS Score.在前列腺特异性抗原和 PI-RADS≥3 病变的前列腺多参数磁共振成像中前列腺特异性抗原升高的男性中选择前列腺活检候选者时前列腺特异性抗原密度的附加价值:按 PI-RADS 评分进行系统评估。
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Jul;10(4):634-640. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.10.006. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
6
[Analysis of the relationship between PI-RADS scores and the pathological results of targeted biopsy based on MRI].[基于MRI的PI-RADS评分与靶向活检病理结果的关系分析]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2023 Nov 23;45(11):942-947. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220805-00538.
7
Elucidating the need for prostate cancer risk calculators in conjunction with mpMRI in initial risk assessment before prostate biopsy at a tertiary prostate cancer center.在三级前列腺癌中心进行前列腺活检前的初始风险评估中,结合 mpMRI 阐明前列腺癌风险计算器的需求。
BMC Urol. 2024 Mar 26;24(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01460-5.
8
PI-RADS in Predicting csPCa: A Comparison Between Academic and Nonacademic Centers.PI-RADS在预测临床显著前列腺癌中的应用:学术中心与非学术中心的比较
Prostate. 2025 Mar;85(4):337-343. doi: 10.1002/pros.24832. Epub 2024 Dec 22.
9
Predictors of prostate cancer detection in MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions - Reality of a tertiary center.MRI PI-RADS 3 病变中前列腺癌检出的预测因素——三级中心的现实。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2023 Dec 20;95(4):11830. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2023.11830.
10
How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?如何在 PI-RADS v2 评分≤3 的初次活检无前列腺癌的男性中做出临床决策以避免不必要的前列腺筛查?
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01524-9. Epub 2019 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Generalist medical foundation model improves prostate cancer segmentation from multimodal MRI images.通科医学基础模型可改善多模态MRI图像中的前列腺癌分割。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jun 18;8(1):372. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01756-2.
2
MRI-Ultrasound Fused Approach for Prostate Biopsy-How It Is Performed.用于前列腺活检的MRI-超声融合方法——操作过程
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 7;16(7):1424. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071424.