Morris Robert D
Research Now, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Public Health Policy. 2024 Mar;45(1):114-125. doi: 10.1057/s41271-023-00451-4. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
Denialist scientists played an outsized role in shaping public opinion and determining public health policy during the recent COVID pandemic. From early on, amplification of researchers who denied the threat of COVID shaped public opinion and undermined public health policy. The forces that amplify denialists include (1) Motivated amplifiers seeking to protect their own interests by supporting denialist scientists, (2) Conventional media outlets giving disproportionate time to denialist opinions, (3) Promoters of controversy seeking to gain traction in an 'attention economy,' and (4) Social media creating information silos in which denialists can become the dominant voice. Denialist amplification poses an existential threat to science relevant to public policy. It is incumbent on the scientific community to create a forum to accurately capture the collective perspective of the scientific community related to public health policy that is open to dissenting voices but prevents artificial amplification of denialists.
在最近的新冠疫情期间,否认主义科学家在塑造公众舆论和决定公共卫生政策方面发挥了过大的作用。从一开始,那些否认新冠威胁的研究人员的观点被放大,从而塑造了公众舆论并破坏了公共卫生政策。放大否认主义者观点的力量包括:(1)出于自身利益动机,通过支持否认主义科学家来保护自身利益的放大者;(2)给予否认主义观点过多报道时间的传统媒体;(3)试图在“注意力经济”中获得关注的争议推动者;(4)社交媒体形成了信息孤岛,使得否认主义者能够成为主导声音。否认主义的放大对与公共政策相关的科学构成了生存威胁。科学界有责任创建一个论坛,准确收集科学界与公共卫生政策相关的集体观点,这个论坛要对不同意见开放,但要防止否认主义者的观点被人为放大。