Cuesta-Gómez Alicia, Fernández-González Pilar, Carratalá-Tejada María, Aguilar-Bejines Inmaculada
Motion Analysis, Ergonomics, Biomechanics and Motor Control Laboratory (LAMBECOM), Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28922 Madrid, Spain.
Crecer con mi Fisio|Fisioterapia Infantil, CL Estrasburgo, 41012 Sevilla, Spain.
Children (Basel). 2024 Feb 16;11(2):252. doi: 10.3390/children11020252.
Although advances in obstetric and neonatal care have improved the survival of preterm infants, many studies document the increased risk of motor and sensory neurodevelopmental abnormalities that can hinder school progress. The aim of this study was to analyze the differences in gross and fine motor development in children born preterm and full term aged 3 to 6 years using the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales 2 (PDMS-II). Fifteen preterm and fifteen term children, matched for age and sex, participated in this study. They were evaluated with the PDMS-II scale. The scores obtained in the PDMS-II scale showed statistically significant differences ( < 0.05) in all subscales except for the "grasping" subscale. No dissimilarities were found between children who attended an early intervention program and those who did not participate, nor was there any correlation between week of gestation and birth weight and motor development in preschool. The results obtained show that differences are found with respect to motor development, with lower scores for those born preterm compared to children born at term. No statistically significant difference was found between preterm children who attended early intervention and those who did not. No correlation was found between motor development at preschool age and birth weight and gestational age.
尽管产科和新生儿护理的进步提高了早产儿的存活率，但许多研究表明，运动和感觉神经发育异常的风险增加，这可能会阻碍学业进展。本研究的目的是使用皮博迪发育运动量表第2版（PDMS-II）分析3至6岁早产和足月出生儿童在大运动和精细运动发育方面的差异。15名早产儿童和15名足月儿童参与了本研究，他们在年龄和性别上相匹配。对他们进行了PDMS-II量表评估。在PDMS-II量表中获得的分数在除“抓握”子量表外的所有子量表中均显示出统计学上的显著差异（<0.05）。参加早期干预项目的儿童与未参加的儿童之间未发现差异，妊娠周数和出生体重与学龄前儿童的运动发育之间也没有相关性。所得结果表明，在运动发育方面存在差异，早产儿的得分低于足月儿。参加早期干预的早产儿童与未参加的儿童之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。学龄前儿童的运动发育与出生体重和胎龄之间未发现相关性。
