Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Oviedo, C/ Julián Clavería S/N, 33006, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Mar;31(14):22055-22072. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32540-6. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
LCA methodology provides the best framework to evaluate environmental impacts in agriculture systems. However, the interpretation of LCA results, in particular when the objective was to compare different production systems, could be affected by the selection of the functional unit (FU). That is why an accurate definition of the FU, in agreement with the function considered for the systems analysed, is essential. In this work, the organic production at small scale of blueberry, raspberry, blackberry and cape gooseberry in North Spain has been analysed following LCA methodology. Although a different distribution of environmental loads was obtained for each crop, in all cases, the main contributions to most of the considered environmental categories were electric and fertiliser consumptions. The different production systems have been compared on the basis of the environmental impacts associated considering different FUs, i.e. based on fruit mass, cultivated area, farm-gate price and nutritional quality of fruits. Carbon footprints (CF) have been also calculated. It was observed that the order of the crops with respect to their environmental performances was the same for the blueberry and raspberry crops (with the lowest and the highest CF, respectively), independently of the selected FU, whereas the order of the blackberry and cape gooseberry crops was interchanged, depending on the FU used. This work supports the need of being aware of the final objective of the orchards when choosing the FU (i.e. producing fruits, cultivating an area, economic benefits or nourishing people), so that valid conclusions can be achieved from the environmental comparison, even for different agricultural products.
生命周期评估方法为评估农业系统的环境影响提供了最佳框架。然而,特别是当目标是比较不同的生产系统时,LCA 结果的解释可能会受到功能单位 (FU) 的选择的影响。这就是为什么必须准确定义 FU,使其与所分析系统的功能一致。在这项工作中,采用生命周期评估方法分析了西班牙北部小规模蓝莓、覆盆子、黑莓和刺梨的有机生产。尽管每种作物的环境负荷分布不同,但在所有情况下,对大多数考虑的环境类别最重要的贡献都是电力和肥料的消耗。不同的生产系统是基于考虑不同 FU 时相关的环境影响进行比较的,即基于水果质量、种植面积、农场门价格和水果的营养质量。还计算了碳足迹 (CF)。观察到,对于蓝莓和覆盆子作物,其环境性能的作物排序是相同的(分别具有最低和最高的 CF),与所选 FU 无关,而黑莓和刺梨作物的排序则根据使用的 FU 而互换。这项工作支持在选择 FU 时意识到果园的最终目标的必要性(即生产水果、种植面积、经济效益或滋养人民),以便即使对于不同的农产品,也可以从环境比较中得出有效的结论。