• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气味稀释分拣作为一种临床嗅觉功能测试:正常值和可靠性数据。

Odor dilution sorting as a clinical test of olfactory function: normative values and reliability data.

机构信息

Goethe-University, Medical Faculty, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

Chem Senses. 2024 Jan 1;49. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjae008.

DOI:10.1093/chemse/bjae008
PMID:38401152
Abstract

Clinical assessment of an individual's sense of smell has gained prominence, but its resource-intensive nature necessitates the exploration of self-administered methods. In this study, a cohort of 68 patients with olfactory loss and 55 controls were assessed using a recently introduced olfactory test. This test involves sorting 2 odorants (eugenol and phenylethyl alcohol) in 5 dilutions according to odor intensity, with an average application time of 3.5 min. The sorting task score, calculated as the mean of Kendall's Tau between the assigned and true dilution orders and normalized to [0,1], identified a cutoff for anosmia at a score ≤ 0.7. This cutoff, which marks the 90th percentile of scores obtained with randomly ordered dilutions, had a balanced accuracy of 89% (78% to 97%) for detecting anosmia, comparable to traditional odor threshold assessments. Retest evaluations suggested a score difference of ±0.15 as a cutoff for clinically significant changes in olfactory function. In conclusion, the olfactory sorting test represents a simple, self-administered approach to the detection of anosmia or preserved olfactory function. With balanced accuracy similar to existing brief olfactory tests, this method offers a practical and user-friendly alternative for screening anosmia, addressing the need for resource-efficient assessments in clinical settings.

摘要

个体嗅觉的临床评估受到了重视,但因其资源密集型的特点,需要探索自我管理的方法。在这项研究中,我们评估了 68 名嗅觉丧失患者和 55 名对照组患者,使用了最近引入的嗅觉测试。该测试涉及根据气味强度对 2 种气味剂(丁香酚和苯乙醇)进行 5 种稀释度的排序,平均应用时间为 3.5 分钟。排序任务评分,计算为分配和真实稀释顺序之间 Kendall's Tau 的平均值,并归一化到 [0,1],确定了评分≤0.7 时为嗅觉丧失的截断值。该截断值标记了随机排序稀释度获得的分数的第 90 百分位数,用于检测嗅觉丧失的平衡准确性为 89%(78%至 97%),与传统的嗅觉阈值评估相当。重测评估表明,分数差异为±0.15 作为嗅觉功能临床显著变化的截断值。总之,嗅觉排序测试是一种简单、自我管理的嗅觉丧失或嗅觉功能正常的检测方法。该方法具有与现有简短嗅觉测试相似的平衡准确性,为筛查嗅觉丧失提供了一种实用且用户友好的替代方法,满足了临床环境中资源高效评估的需求。

相似文献

1
Odor dilution sorting as a clinical test of olfactory function: normative values and reliability data.气味稀释分拣作为一种临床嗅觉功能测试:正常值和可靠性数据。
Chem Senses. 2024 Jan 1;49. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjae008.
2
Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds.对1036名受试者进行多中心研究,采用标准化方法评估嗅觉功能,该方法结合了气味识别、气味辨别和嗅觉阈值测试。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;257(4):205-11. doi: 10.1007/s004050050223.
3
SMELL-S and SMELL-R: Olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience.SMELL-S 和 SMELL-R:嗅觉测试不受特定嗅觉敏感度或先前嗅觉体验的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 24;114(43):11275-11284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711415114. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
4
The effect of olfactory training on odor identification in patients with traumatic anosmia.嗅觉训练对创伤性嗅觉缺失患者气味识别的影响。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Nov;9(11):1244-1251. doi: 10.1002/alr.22409. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
5
The clinical significance of electrophysiological measures of olfactory function.嗅觉功能电生理测量的临床意义。
Behav Brain Res. 2006 Jun 3;170(1):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.02.013. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
6
The Adaptive Olfactory Measure of Threshold (ArOMa-T): a rapid test of olfactory function.自适应嗅觉阈值测量法(ArOMa-T):一种快速嗅觉功能测试法。
Chem Senses. 2022 Jan 1;47. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjac036.
7
Clinical significance of results from olfactory testing.嗅觉测试结果的临床意义。
Laryngoscope. 2006 Oct;116(10):1858-63. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000234915.51189.cb.
8
Clinical validation of the olfactory detection threshold module of the Snap & Sniff® olfactory test system.临床验证 Snap & Sniff®嗅觉测试系统的嗅觉检测阈值模块。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Sep;9(9):986-992. doi: 10.1002/alr.22377. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
9
Determination of Retronasal Olfactory Threshold Values.测定反鼻音嗅觉阈值。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):1608-1614. doi: 10.1002/lary.29395. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
10
The 8-Odorant Barcelona Olfactory Test (BOT-8): Validation of a New Test in the Spanish Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic.8 气味剂巴塞罗那嗅觉测试(BOT-8):在 COVID-19 大流行期间对西班牙人群进行的新测试的验证。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2022 Jul 22;32(4):291-298. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0824. Epub 2022 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploration of Olfaction and ChiPSO in Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis.小儿囊性纤维化中嗅觉与ChiPSO的探索
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 9;14(8):2583. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082583.