Gudziol Volker, Lötsch Jörn, Hähner Antje, Zahnert Thomas, Hummel Thomas
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Dresden Medical School, Dresden, Germany.
Laryngoscope. 2006 Oct;116(10):1858-63. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000234915.51189.cb.
Although widely used in healthy subjects and patients with olfactory loss, the significance of changes of scores from validated olfactory tests is unknown.
The aim of the present study was to relate the self-assigned changes of olfactory function in terms of "better," "unchanged," and "worse" in patients with smell disorders with the results from olfactory testing by means of a validated test set. Olfactory function of 83 anosmic or hyposmic patients (40 women, 43 men; age 12-84 yr) was tested on two occasions (mean interval 136 days, minimum 7 days, maximum 6.7 yr). Olfactory function was assessed using a validated technique ("Sniffin' Sticks"). This test consists of three subtests, one for odor threshold (T), odor discrimination (D), and odor identification (I), with possible results ranging up to 16 points each. From the sum of the results from the three subtests a composite "TDI" score was obtained.
Forty-four patients indicated an improvement of olfactory function, whereas 39 patients reported no change. No subject reported deterioration of olfactory sensitivity. Subjects assigned to group BETTER had higher TDI scores in the second olfactory tests than subjects assigned to the group UNCHANGED, both in absolute terms and as compared with the first olfactory test (effect "test occasion" by "self-assessed improvement," P < .001). There was no significant difference between groups with respect to age and sex (P = .99 and .84, respectively). Logistic regression showed that more than 60% of the subjects reported an improvement of olfactory sensitivity when the TDI score increased by 5.5 points.
We show that there is a statistically significant relation between measured and perceived improvement of olfactory function in patients who first presented with the diagnosis of anosmia or hyposmia. The results indicate that improved olfactory function in patients with olfactory deficiency is perceived as such in everyday life and is quantitatively related to an improvement in the composite TDI score of the "Sniffin' Sticks" olfactory test battery. This is the basis for the application of a specific therapy for olfactory loss because of a possible gain in quality of life for the patients.
尽管嗅觉测试在健康受试者和嗅觉丧失患者中广泛应用,但经过验证的嗅觉测试分数变化的意义尚不清楚。
本研究的目的是将嗅觉障碍患者自我评定的嗅觉功能变化(“改善”、“不变”和“恶化”)与通过经过验证的测试集进行嗅觉测试的结果相关联。对83名嗅觉减退或嗅觉丧失患者(40名女性,43名男性;年龄12 - 84岁)的嗅觉功能进行了两次测试(平均间隔136天,最短7天,最长6.7年)。使用经过验证的技术(“嗅棒”)评估嗅觉功能。该测试包括三个子测试,一个用于气味阈值(T)、气味辨别(D)和气味识别(I),每个子测试的可能结果最高可达16分。从三个子测试的结果总和中获得一个综合的“TDI”分数。
44名患者表示嗅觉功能有所改善,而39名患者报告无变化。没有受试者报告嗅觉敏感性恶化。与“不变”组相比,“改善”组受试者在第二次嗅觉测试中的TDI分数更高,无论是绝对值还是与第一次嗅觉测试相比(“测试时间”与“自我评估改善”的交互作用,P <.001)。两组在年龄和性别方面无显著差异(P分别为.99和.84)。逻辑回归显示,当TDI分数增加5.5分时,超过60%的受试者报告嗅觉敏感性有所改善。
我们表明,首次诊断为嗅觉减退或嗅觉丧失的患者,其嗅觉功能的测量改善与感知改善之间存在统计学上的显著关系。结果表明,嗅觉功能缺陷患者嗅觉功能的改善在日常生活中是可以感知到的,并且与“嗅棒”嗅觉测试组合的综合TDI分数的改善在数量上相关。这是应用针对嗅觉丧失的特定治疗方法的基础,因为这可能会提高患者的生活质量。