• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉瓣修复中根部尺寸与瓣叶大小的系统调整:计算机模拟

Systematic adjustment of root dimensions to cusp size in aortic valve repair: a computer simulation.

作者信息

Marom Gil, Weltert Luca Paolo, Raanani Ehud, Chirirchilli Ilaria, Giebels Christian, Irace Francesco Giosuè, De Paulis Ruggero, Schäfers Hans-Joachim

机构信息

School of Mechanical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, European Hospital, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 Feb 2;38(2). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae024.

DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivae024
PMID:38402485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10902611/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Aortic valve repair requires the creation of a normal geometry of cusps and aortic root. Of the different dimensions, geometric cusp height is the most difficult to change while annular and sinotubular dimensions can be easily modified. The objective of this study was to investigate, by computer simulation, ideal combinations of annular and sinotubular junction size for a given geometric height.

METHODS

Based on a literature review of anatomical data, a computational biomechanics model was generated for a tricuspid aortic valve. We aimed to determine the ideal relationships for the root dimensions, keeping geometric height constant and creating different combinations of the annular and sinotubular junction dimensions. Using this model, 125 virtual anatomies were created, with 25 different combinations of annulus and sinotubular junction. Effective height, coaptation height and mechanical cusp stress were calculated with the valves in closed configuration.

RESULTS

Generally, within the analysed range of geometric heights, changes to the annular diameter yielded a stronger impact than sinotubular junction diameter changes for optimal valve configuration. The best results were obtained with the sinotubular junction being 2-4 mm larger than the annulus, leading to higher effective height, normal coaptation height and lower stress. Within the range tested, stenosis did not occur due to annular reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

In tricuspid aortic valves, the geometric height can be used to predict ideal post-repair annular and sinotubular junction dimensions for optimal valve configuration. Such an ideal configuration is associated with reduced cusp stress.

摘要

目的

主动脉瓣修复需要重塑瓣叶和主动脉根部的正常几何形态。在不同维度中,瓣叶几何高度最难改变,而瓣环和窦管交界尺寸则较易调整。本研究的目的是通过计算机模拟,探究给定几何高度下瓣环和窦管交界尺寸的理想组合。

方法

基于对解剖学数据的文献综述,构建了一个三尖瓣主动脉瓣的计算生物力学模型。我们旨在确定根部尺寸的理想关系,保持几何高度不变,并创建瓣环和窦管交界尺寸的不同组合。使用该模型,创建了125个虚拟解剖结构,其中瓣环和窦管交界有25种不同组合。在瓣膜处于关闭状态时计算有效高度、贴合高度和瓣叶机械应力。

结果

一般来说,在分析的几何高度范围内,对于优化瓣膜构型,瓣环直径的变化比窦管交界直径的变化产生的影响更大。当窦管交界比瓣环大2 - 4毫米时,可获得最佳结果,此时有效高度更高、贴合高度正常且应力更低。在测试范围内,未因瓣环缩小而发生狭窄。

结论

在三尖瓣主动脉瓣中,几何高度可用于预测修复后瓣环和窦管交界的理想尺寸,以实现最佳瓣膜构型。这种理想构型与瓣叶应力降低相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/10902611/cb0db2816204/ivae024f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/10902611/9fbb6a135b6c/ivae024f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/10902611/cade99c93e59/ivae024f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/10902611/26d34a95d6e2/ivae024f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/10902611/f2a773413329/ivae024f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/10902611/c0a8c0405178/ivae024f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/10902611/cb0db2816204/ivae024f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/10902611/9fbb6a135b6c/ivae024f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/10902611/cade99c93e59/ivae024f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/10902611/26d34a95d6e2/ivae024f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/10902611/f2a773413329/ivae024f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/10902611/c0a8c0405178/ivae024f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/10902611/cb0db2816204/ivae024f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic adjustment of root dimensions to cusp size in aortic valve repair: a computer simulation.主动脉瓣修复中根部尺寸与瓣叶大小的系统调整:计算机模拟
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 Feb 2;38(2). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae024.
2
Impact of aortic annular geometry on aortic valve insufficiency: Insights from a preclinical, ex vivo, porcine model.主动脉瓣环几何形状对主动脉瓣关闭不全的影响:来自临床前、离体、猪模型的见解。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;150(3):656-64.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.060. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
3
Numerical model of the aortic root and valve: optimization of graft size and sinotubular junction to annulus ratio.主动脉根部和瓣膜的数值模型:移植物大小和窦管交界处与瓣环比值的优化。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1227-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.01.030. Epub 2013 Feb 10.
4
Free margin length and coaptation surface area in normal tricuspid aortic valve: an anatomical study.正常三尖瓣主动脉瓣的游离缘长度和对合面积:解剖学研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 May 1;53(5):1040-1048. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx456.
5
Aortic root numeric model: annulus diameter prediction of effective height and coaptation in post-aortic valve repair.主动脉根部数值模型:主动脉瓣修复术后有效瓣环高度和对合的预测。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;145(2):406-411.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.080. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
6
Sorin Solo stentless valve: extended adaptability for sinotubular junction mismatch.索林单叶无支架瓣膜:对窦管交界不匹配的适应性扩展
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008 Aug;7(4):548-51. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2008.176941. Epub 2008 May 16.
7
Fluid-structure interaction simulation of aortic valve closure with various sinotubular junction and sinus diameters.不同主动脉窦管交界和窦直径下主动脉瓣关闭的流固耦合模拟
Ann Biomed Eng. 2015 Jun;43(6):1363-9. doi: 10.1007/s10439-014-1120-7. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
8
Differences in aortic cusp coaptation between the reimplantation and the remodeling techniques of aortic valve-sparing surgery: an in vitro porcine model study.主动脉瓣环成形术与再植入术对主动脉瓣叶对合影响的比较:体外猪模型研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):615-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.01.029. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
9
Cusp height in aortic valves.主动脉瓣嵴高度。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;146(2):269-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.06.053. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
10
Cusp-based geometric height-oriented repair of a pediatric aortic valve.基于嵴的几何高度导向修复儿科主动脉瓣。
Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Dec 3;2020. doi: 10.1510/mmcts.2020.067.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolution over time of aortic root anatomy after aortic valve reimplantation.主动脉瓣再植入术后主动脉根部解剖结构随时间的演变。
JTCVS Open. 2025 Apr 23;25:39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.04.007. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Quadricuspid aortic valve repair: Results of a phenotype-based approach.四叶式主动脉瓣修复:基于表型方法的结果
JTCVS Tech. 2025 Jan 23;30:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2025.01.009. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Use of complementary electrocardiogram-gated cardiac computed tomography in the assessment of aortic valve repairability: a pilot study†.

本文引用的文献

1
Functional aortic annulus remodelling-revisited.功能性主动脉瓣环重塑——再探讨。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Sep 7;64(3). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad320.
2
Significance of Effective Height and Mechanism of Regurgitation in Tricuspid Aortic Valve Repair.三尖瓣主动脉瓣修复术中有效高度的意义及反流机制
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Feb;115(2):429-435. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.05.055. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
3
Similar long-term survival after isolated bioprosthetic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement: A propensity-matched analysis.
在评估主动脉瓣修复可行性中使用互补心电图门控心脏计算机断层扫描:一项初步研究†
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 Mar 29;40(4). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf086.
4
Comparison of pulmonary and aortic root and cusp dimensions in normal adults using computed tomography: potential implications for Ross procedure planning.使用计算机断层扫描比较正常成年人的肺动脉、主动脉根部及瓣膜尺寸:对罗斯手术规划的潜在影响
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 Dec 3;39(6). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae206.
孤立生物瓣与机械主动脉瓣置换术后长期生存相似:倾向匹配分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Nov;164(5):1444-1455.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.11.181. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
4
Systolic stretching of the ascending aorta.升主动脉的收缩期伸展。
Arch Med Sci. 2019 Feb 18;17(1):25-30. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.82997. eCollection 2021.
5
Geometry of cusp and root determines aortic valve function.瓣尖和根部的几何形状决定主动脉瓣功能。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jan;36(Suppl 1):64-70. doi: 10.1007/s12055-019-00813-2. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
6
Results of Pericardial Patches in Tricuspid and Bicuspid Aortic Cusp Repair.三尖瓣和二尖瓣主动脉瓣叶修复中心包膜补片的结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Mar;109(3):728-735. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.07.025. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
7
Is small cusp size a limitation for aortic valve repair?†.瓣叶小是主动脉瓣修复的局限性吗?†
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Sep 1;56(3):497-502. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz053.
8
Free margin length and coaptation surface area in normal tricuspid aortic valve: an anatomical study.正常三尖瓣主动脉瓣的游离缘长度和对合面积:解剖学研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 May 1;53(5):1040-1048. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx456.
9
Mechanical or Biologic Prostheses for Aortic-Valve and Mitral-Valve Replacement.用于主动脉瓣和二尖瓣置换的机械或生物假体
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1847-1857. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613792.
10
Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for chronic severe aortic regurgitation: a propensity score analysis.瓣膜修复改善慢性重度主动脉瓣反流手术的预后:一项倾向评分分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):1913-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Feb 10.