• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

再次手术治疗复发性或难治性三叉神经痛:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Repeat Surgery for Recurrent or Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2024 May;185:370-380.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.097. Epub 2024 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.097
PMID:38403014
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Surgery can effectively treat Trigeminal neuralgia (TN), but postoperative pain recurrence or nonresponse are common. Repeat surgery is frequently offered but limited data exist to guide the selection of salvage surgical procedures. We aimed to compare pain relief outcomes after repeat microvascular decompression (MVD), percutaneous rhizotomy (PR), or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to determine which modality was most efficacious for surgically refractory TN.

METHODS

A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis was performed, including studies of adults with classical or idiopathic TN undergoing repeat surgery. Primary outcomes included complete (CPR) and adequate (APR) pain relief at last follow-up, analyzed in a multivariate mixed-effect meta-regression of proportions. Secondary outcomes were initial pain relief and facial numbness.

RESULTS

Of 1299 records screened, 61 studies with 68 treatment arms (29 MVD, 14 PR, and 25 SRS) comprising 2165 patients were included. Combining MVD, PR, and SRS study data, 68.8% achieved initial CPR after a repeat TN procedure. On average, 49.6% of the combined sample of MVD, PR, and SRS had CPR at final follow-up, which was on average 2.99 years postoperatively. The proportion (with 95% CI) achieving CPR at final follow-up was 0.57 (0.51-0.62) for MVD, 0.60 (0.52-0.68) for PR, and 0.35 (0.30-0.41) for SRS, with a significantly lower proportion of pain relief with SRS. Estimates of initial CPR for MVD were 0.82 (0.78-0.85), 0.68 for PR (0.6-0.76), and 0.41 for SRS (0.35-0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Across MVD, PR, and SRS, about half of TN patients maintain complete CPR at an average follow-up time of 3 years after repeat surgery. In treating refractory or recurrent TN, MVD and PR were superior to SRS in both initial pain relief and long-term pain relief at final follow-up. These findings can inform surgical decision-making in this challenging population.

摘要

目的

手术可以有效治疗三叉神经痛(TN),但术后疼痛复发或无反应较为常见。重复手术经常被提供,但指导选择挽救性手术程序的数据有限。我们旨在比较重复微血管减压(MVD)、经皮神经根切断术(PR)或立体定向放射外科(SRS)后的疼痛缓解结果,以确定哪种方式对手术难治性 TN 最有效。

方法

进行了 PRISMA 系统评价和荟萃分析,纳入了接受重复手术的成人经典或特发性 TN 的研究。主要结局包括末次随访时完全缓解(CPR)和充分缓解(APR)的疼痛缓解,在多元混合效应比例荟萃回归中进行分析。次要结局为初始疼痛缓解和面部麻木。

结果

在筛选的 1299 份记录中,纳入了 61 项研究,共 68 个治疗臂(29 项 MVD、14 项 PR 和 25 项 SRS),共 2165 例患者。综合 MVD、PR 和 SRS 的研究数据,68.8%的患者在重复 TN 手术后出现初始 CPR。平均而言,综合 MVD、PR 和 SRS 样本中,49.6%的患者在末次随访时具有 CPR,平均术后 2.99 年。在 MVD、PR 和 SRS 的最终随访中,达到 CPR 的比例(95%CI)分别为 0.57(0.51-0.62)、0.60(0.52-0.68)和 0.35(0.30-0.41),SRS 的缓解比例明显较低。MVD 的初始 CPR 估计值为 0.82(0.78-0.85)、PR 为 0.68(0.6-0.76)、SRS 为 0.41(0.35-0.48)。

结论

在 MVD、PR 和 SRS 中,约一半的 TN 患者在重复手术后平均 3 年的随访中保持完全 CPR。在治疗难治性或复发性 TN 时,MVD 和 PR 在初始疼痛缓解和最终随访时的长期疼痛缓解方面均优于 SRS。这些发现可以为这一具有挑战性的人群的手术决策提供信息。

相似文献

1
Repeat Surgery for Recurrent or Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.再次手术治疗复发性或难治性三叉神经痛:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2024 May;185:370-380.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.097. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
2
Current advances in the surgical treatment of glossopharyngeal neuralgia.舌咽神经痛外科治疗的当前进展
Neurosurg Rev. 2023 Feb 2;46(1):47. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-01948-y.
3
A Systematic Review of Repeat Microvascular Decompression for Recurrent or Persistent Trigeminal Neuralgia.重复微血管减压术治疗复发性或持续性三叉神经痛的系统评价。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Feb;158:226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.129. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
4
Efficacy and safety of microvascular decompression with or without partial sensory rhizotomy: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review in treating trigeminal neuralgia.微血管减压术联合或不联合部分感觉根切断术治疗三叉神经痛的疗效和安全性:一项全面的荟萃分析和系统评价。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 May 24;47(1):229. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02463-4.
5
Pain-Free Outcomes and Durability of Surgical Intervention for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Comparison of Gamma Knife and Microvascular Decompression.三叉神经痛手术干预的无痛结局与持久性:伽玛刀与微血管减压术的比较
World Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;112:e732-e746. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.141. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
6
Repeat percutaneous rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia is not associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications.重复经皮三叉神经根切断术治疗三叉神经痛不会增加术后并发症的风险。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Oct;245:108466. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108466. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
7
Effects of the length of preoperative conservative management on postoperative outcomes after primary microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia.原发性三叉神经微血管减压术前保守治疗时长对术后结局的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2025 Feb 7;143(1):92-99. doi: 10.3171/2024.9.JNS241436. Print 2025 Jul 1.
8
Efficacy and safety of a third stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia: an international, multicenter study.第三次立体定向放射外科治疗复发性三叉神经痛的疗效和安全性:一项国际多中心研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Oct 23;166(1):422. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06317-2.
9
Is percutaneous balloon compression better than microvascular decompression to treat trigeminal neuralgia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮球囊压迫术与微血管减压术治疗三叉神经痛的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2023 Mar;109:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
10
Microvascular Decompression Versus Gamma Knife Surgery in Patients with Drug-Resistant Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.微血管减压术与伽玛刀手术治疗药物难治性三叉神经痛的疗效比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.020. Epub 2022 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia patients with or without concomitant continuous pain.伽玛刀放射外科治疗伴有或不伴有持续性疼痛的三叉神经痛患者的长期疗效
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 20;103(51):e41026. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041026.
2
Pathophysiology and Management of Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia.难治性三叉神经痛的病理生理学与管理
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2024 Dec 12;25(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s11910-024-01387-2.
3
Microvascular Decompression: An Effective Approach for Trigeminal Neuralgia Caused by a Dolichoectatic Basilar Artery after Multiple Treatment Failures.
微血管减压术:多次治疗失败后对由基底动脉迂曲扩张引起的三叉神经痛的一种有效治疗方法
J Neurol Surg Rep. 2024 Sep 27;85(3):e156-e160. doi: 10.1055/a-2342-4086. eCollection 2024 Jul.