Suppr超能文献

微血管减压术联合或不联合部分感觉根切断术治疗三叉神经痛的疗效和安全性:一项全面的荟萃分析和系统评价。

Efficacy and safety of microvascular decompression with or without partial sensory rhizotomy: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review in treating trigeminal neuralgia.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Faculty of Medicine, FMABC University Center, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2024 May 24;47(1):229. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02463-4.

Abstract

Classical trigeminal neuralgia (TN), caused by vascular compression of the nerve root, is a severe cause of pain with a considerable impact on a patient's quality of life. While microvascular decompression (MVD) has lower recurrence rates when compared with partial sensory rhizotomy (PSR) alone, refractoriness can still be as high as 47%. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety profile of MVD + PSR when compared to standalone MVD for TN. We searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included those with ≥ 4 patients, in English, published between January 1980 and December 2023, comparing MVD vs. MVD + PSR for TN. Endpoints were pain cure, immediate post-operative pain improvement, long-term effectiveness, long-term recurrence, and complications (facial numbness, hearing loss, and intracranial bleeding). We pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals with a random-effects model. I was used to assess heterogeneity, and sensitivity and Baujat analysis were conducted to address high heterogeneity. Eight studies were included, comprising a total of 1,338 patients, of whom 1,011 were treated with MVD and 327 with MVD + PSR. Pain cure analysis revealed a lower likelihood of pain cure in patients treated with MVD when compared to patients treated with MVD + PSR (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.72). Immediate postoperative pain improvement assessment revealed a lower likelihood of improvement in the MVD group when compared with the MVD + PSR group (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.95). Facial numbness assessment revealed a lower likelihood of occurrence in MVD alone when compared to MVD + PSR (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.15). Long-term effectiveness, long-term recurrence, hearing loss, and intracranial bleeding analyses revealed no difference between both approaches. Our meta-analysis identified that MVD + PSR was superior to MVD for pain cure and immediate postoperative pain improvement for treating TN. However, MVD + PSR demonstrated a higher likelihood of facial numbness complications. Furthermore, identified that hearing loss and intracranial bleeding complications appear comparable between the two treatments, and no difference between long-term effectiveness and recurrence.

摘要

经典三叉神经痛(TN)是由神经根血管压迫引起的,是一种严重的疼痛原因,对患者的生活质量有相当大的影响。微血管减压术(MVD)与单纯部分感觉根切断术(PSR)相比,复发率较低,但仍有 47%的患者可能出现难治性。我们旨在评估 MVD+PSR 与单独 MVD 治疗 TN 的疗效和安全性。我们按照 PRISMA 指南搜索了 Medline、Embase 和 Web of Science。纳入的研究包括≥4 例患者、英文发表、1980 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月之间、比较 MVD 与 MVD+PSR 治疗 TN 的研究。终点为疼痛缓解、术后即刻疼痛改善、长期疗效、长期复发和并发症(面部麻木、听力损失和颅内出血)。我们采用随机效应模型汇总优势比(OR)及其 95%置信区间。I ² 用于评估异质性,进行敏感性和 Baujat 分析以解决高异质性问题。纳入了 8 项研究,共包括 1338 例患者,其中 1011 例接受 MVD 治疗,327 例接受 MVD+PSR 治疗。疼痛缓解分析显示,与 MVD+PSR 治疗组相比,MVD 治疗组的疼痛缓解可能性较低(OR=0.30,95%CI:0.13 至 0.72)。术后即刻疼痛改善评估显示,与 MVD+PSR 组相比,MVD 组的改善可能性较低(OR=0.31,95%CI:0.10 至 0.95)。面部麻木评估显示,与 MVD+PSR 组相比,MVD 组的发生率较低(OR=0.08,95%CI:0.04 至 0.15)。长期疗效、长期复发、听力损失和颅内出血分析显示两种方法之间无差异。我们的荟萃分析表明,MVD+PSR 优于 MVD,可提高 TN 的疼痛缓解和术后即刻疼痛改善。然而,MVD+PSR 更有可能导致面部麻木并发症。此外,发现两种治疗方法的听力损失和颅内出血并发症似乎相当,长期疗效和复发无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验