Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230601, China.
Department of Clinical Medicine, The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 25;14(1):4572. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55145-y.
Using updated National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) follow-up data, and a large nationwide representative sample of adult U.S. citizens, the aim of this study was to explore the relationship between dietary flavonol intake, all-cause and cause-specific mortality risks. In this prospective cohort study based on NHANES (2007-2008, 2009-2010, and 2017-2018), a total of 11,679 participants aged 20 years and above were evaluated. The amount and type of food taken during a 24-h dietary recall were used to estimate dietary flavonol intake, which includes total flavonol, isorhamnetin, kaempferol, myricetin, and quercetin. Each analysis of the weighted data was dealt with in accordance with the NHANES reporting requirements' intricate stratification design. The Cox proportional risk regression model or Fine and Gray competing risks regression model were applied to evaluate all-cause and cause-specific mortality risks, respectively. The follow-up period was calculated using the time interval between the baseline and the death date or December 31, 2019 (whichever occurs first). Each data analysis was performed between October 1, 2023, and October 22, 2023. Dietary flavonol intake included total flavonol, isorhamnetin, kaempferol, myricetin, and quercetin. Up to December 31, 2019, National Death Index (NDI) mortality data were used to calculate mortality from all causes as well as cause-specific causes. A total of 11,679 individuals, which represents 44,189,487 U.S. non-hospitalized citizens, were included in the study; of these participants, 49.78% were male (n = 5816), 50.22% were female (n = 5, 863); 47.56% were Non-Hispanic White (n = 5554), 18.91% were Non-Hispanic Black (n = 2209), 16.23% were Mexican American (n = 1895), and 17.30% were other ethnicity (n = 2021); The mean [SE] age of the sample was 46.93 [0.36] years, with a median follow-up of 7.80 years (interquartile range, 7.55-8.07 years). After adjusting covariates, Cox proportional hazards models and fine and gray competing risks regression models for specific-cause mortality demonstrated that total flavonol intake was associated with all-cause (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.54-0.75), cancer-specific (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28-0.70) and CVD-specific (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.96) mortality risks; isorhamnetin intake was associated with all-cause (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.86), and cancer-specific (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.83) mortality risks; kaempferol intake was associated with all-cause (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.86), and cancer-specific (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.97) mortality risks; myricetin intake was associated with all-cause (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.88), AD-specific (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.85), and CVD-specific (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.47-0.80) mortality risks; quercetin intake was associated with all-cause (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.54-0.81), cancer-specific (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35-0.84), and CVD-specific (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-0.93) mortality risks; there was no correlation observed between dietary flavonol intake and DM-specific mortality. According to the current study, all-cause, AD, cancer, and CVD mortality risks declined with increased dietary flavonoid intake in the U.S. adults. This finding may be related to the anti-tumor, anti-inflammatory, and anti-oxidative stress properties of flavonol.
利用最新的国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)随访数据,以及一项针对美国成年公民的全国性代表性大型样本,本研究旨在探讨饮食类黄酮摄入与全因和特定原因死亡率风险之间的关系。在这项基于 NHANES(2007-2008、2009-2010 和 2017-2018 年)的前瞻性队列研究中,共评估了 11679 名年龄在 20 岁及以上的参与者。通过 24 小时膳食回忆中摄入的食物量和类型来估计饮食类黄酮的摄入量,其中包括总类黄酮、异鼠李素、山奈酚、杨梅素和槲皮素。对加权数据的每一次分析都根据 NHANES 报告要求的复杂分层设计进行处理。分别应用 Cox 比例风险回归模型或 Fine 和 Gray 竞争风险回归模型评估全因和特定原因死亡率风险。随访时间的计算方法是从基线到死亡日期或 2019 年 12 月 31 日(以先到者为准)之间的时间间隔。每次数据分析均在 2023 年 10 月 1 日至 2023 年 10 月 22 日之间进行。饮食类黄酮的摄入量包括总类黄酮、异鼠李素、山奈酚、杨梅素和槲皮素。截至 2019 年 12 月 31 日,国家死亡指数(NDI)死亡率数据用于计算所有原因以及特定原因的死亡率。共纳入 11679 名个体,代表 44189487 名未住院的美国公民,其中 49.78%为男性(n=5816),50.22%为女性(n=5863);47.56%为非西班牙裔白人(n=5554),18.91%为非西班牙裔黑人(n=2209),16.23%为墨西哥裔美国人(n=1895),17.30%为其他种族(n=2021);样本的平均[SE]年龄为 46.93[0.36]岁,中位随访时间为 7.80 年(四分位距,7.55-8.07 年)。调整协变量后,Cox 比例风险模型和特定原因死亡率的 Fine 和 Gray 竞争风险回归模型表明,总类黄酮摄入与全因(HR 0.64,95%CI 0.54-0.75)、癌症特异性(HR 0.45,95%CI 0.28-0.70)和心血管疾病特异性(HR 0.67,95%CI 0.47-0.96)死亡率风险相关;异鼠李素摄入与全因(HR 0.72,95%CI 0.60-0.86)和癌症特异性(HR 0.62,95%CI 0.46-0.83)死亡率风险相关;山奈酚摄入与全因(HR 0.74,95%CI 0.63-0.86)和癌症特异性(HR 0.62,95%CI 0.40-0.97)死亡率风险相关;杨梅素摄入与全因(HR 0.77,95%CI 0.67-0.88)、AD 特异性(HR 0.34,95%CI 0.14-0.85)和心血管疾病特异性(HR 0.61,95%CI 0.47-0.80)死亡率风险相关;槲皮素摄入与全因(HR 0.66,95%CI 0.54-0.81)、癌症特异性(HR 0.54,95%CI 0.35-0.84)和心血管疾病特异性(HR 0.61,95%CI 0.40-0.93)死亡率风险相关;饮食类黄酮摄入与糖尿病特异性死亡率之间没有相关性。根据本研究,美国成年人饮食类黄酮摄入量的增加与全因、AD、癌症和心血管疾病死亡率的降低有关。这一发现可能与类黄酮的抗肿瘤、抗炎和抗氧化应激特性有关。