• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生态系统退化还是恢复?2000-2020 年中国土地利用的作用演变。

Ecosystem degradation or restoration? The evolving role of land use in China, 2000-2020.

机构信息

Hubei Key Laboratory of Regional Ecology and Environmental Change, School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China.

Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2024 Feb 26;196(3):304. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12464-x.

DOI:10.1007/s10661-024-12464-x
PMID:38403777
Abstract

Dramatic land use change in China affects ecosystem degradation and restoration. Identifying the evolving role of land use in ecosystem degradation and restoration in China is essential for sustainable land policy making. However, it is not clear how land use affects ecosystem degradation and restoration over time. Here, we used the revised benefit transfer approach and spatial statistics based on land use data to determine the evolving role that land use plays in ecosystem degradation and restoration in China during 2000-2020. The study results pointed out that the deterioration of the forestland ecosystem during the study period was the main reason for ecosystem degradation, while the conversion of arable land to forestland was the main cause for ecosystem restoration. Every 1% increase of land use intensity in the periods 2000-2005, 2005-2010, 2010-2015, and 2015-2020 resulted in -1.754%, 0.697%, 1.098%, and -0.058% of the changes in ecosystem services, respectively. This study provided important policy implications for future sustainable land use management in China.

摘要

中国剧烈的土地利用变化影响着生态系统的退化和恢复。确定土地利用在中国生态系统退化和恢复中的演变作用,对于可持续土地政策的制定至关重要。然而,目前尚不清楚土地利用如何随时间影响生态系统的退化和恢复。在这里,我们使用修正后的效益转移方法和基于土地利用数据的空间统计方法,来确定在 2000-2020 年间,土地利用在中国生态系统退化和恢复中扮演的演变角色。研究结果指出,在研究期间,林地生态系统的恶化是生态系统退化的主要原因,而耕地向林地的转化是生态系统恢复的主要原因。在 2000-2005 年、2005-2010 年、2010-2015 年和 2015-2020 年期间,土地利用强度每增加 1%,生态系统服务的变化分别为-1.754%、0.697%、1.098%和-0.058%。本研究为中国未来可持续土地利用管理提供了重要的政策启示。

相似文献

1
Ecosystem degradation or restoration? The evolving role of land use in China, 2000-2020.生态系统退化还是恢复?2000-2020 年中国土地利用的作用演变。
Environ Monit Assess. 2024 Feb 26;196(3):304. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12464-x.
2
Land use change and its driving forces toward mutual conversion in Zhangjiakou City, a farming-pastoral ecotone in Northern China.中国北方农牧交错带张家口市土地利用变化及其相互转换驱动力研究
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Sep 14;189(10):505. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6218-6.
3
Temporal and spatial analysis of the ecosystem service values in the Three Gorges Reservoir area of China based on land use change.基于土地利用变化的中国三峡库区生态系统服务价值的时空分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(18):26549-26563. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17827-2. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
4
Assessing the impact of global initiatives on current and future land restoration scenarios in India.评估全球倡议对印度当前和未来土地恢复情景的影响。
Environ Res. 2023 Jan 1;216(Pt 1):114413. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114413. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
5
Response of Ecosystem Health to Land Use Changes and Landscape Patterns in the Karst Mountainous Regions of Southwest China.中国西南喀斯特山区生态系统健康对土地利用变化和景观格局的响应
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;19(6):3273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063273.
6
Long-Term Effects of Ecological Restoration Projects on Ecosystem Services and Their Spatial Interactions: A Case Study of Hainan Tropical Forest Park in China.长期生态修复工程对生态系统服务及其空间相互作用的影响:以中国海南热带森林公园为例。
Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;73(3):493-508. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01892-z. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
7
Value assessment of ecosystem services in nature reserves in Ningxia, China: a response to ecological restoration.中国宁夏自然保护区生态系统服务价值评估:对生态恢复的响应。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 19;9(2):e89174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089174. eCollection 2014.
8
Land cover and landscape changes in Shaanxi Province during China's Grain for Green Program (2000-2010).中国退耕还林工程(2000 - 2010年)期间陕西省的土地覆盖与景观变化
Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Oct;187(10):644. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4881-z. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
9
Impact of socioeconomic development on ecosystem services and its conservation strategies: a case study of Shandong Province, China.社会经济发展对生态系统服务的影响及其保护策略:以中国山东省为例。
Environ Monit Assess. 2012 May;184(5):3213-29. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2183-7. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
10
Soil quality of an Iranian forest ecosystem after conversion to various types of land use.伊朗森林生态系统转变为不同类型土地利用后的土壤质量。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Jul 4;190(8):447. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6815-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of degradation risk areas and delineation of key ecological function areas in Qinling region.秦岭地区退化风险区域识别与关键生态功能区划定
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 5;15(1):4374. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87464-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Spatial relationship between land urbanization and ecosystem health in the Yangtze River Basin, China.中国长江流域土地城镇化与生态系统健康的空间关系。
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Jul 15;195(8):957. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11563-5.
2
Is China approaching the inflection point of the ecological Kuznets curve? Analysis based on ecosystem service value at the county level.中国是否即将接近生态库兹涅茨曲线的拐点?基于县级生态系统服务价值的分析。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 15;326(Pt A):116629. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116629. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
3
Natural and anthropogenic factors on China's ecosystem services: Comparison and spillover effect perspective.
自然和人为因素对中国生态系统服务的影响:比较和溢出效应视角。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Dec 15;324:116064. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116064. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
4
Research on the Coordinated Governance Mechanism of Cross-Regional and Cross-Basin Ecological Compensation in the Yangtze River Delta.长三角跨区域跨流域生态补偿协同治理机制研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;19(16):9881. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169881.
5
China's ecosystem service value in 1992-2018: Pattern and anthropogenic driving factors detection using Bayesian spatiotemporal hierarchy model.中国 1992-2018 年生态系统服务价值:基于贝叶斯时空分层模型的格局和人为驱动因素探测。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 15;302(Pt B):114089. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114089. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
6
Loess Plateau: from degradation to restoration.黄土高原:从退化到恢复。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 10;738:140206. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140206. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
7
Land use transitions and the associated impacts on ecosystem services in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China based on the geo-informatic Tupu method.基于地理信息图谱 Tupu 方法的中国长江经济带中游土地利用变化及其对生态系统服务的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jan 20;701:134690. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134690. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
8
Effects and relationships of grazing intensity on multiple ecosystem services in the Inner Mongolian steppe.内蒙古草原放牧强度对多种生态系统服务的影响及关系
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jul 20;675:642-650. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.279. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
9
Exploring the regional differences of ecosystem health and its driving factors in China.探索中国生态系统健康的区域差异及其驱动因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jul 10;673:553-564. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.465. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
10
The spatial association of ecosystem services with land use and land cover change at the county level in China, 1995-2015.中国县级 1995-2015 年生态系统服务与土地利用/土地覆被变化的空间关联。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jun 15;669:459-470. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.139. Epub 2019 Mar 11.