Nogueira Vanessa Ota, Neves Maria Carolina, Neppelenbroek Karin, Oliveira Thaís Marchini, Sforza Chiarella, Soares Simone
Post graduate student, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 Jun;62(6):985-994. doi: 10.1177/10556656241234603. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the quantitative values of linear and angular facial anthropometrics in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and compare them with those of patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) using three-dimensional (3D) facial imaging.DesignRetrospective, observational, and cross-sectional study.SettingHospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies/USP (HRAC/USP).Patients/ ParticipantsIn total, 61 non-syndromic patients with CLP who underwent multidisciplinary treatment and rehabilitated with a prosthesis were enrolled and divided into those with UCLP (G1; n = 31) and those with BCLP (G2; n = 30).InterventionFacial images were captured using a 3D camera after landmarks were marked on each patient's face. The software evaluated linear and angular parameters. Statistical tests were applied. Significance was determined as < 0.05.Main Outcome MeasurementsOverall, 22 linear and 13 angular measurements were evaluated.ResultsThe nasal length (= 0.08), middle third of the face (= 0.06), base nose width (< 0.001), nasal root width (< 0.001), nasal tip angle (= 0.018), philtrum width (< 0.001), lower face width (= 0.039) and midfacial depth (= 0.040) were significantly higher in G2; the upper cutaneous lip height was significantly higher in G1. Sexual dimorphism was observed except for linear measurements (linear distance between the labiale superius and labiale inferius landmarks, nasal root width, and upper cutaneous lip length) and angular measurements.ConclusionsG2 had a greater length and width of nose and nasal root, nasal tip angle, philtrum width, and lower face width, midfacial depth, and midface third than G1. These findings also revealed the presence of sexual dimorphism.
目的
通过三维(3D)面部成像评估单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)患者面部线性和角度人体测量学的定量值,并与双侧唇腭裂(BCLP)患者进行比较。
设计
回顾性、观察性横断面研究。
设置
颅面畸形康复医院/圣保罗大学(HRAC/USP)。
患者/参与者
总共纳入61例接受多学科治疗并使用假体康复的非综合征性唇腭裂患者,分为单侧唇腭裂组(G1;n = 31)和双侧唇腭裂组(G2;n = 30)。
干预
在每位患者面部标记地标后,使用3D相机采集面部图像。软件评估线性和角度参数,并进行统计检验。显著性设定为<0.05。
主要观察指标
总体评估了22项线性测量和13项角度测量。
结果
G2组的鼻长度(= 0.08)、面部中三分之一(= 0.06)、鼻底宽度(< 0.001)、鼻根宽度(< 0.001)、鼻尖角度(= 0.018)、人中宽度(< 0.001)、下脸宽度(= 0.039)和中面部深度(= 0.040)显著更高;G1组的上唇皮肤高度显著更高。除线性测量(上唇与下唇地标之间的线性距离、鼻根宽度和上唇皮肤长度)和角度测量外,观察到性别差异。
结论
与G1组相比,G2组的鼻和鼻根长度及宽度、鼻尖角度、人中宽度、下脸宽度、中面部深度和面部中三分之一更大。这些发现还揭示了性别差异的存在。