Suppr超能文献

评价一项以就餐环境和课程为目标的长期日托干预措施,以增加儿童蔬菜摄入量:使用多阶段优化策略框架的整群随机对照试验。

Evaluation of a long day care intervention targeting the mealtime environment and curriculum to increase children's vegetable intake: a cluster randomised controlled trial using the multiphase optimisation strategy framework.

机构信息

Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.

Nutrition Australia Victorian Division, Carlton, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2024 Feb 26;27(1):e87. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024000557.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the reach, adoption, implementation and effectiveness of an intervention to increase children's vegetable intake in long day care (LDC).

DESIGN

A 12-week pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial, informed by the multiphase optimisation strategy (MOST), targeting the mealtime environment and curriculum. Children's vegetable intake and variety was measured at follow-up using a modified Short Food Survey for early childhood education and care and analysed using a two-part mixed model for non-vegetable and vegetable consumers. Outcome measures were based on the RE-AIM framework.

SETTING

Australian LDC centres.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-nine centres, 120 educators and 719 children at follow-up.

RESULTS

There was no difference between intervention and waitlist control groups in the likelihood of consuming any vegetables when compared with non-vegetable consumers for intake (OR = 0·70, (95 % CI 0·34-1·43), = 0·32) or variety (OR = 0·73 (95 % CI 0·40-1·32), = 0·29). Among vegetable consumers ( 652), there was no difference between groups in vegetable variety (exp(b): 1·07 (95 % CI:0·88-1·32, = 0·49) or vegetable intake (exp(b): 1·06 (95 % CI: 0·78, 1·43)), = 0·71) with an average of 1·51 (95 % CI 1·20-1·82) and 1·40 (95 % CI 1·08-1·72) serves of vegetables per day in the intervention and control group, respectively. Intervention educators reported higher skills for promoting vegetables at mealtimes, and knowledge and skills for teaching the curriculum, than control (all < 0·001). Intervention fidelity was moderate ( 16/20 and 15/16 centres used the Mealtime environment and Curriculum, respectively) with good acceptability among educators. The intervention reached 307/8556 centres nationally and was adopted by 22 % eligible centres.

CONCLUSIONS

The pragmatic self-delivered online intervention positively impacted educator's knowledge and skills and was considered acceptable and feasible. Intervention adaptations, using the MOST cyclic approach, could improve intervention impact on children' vegetable intake.

摘要

目的

确定一项干预措施在增加日托(LDC)儿童蔬菜摄入量方面的覆盖范围、采用情况、实施情况和效果。

设计

一项为期 12 周的实用群组随机对照试验,以多阶段优化策略(MOST)为指导,针对进餐环境和课程。使用改良后的幼儿教育和保育短期食品调查,在随访时测量儿童的蔬菜摄入量和种类,并使用非蔬菜消费者和蔬菜消费者的两部分混合模型进行分析。结果测量基于 RE-AIM 框架。

地点

澳大利亚 LDC 中心。

参与者

39 个中心、120 名教育工作者和 719 名随访儿童。

结果

与非蔬菜消费者相比,干预组和候补组在摄入任何蔬菜的可能性方面没有差异(摄入时的 OR = 0.70(95 % CI 0.34-1.43), = 0.32)或种类(OR = 0.73(95 % CI 0.40-1.32), = 0.29)。在蔬菜消费者( 652)中,两组之间的蔬菜种类(exp(b):1.07(95 % CI:0.88-1.32, = 0.49)或蔬菜摄入量(exp(b):1.06(95 % CI:0.78-1.43))无差异,干预组和对照组平均每天分别摄入 1.51(95 % CI 1.20-1.82)和 1.40(95 % CI 1.08-1.72)份蔬菜。干预组的教育工作者报告在进餐时间促进蔬菜方面的技能更高,在教授课程方面的知识和技能更高,而对照组则没有(所有 0.001)。干预的保真度适中(分别有 16/20 和 15/16 个中心使用了进餐环境和课程),教育工作者对其接受度较高。该干预措施在全国范围内覆盖了 307/8556 个中心,有 22 %符合条件的中心采用了该干预措施。

结论

实用的自我提供的在线干预措施对教育工作者的知识和技能产生了积极影响,被认为是可接受和可行的。使用 MOST 循环方法进行干预调整可能会提高干预对儿童蔬菜摄入量的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5954/10966837/a56dc6a3493b/S1368980024000557_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验