• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“作为一名患者,我不属于诊所,我属于社区。” 在南非开普敦共同开展一项多层次、以患者为中心的结核病耻辱感干预措施。

"As a patient I do not belong to the clinic, I belong to the community." Co-developing a multi-level, person-centred tuberculosis stigma intervention in Cape Town, South Africa.

作者信息

Hayward Sally E, Vanqa Nosivuyile, Makanda Goodman, Tisile Phumeza, Ngwatyu Luthando, Foster Isabel, Mcinziba Abenathi, Biewer Amanda, Mbuyamba Rachel, Galloway Michelle, Bunyula Siyavuya, Westhuizen Helene-Mari, Friedland Jon S, Marino-Medina Andrew, Viljoen Lario, Schoeman Ingrid, Hoddinott Graeme, Nathavitharana Ruvandhi R

机构信息

TB Proof.

Stellenbosch University.

出版信息

Res Sq. 2024 Feb 8:rs.3.rs-3921970. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3921970/v1.

DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3921970/v1
PMID:38405783
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10889064/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anticipated, internal, and enacted stigma are major barriers to TB care engagement, and directly impact patient well-being. Unfortunately, targeted stigma interventions are lacking. We aimed to co-develop a person-centred stigma intervention with TB-affected community members and health workers in South Africa.

METHODS

Using a community-based participatory research approach, we conducted ten group discussions with people diagnosed with TB (past or present), caregivers, and health workers (total n=87) in Khayelitsha, Cape Town. Group discussions were facilitated by TB survivors. Discussion guides explored experiences and drivers of stigma and used human-centred design principles to co-develop solutions. Recordings were transcribed, coded, thematically analysed and then further interpreted using the socio-ecological model.

RESULTS

Intervention components across socio-ecological levels shared common behaviour change strategies, namely education, empowerment, engagement, and innovation. At the individual level, participants recommended counselling to improve TB knowledge and provide ongoing support. TB survivors can guide messaging to nurture stigma resilience by highlighting that TB can affect anyone and is curable, and provide lived experiences of TB to decrease internal stigma. At the interpersonal level, support clubs and family-centred counselling were suggested to dispel TB-related myths and foster support. At the institutional level, health worker stigma reduction training informed by TB survivor perspectives was recommended. Consideration of how integration of TB/HIV care services may exacerbate TB/HIV intersectional stigma and ideas for restructured service delivery models were suggested to decrease anticipated and enacted stigma. At the community level, participants recommended awareness-raising events led by TB survivors, including TB information in school curricula. At the policy level, solutions focused on reducing the visibility generated by a TB diagnosis and resultant stigma in health facilities and shifting tasks to community health workers.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreasing TB stigma requires a multi-level approach. Co-developing a person-centred intervention with affected communities is feasible and generates stigma intervention components that are directed and implementable. Such community-informed intervention components should be prioritised by TB programs, including integrated TB/HIV care services.

摘要

背景

预期污名、内在污名和表现出的污名是参与结核病治疗的主要障碍,并直接影响患者的幸福感。不幸的是,缺乏针对性的污名干预措施。我们旨在与南非受结核病影响的社区成员和卫生工作者共同开发一种以患者为中心的污名干预措施。

方法

采用基于社区的参与性研究方法,我们在开普敦的凯伊利沙与结核病确诊患者(既往或现患)、护理人员和卫生工作者(共87人)进行了10次小组讨论。小组讨论由结核病幸存者主持。讨论指南探讨了污名的经历和驱动因素,并运用以人为本的设计原则共同制定解决方案。对录音进行转录、编码、主题分析,然后使用社会生态模型进行进一步解读。

结果

社会生态层面的干预组成部分共享共同的行为改变策略,即教育、赋权、参与和创新。在个体层面,参与者建议提供咨询以提高结核病知识并提供持续支持。结核病幸存者可以通过强调结核病可影响任何人且可治愈来指导信息传递,以培养抗污名能力,并分享结核病的亲身经历以减少内在污名。在人际层面,建议设立支持俱乐部和以家庭为中心的咨询服务,以消除与结核病相关的误解并促进支持。在机构层面,建议开展基于结核病幸存者观点的减少卫生工作者污名培训。考虑到结核病/艾滋病护理服务的整合可能会加剧结核病/艾滋病交叉污名,并提出了重组服务提供模式的想法,以减少预期污名和表现出的污名。在社区层面,参与者建议由结核病幸存者牵头开展提高认识活动,包括在学校课程中纳入结核病信息。在政策层面,解决方案侧重于减少结核病诊断在卫生设施中产生的可见度和由此导致的污名,并将任务转移给社区卫生工作者。

结论

减少结核病污名需要采取多层次方法。与受影响社区共同开发以患者为中心的干预措施是可行的,并能产生有针对性且可实施的污名干预组成部分。此类基于社区的干预组成部分应由结核病项目优先考虑,包括结核病/艾滋病综合护理服务。

相似文献

1
"As a patient I do not belong to the clinic, I belong to the community." Co-developing a multi-level, person-centred tuberculosis stigma intervention in Cape Town, South Africa.“作为一名患者,我不属于诊所,我属于社区。” 在南非开普敦共同开展一项多层次、以患者为中心的结核病耻辱感干预措施。
Res Sq. 2024 Feb 8:rs.3.rs-3921970. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3921970/v1.
2
"As a patient I do not belong to the clinic, I belong to the community": co-developing multi-level, person-centred tuberculosis stigma interventions in Cape Town, South Africa.“作为一名患者,我不属于诊所,我属于社区”:在南非开普敦共同开展多层次、以人为本的结核病耻辱感干预措施。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2024;2(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00084-z. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
3
"This is an illness. No one is supposed to be treated badly": community-based stigma assessments in South Africa to inform tuberculosis stigma intervention design.“这是一种疾病。任何人都不应受到恶劣对待”:南非基于社区的耻辱感评估,为结核病耻辱感干预设计提供信息。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2024;2(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00070-5. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
4
"This is an illness. No one is supposed to be treated badly": Community-based stigma assessments in South Africa to inform TB stigma intervention design.“这是一种疾病。任何人都不应受到恶劣对待”:南非基于社区的耻辱感评估,为结核病耻辱感干预设计提供信息。
Res Sq. 2023 Dec 11:rs.3.rs-3716733. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3716733/v1.
5
Analysing interventions designed to reduce tuberculosis-related stigma: A scoping review.分析旨在减少结核病相关耻辱感的干预措施:一项范围综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;2(10):e0000989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000989. eCollection 2022.
6
A qualitative study of patients and healthcare workers' experiences and perceptions to inform a better understanding of gaps in care for pre-discharged tuberculosis patients in Cape Town, South Africa.一项关于患者和医护人员的体验和看法的定性研究,旨在更好地了解南非开普敦出院结核病患者护理方面的差距。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 29;22(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07540-2.
7
Community health worker training to reduce mental health and substance use stigma towards patients who have disengaged from HIV/TB care in South Africa: protocol for a stepped wedge hybrid type II pilot implementation trial.社区卫生工作者培训以减少南非对已脱离艾滋病毒/结核病护理患者的心理健康和药物使用污名化:一项阶梯楔形混合II型试点实施试验方案
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jan 2;5(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00537-w.
8
Tuberculosis结核病
9
Engagement of non-government organisations and community care workers in collaborative TB/HIV activities including prevention of mother to child transmission in South Africa: opportunities and challenges.南非非政府组织和社区护理人员参与结核病/艾滋病合作活动,包括预防母婴传播:机遇与挑战。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 2;12:233. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-233.
10
Quantification and correlates of tuberculosis stigma along the tuberculosis testing and treatment cascades in South Africa: a cross-sectional study.南非结核分枝杆菌检测和治疗环节中结核耻辱感的量化及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 Oct 22;9(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00762-8.

本文引用的文献

1
"This is an illness. No one is supposed to be treated badly": community-based stigma assessments in South Africa to inform tuberculosis stigma intervention design.“这是一种疾病。任何人都不应受到恶劣对待”:南非基于社区的耻辱感评估,为结核病耻辱感干预设计提供信息。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2024;2(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00070-5. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
2
Analysing interventions designed to reduce tuberculosis-related stigma: A scoping review.分析旨在减少结核病相关耻辱感的干预措施:一项范围综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;2(10):e0000989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000989. eCollection 2022.
3
Interventions pathways to reduce tuberculosis-related stigma: a literature review and conceptual framework.干预措施减少结核病相关污名的途径:文献综述和概念框架。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2022 Sep 23;11(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-01021-8.
4
Perceptions, preferences, and experiences of tuberculosis education and counselling among patients and providers in Kampala, Uganda: A qualitative study.乌干达坎帕拉的结核病患者和医务人员对结核病教育和咨询的看法、偏好和经验:一项定性研究。
Glob Public Health. 2022 Nov;17(11):2911-2928. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.2000629. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of human-centred design for global health interventions: a quantitative framework.以人为中心的全球卫生干预措施的成本效益分析:一种定量框架。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Mar;7(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007912.
6
Effect of Tuberculosis (TB) and Diabetes mellitus (DM) integrated healthcare on bidirectional screening and treatment outcomes among TB patients and people living with DM in developing countries: a systematic review.结核病(TB)和糖尿病(DM)综合医疗保健对发展中国家 TB 患者和糖尿病患者双向筛查和治疗结果的影响:系统评价。
Pathog Glob Health. 2023 Feb;117(1):36-51. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2022.2046967. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
7
Participatory Prototyping of a Tailored Undetectable Equals Untransmittable Message to Increase HIV Testing Among Men in Western Cape, South Africa.参与式原型设计定制化不可检测即不可传播信息以增加南非西开普省男性的 HIV 检测
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2021 Nov;35(11):428-434. doi: 10.1089/apc.2021.0101.
8
Tuberculosis treatment within differentiated service delivery models in global HIV/TB programming.全球艾滋病毒/结核病规划中差异化服务提供模式下的结核病治疗。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2021 Oct;24 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):e25809. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25809.
9
Duration and determinants of delayed tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment in high-burden countries: a mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis.高负担国家结核病延迟诊断和治疗的持续时间及决定因素:一项混合方法系统评价和荟萃分析。
Respir Res. 2021 Sep 23;22(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01841-6.
10
Individualized Treatment Duration in Tuberculosis Treatment: Precision versus Simplicity.结核病治疗中的个体化治疗疗程:精准与简化
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;204(9):1013-1014. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202107-1744ED.