Whyte William, Hennessy Catherine
Brighton and Sussex Medical School.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2017 May 11;6:83. doi: 10.15694/mep.2017.000083. eCollection 2017.
This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Since the early 2000s social media has become a major part of our daily lives, and over the past decade it has found its way into the medical profession. Despite its ubiquity, only 5 systematic reviews exist on the subject of social medial use within medical education. The reviews conclude that there are positive correlations linked to social media use however the studies are restricted by the same limitations: a lack of quantitative data and the fact that social media research fast becomes outdated. This review will therefore examine the latest studies in order to identify which questions remain to be answered and what areas need further development in order for social media to become a credible resource within medical education. The information gained from this process will be amalgamated to create a valid questionnaire which will produce quantitative data. A systematic review of Pubmed, Cochrane, PsychINFO, ERIC & Scopus was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was from 1st January 2014 to the 12th January 2017 and included keywords linked with social media and medical education. 27 papers were identified: 12 qualitative and 15 quantitative. From this data a questionnaire was drafted and put to a focus group in order for it to be validated. Six major themes were identified and analysed: community & interactivity, communication & feedback, learning theories, social media vs traditional didactic lectures, role of faculty and professionalism. Quantitative data was limited but highlighted the efficiency of social media use especially when Facebook and Twitter were used. After the analysis a validated questionnaire was produced. Social media can be a useful tool within the medical curriculum if implemented correctly. The final questionnaire can be used to generate quantitative data on the following questions: which platforms are most effective and for what purposes? How beneficial is social media to teaching? and What do students understand the benefits/disadvantages of academic social media platforms to be?
本文已迁移。该文章被标记为推荐文章。自21世纪初以来,社交媒体已成为我们日常生活的重要组成部分,在过去十年中,它已进入医学领域。尽管社交媒体无处不在,但关于医学教育中社交媒体使用的主题仅有5篇系统评价。这些评价得出结论,社交媒体的使用存在正相关关系,但研究受到相同限制:缺乏定量数据以及社交媒体研究很快过时。因此,本综述将研究最新的研究,以确定哪些问题仍有待解答,以及哪些领域需要进一步发展,以便社交媒体成为医学教育中的可靠资源。从这一过程中获得的信息将被整合以创建一份有效的问卷,该问卷将产生定量数据。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对PubMed、Cochrane、PsychINFO、ERIC和Scopus进行了系统评价。搜索时间为2014年1月1日至2017年1月12日,包括与社交媒体和医学教育相关的关键词。共识别出27篇论文:12篇定性论文和15篇定量论文。根据这些数据起草了一份问卷,并提交给一个焦点小组进行验证。确定并分析了六个主要主题:社区与互动性、沟通与反馈、学习理论、社交媒体与传统说教式讲座、教师角色和专业精神。定量数据有限,但突出了社交媒体使用的效率,尤其是在使用Facebook和Twitter时。分析后产生了一份经过验证的问卷。如果实施得当,社交媒体可以成为医学课程中的有用工具。最终问卷可用于生成关于以下问题的定量数据:哪些平台最有效以及用于何种目的?社交媒体对教学有多大益处?以及学生认为学术社交媒体平台的优缺点是什么?