• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于定性协同设计的方法,确定心血管护士、辅助卫生专业人员和医生工作场所相关困扰的来源,并制定幸福感策略。

A qualitative co-design-based approach to identify sources of workplace-related distress and develop well-being strategies for cardiovascular nurses, allied health professionals, and physicians.

机构信息

Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 585 University Avenue LPMB 119 K, M5G 2N2, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Goldfarb Intelligence Marketing, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10669-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-10669-x
PMID:38408946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10897985/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Clinician distress is a multidimensional condition that includes burnout, decreased meaning in work, severe fatigue, poor work-life integration, reduced quality of life, and suicidal ideation. It has negative impacts on patients, providers, and healthcare systems. In this three-phase qualitative investigation, we identified workplace-related factors that drive clinician distress and co-designed actionable interventions with inter-professional cardiovascular clinicians to decrease their distress and improve well-being within a Canadian quaternary hospital network.

METHODS

Between October 2021 and May 2022, we invited nurses, allied health professionals, and physicians to participate in a three-phase qualitative investigation. Phases 1 and 2 included individual interviews and focus groups to identify workplace-related factors contributing to distress. Phase 3 involved co-design workshops that engaged inter-professional clinicians to develop interventions addressing drivers of distress identified. Qualitative information was analyzed using descriptive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-one clinicians (24 nurses, 10 allied health professionals, and 17 physicians) participated. Insights from Phases 1 and 2 identified five key thematic drivers of distress: inadequate support within inter-professional teams, decreased joy in work, unsustainable workloads, limited opportunities for learning and professional growth, and a lack of transparent leadership communication. Phase 3 co-design workshops yielded four actionable interventions to mitigate clinician distress in the workplace: re-designing daily safety huddles, formalizing a nursing coaching and mentorship program, creating a value-added program e-newsletter, and implementing an employee experience platform.

CONCLUSION

This study increases our understanding on workplace-related factors that contribute to clinician distress, as shared by inter-professional clinicians specializing in cardiovascular care. Healthcare organizations can develop effective interventions to mitigate clinician distress by actively engaging healthcare workers in identifying workplace drivers of distress and collaboratively designing tailored, practical interventions that directly address these challenges.

摘要

目的

临床医生的痛苦是一种多维状态,包括倦怠、工作意义降低、严重疲劳、工作与生活融合不良、生活质量下降和自杀意念。它对患者、医护人员和医疗保健系统都有负面影响。在这项三阶段定性研究中,我们确定了导致临床医生痛苦的工作场所相关因素,并与跨专业心血管临床医生共同设计了可操作的干预措施,以减少他们在加拿大四级医院网络中的痛苦并提高幸福感。

方法

在 2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 5 月期间,我们邀请护士、辅助医疗专业人员和医生参加三阶段定性研究。第 1 阶段和第 2 阶段包括个人访谈和焦点小组,以确定导致痛苦的工作场所相关因素。第 3 阶段涉及共同设计工作坊,让跨专业临床医生参与制定针对确定的痛苦驱动因素的干预措施。使用描述性主题分析对定性信息进行分析。

结果

共有 51 名临床医生(24 名护士、10 名辅助医疗专业人员和 17 名医生)参与。第 1 阶段和第 2 阶段的见解确定了痛苦的五个关键主题驱动因素:跨专业团队内部支持不足、工作乐趣降低、工作量不可持续、学习和职业发展机会有限以及缺乏透明的领导沟通。第 3 阶段的共同设计工作坊产生了四项减轻工作场所临床医生痛苦的可操作干预措施:重新设计日常安全讨论、正式实施护理辅导和指导计划、创建增值计划电子通讯、以及实施员工体验平台。

结论

这项研究增加了我们对导致跨专业心血管护理临床医生痛苦的工作场所相关因素的理解。医疗保健组织可以通过积极让医护人员参与确定工作场所痛苦的驱动因素,并共同设计直接解决这些挑战的量身定制的实用干预措施,来开发有效的干预措施来减轻临床医生的痛苦。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/468c/10897985/009b2ab58a9e/12913_2024_10669_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/468c/10897985/009b2ab58a9e/12913_2024_10669_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/468c/10897985/009b2ab58a9e/12913_2024_10669_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A qualitative co-design-based approach to identify sources of workplace-related distress and develop well-being strategies for cardiovascular nurses, allied health professionals, and physicians.基于定性协同设计的方法,确定心血管护士、辅助卫生专业人员和医生工作场所相关困扰的来源,并制定幸福感策略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10669-x.
2
Prevalence and drivers of nurse and physician distress in cardiovascular and oncology programmes at a Canadian quaternary hospital network during the COVID-19 pandemic: a quality improvement initiative.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,加拿大四级医院网络中心血管和肿瘤项目中护士和医生的痛苦的流行情况和驱动因素:一项质量改进举措。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 12;14(2):e079106. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079106.
3
Allied health front-line manager perceptions of factors impacting workplace morale and burnout risk.医疗辅助一线管理人员对影响工作场所士气和倦怠风险因素的看法。
J Health Organ Manag. 2022 Jun 22;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-09-2021-0355.
4
Burnout and distress among allied health care professionals in a cardiovascular centre of a quaternary hospital network: a cross-sectional survey.四所医院网络中心血管科中辅助医疗保健专业人员的倦怠和困扰:一项横断面调查。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Jan 11;9(1):E29-E37. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200059. Print 2021 Jan-Mar.
5
Moral distress and burnout among cardiovascular surgery intensive care unit healthcare professionals: A prospective cross-sectional survey.心血管外科重症监护病房医护人员的道德困扰与职业倦怠:一项前瞻性横断面调查。
Can J Crit Care Nurs. 2016 Jan;27(4):27-36.
6
Sources of Clinician Burnout in Providing Care for Underserved Patients in a Safety-Net Healthcare System.为服务不足的患者提供医疗服务导致临床医生倦怠的原因。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(6):1468-1475. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07896-5. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
7
The effectiveness of mindfulness based programs in reducing stress experienced by nurses in adult hospital settings: a systematic review of quantitative evidence protocol.基于正念的项目在减轻成人医院环境中护士所经历压力方面的有效性:定量证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):21-9. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2380.
8
Workplace interventions to improve well-being and reduce burnout for nurses, physicians and allied healthcare professionals: a systematic review.工作场所干预措施以改善护士、医生和医疗保健专业人员的幸福感并减少倦怠:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 29;13(6):e071203. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071203.
9
Burnout and distress among physicians in a cardiovascular centre of a quaternary hospital network: a cross-sectional survey.一家四级医院网络中心心血管科医生的倦怠和苦恼:一项横断面调查。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Jan 11;9(1):E10-E18. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200057. Print 2021 Jan-Mar.
10
Burnout and distress among nurses in a cardiovascular centre of a quaternary hospital network: a cross-sectional survey.一家四级医院网络中心血管科护士的倦怠和苦恼:一项横断面调查。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Jan 11;9(1):E19-E28. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200058. Print 2021 Jan-Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Physician Attributes That Matter Most: Results from a Qualitative Inquiry of Oncologists, Patients Receiving Oncological Care, and Medical Students.最重要的医生特质:肿瘤学家、接受肿瘤护理的患者及医学生的定性调查结果
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jun 11;32(6):343. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32060343.
2
Burnout Trends Among US Health Care Workers.美国医护人员的职业倦怠趋势
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255954. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5954.
3
Creating Organisational Working Conditions Where Nurses Can Thrive: An International Action Research Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinician Well-Being Assessment and Interventions in Joint Commission-Accredited Hospitals and Federally Qualified Health Centers.临床医生健康评估与联合委员会认证医院和联邦合格健康中心的干预措施。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023 Oct;49(10):511-520. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
2
Associations of physician burnout with career engagement and quality of patient care: systematic review and meta-analysis.医生职业倦怠与职业投入和患者护理质量的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2022 Sep 14;378:e070442. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070442.
3
Experience of learning from everyday work in daily safety huddles-a multi-method study.
营造护士能够蓬勃发展的组织工作环境:一项国际行动研究
Nurs Rep. 2025 Mar 12;15(3):95. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15030095.
4
"You do need each member of the team to bring that next piece of the puzzle": Allied health professionals' experience of interprofessional complex care in hospital settings.“团队中的每个成员都确实需要带来拼图的下一块”:专职医疗人员在医院环境中提供跨专业复杂护理的经验。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 14;20(3):e0317799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317799. eCollection 2025.
从日常安全班前会上的工作学习经验——一项多方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 30;22(1):1101. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08462-9.
4
Prevalence and Predictors of Burnout Among Occupational Therapy Practitioners in the United States.美国职业治疗从业者的 burnout 发生率及其预测因素。
Am J Occup Ther. 2022 Jul 1;76(4). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2022.048108.
5
The impact of huddles on a multidisciplinary healthcare teams' work engagement, teamwork and job satisfaction: A systematic review.群体讨论对多学科医疗团队的工作投入、团队合作和工作满意度的影响:系统评价。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Jun;28(3):382-393. doi: 10.1111/jep.13648. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
6
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.定性研究中饱和度的样本量:实证检验的系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
7
Huddles and their effectiveness at the frontlines of clinical care: a scoping review.临床护理前沿的团队协作及其效果:综述
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2772-2783. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06632-9. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
8
Burnout and distress among allied health care professionals in a cardiovascular centre of a quaternary hospital network: a cross-sectional survey.四所医院网络中心血管科中辅助医疗保健专业人员的倦怠和困扰:一项横断面调查。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Jan 11;9(1):E29-E37. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200059. Print 2021 Jan-Mar.
9
Burnout and distress among nurses in a cardiovascular centre of a quaternary hospital network: a cross-sectional survey.一家四级医院网络中心血管科护士的倦怠和苦恼:一项横断面调查。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Jan 11;9(1):E19-E28. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200058. Print 2021 Jan-Mar.
10
Burnout and distress among physicians in a cardiovascular centre of a quaternary hospital network: a cross-sectional survey.一家四级医院网络中心心血管科医生的倦怠和苦恼:一项横断面调查。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Jan 11;9(1):E10-E18. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200057. Print 2021 Jan-Mar.